Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

TaskManager · 2016-02-27 22:50:13

W24 wrote:

Also, heres something I just came up with:
There was only one kill last night. Meaning that there might be only one active Mafia member. If this is the case, then !nb4 and pyro could both be Mafia.

the whole mafia faction picks one target every night and kills them, not every mafia member individually

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-02-27 23:21:41

!vote Ninja

Honestly I still have him down as most likely to be Mafia. We're in MyLo at this point so he's our best option.

Schlog · 2016-02-27 23:23:39

Rhazzle, could you explain your constant aggression?

Schlog · 2016-02-27 23:26:48

Actually, Rhazzle, I do. Throughout the whole game, you've had a ton of aggression towards everyone else, and maxi123 has been agreeing with absolutely everything you've said. I haven't done that much nor added towards anything, but for some reason my first day 1 post: "wait, so not posting makes you a suspect? well, okay i guess.", was some sort of defense, making me a top suspect. It was just a form of confusion, really, I had no idea what was going on. When I went along with you for voting against Unau, it wasn't because I was trying to avert attention from myself, it was kind of because he was being an idiot, posting random nonsensical garbage along with spamming. It was just annoying, really, and I didn't want him in the game if he wasn't going to try to contribute. Could you explain your obsession to kill everyone without definite proof or reason?

TaskManager · 2016-02-27 23:42:18

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

We're in MyLo at this point so he's our best option.

whats mylo

Ninja wrote:

maxi123 has been agreeing with absolutely everything you've said.

not neccessarily everything but if you acted suspicious by copying his votes, why shouldnt i agree?

Ninja wrote:

but for some reason my first day 1 post: "wait, so not posting makes you a suspect? well, okay i guess.", was some sort of defense, making me a top suspect.

thats not what made you top suspect
you were copying rhazzle's votes + the first one didnt even have any explanation

Calicara · 2016-02-27 23:53:26

I have to agree with Ninja. The day has barely and you're already trying to form a mob. And the way Maxi's on you like a fly on the wall makes it seems like there's some backdoor teamwork going on here. I don't want to assume the worst of you Rhazz, but after day 2's mislynch I don't want to make another. I think we should take the time we have to consider our options and hear from the other players before coming to a decision.

We have time, let's not be hasty.

W24

Schlog · 2016-02-27 23:54:29

maxi123 wrote:

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
We're in MyLo at this point so he's our best option.
whats mylo
Ninja wrote:
maxi123 has been agreeing with absolutely everything you've said.
not neccessarily everything but if you acted suspicious by copying his votes, why shouldnt i agree?
Ninja wrote:
but for some reason my first day 1 post: "wait, so not posting makes you a suspect? well, okay i guess.", was some sort of defense, making me a top suspect.
thats not what made you top suspect
you were copying rhazzle's votes + the first one didnt even have any explanation

I wasn't copying his votes. I voted Unau because he was spamming, and like Anak said, if he's not going to contribute, then he shouldn't be in the game.

Yes, I probably should've explained my first vote, and that was my own fault because I forgot and I couldn't edit it back into the post. But, we all know he was being a general nuisance, so I thought it wouldn't have mattered either way. It just seemed fishy to me that you have agreed with a vast majority of what Rhazz has said, barely having that much information.

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-02-28 00:03:35

@Maxi it stands for mislynch and lose. It's where you're at the point where mislynching+Town dying tonight would make Town lose majority. There's also LyLo (Lynch or lose) where you have to lynch scum or else you lose majority that night.

@Ninja I found it odd how you voted Unau immediatly after me before I brought up policy lynching him.

Schlog · 2016-02-28 00:08:55

He wasn't worth having in the game. He was just spamming and claiming citizen. I don't know how it's odd that I would vote him for that after you brought up policy lynching, but needless to say I agreed with you.

W24

TaskManager · 2016-02-28 00:28:42

Ninja wrote:

Yes, I probably should've explained my first vote, and that was my own fault because I forgot and I couldn't edit it back into the post. But, we all know he was being a general nuisance, so I thought it wouldn't have mattered either way.

you know its quite suspicious when the whole post is just

!vote Unau

so.. yeah
not to mention you were not too active and it seemed like you got on forums just to cast that vote
that sounds more or less reasonable though

Ninja wrote:

It just seemed fishy to me that you have agreed with a vast majority of what Rhazz has said, barely having that much information.

you looked suspicious to me
you looked suspicious to rhaz
rhaz accused you
why shouldnt i agree with him?

also how are we gonna lose majority if we mislynch?

TaskManager · 2016-02-28 00:32:06

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

!vote Ninja
Honestly I still have him down as most likely to be Mafia. We're in MyLo at this point so he's our best option.

just noticed that post
as cali pointed out we have plenty of time (5 irl days), we shouldnt rush with lynching

Schlog · 2016-02-28 00:40:06

maxi123 wrote:

[other stuff]
Ninja wrote:
It just seemed fishy to me that you have agreed with a vast majority of what Rhazz has said, barely having that much information.
you looked suspicious to me
you looked suspicious to rhaz
rhaz accused you
why shouldnt i agree with him?

I'm not saying that wasn't suspicious, because it was. In your case there's no reason not to agree with him. He just seems really aggressive this game.

I would vote the people who haven't said anything, but I think it would be fair to at least let them talk first.

TaskManager · 2016-02-28 00:51:52

Ninja wrote:

He just seems really aggressive this game.

thats rhaz lol
he nearly got himself lynched for that in game 2 (he was town)

Ninja wrote:

I would vote the people who haven't said anything, but I think it would be fair to at least let them talk first.

i guess they have time to speak up, day just started

Calicara · 2016-02-28 01:09:41

I would like to hear more from Onjit, Pyro, and AlphaJon, as I do not trust lurkers.

W24

Onjit · 2016-02-28 01:33:13

Calicara wrote:

I would like to hear more from Onjit, Pyro, and AlphaJon, as I do not trust lurkers.

m8 i live in australia cut me some slack

I think I agree more with Ninja. Rhaz's idea of a 'policy lynch' is dubious at best, since it was an almost certain mislynch of Unau. Granted, Unau was playing like an idiot and deserved to be removed, but both Anak and me were against voting him, instead preferring a replacement. The fact that Rhaz can push an almost certain mislynch. (I don't think anyone really thought Unau was mafia)

Anak · 2016-02-28 01:44:22

I don't know why we all had to vote for Unau instead of waiting for a replacement and voting who we actually suspected, which was Ninja or Rhazh coincidentally. Idk why Rhazh had to push for that vote instead of voting who he actually suspected.

Creature · 2016-02-28 02:02:52

Kaslai will replace !nb4/AmdS

Creature · 2016-02-28 02:05:52

Votecount 2.1

[1] Ninja - RhazzleFrazzle
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] W24
[0] AlphaJon
[0] Kaslai
[0] RhazzleFrazzle

[0] No lynch
[10] Not voting: Onjit, Anak, maxi123, Calicara, Ninja, Pyromaniac, W24, AlphaJon, Kaslai.

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to reach majority.

Schlog · 2016-02-28 02:13:39

hold on if we lynch creature's ghost does that mean we all win

Creature · 2016-02-28 02:14:51

Ninja wrote:

hold on if we lynch creature's ghost does that mean we all win

It means you're just wasting your time.

Onjit · 2016-02-28 02:16:41

Ninja wrote:

hold on if we lynch creature's ghost does that mean we all win

AlphaJon, Schlog, TaskManager, some woman

Kaslai · 2016-02-28 02:45:03

Good morning everyone!

I have finally decided to crawl out of my cave. I also now identify as "Kaslai," as the name "!nb4" doesn't really suit me well anymore. I'm a changed man!

Schlog, W24, AlphaJon, mutantdevle

AlphaJon · 2016-02-28 02:53:24

Tbh I have to agree that Rhaz is playing aggressively, being the first to vote both D2 and D3. I'm not going to vote him, because he seems to play like this regardless of alignment (see previous mafia), and also because there are some of us who just like going unnoticed through the game.
Note to people who consider me as lurking: I was offline for the day, because IRL stuff, and it's hard to post when you have no internet access (actually it's almost 3AM here at the time of this post )

W24 · 2016-02-28 03:45:11

I'm suspecting Kaslai as he was !nb4 before. !nb4 didn't really help us citizens.

Anak · 2016-02-28 03:48:58

W24 wrote:

I'm suspecting Kaslai as he was !nb4 before. !nb4 didn't really help us citizens.

Is this a joke or serious

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#201 2016-02-27 22:50:13

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#202 2016-02-27 23:21:41

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#203 2016-02-27 23:23:39

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#204 2016-02-27 23:26:48

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#205 2016-02-27 23:42:18

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#206 2016-02-27 23:53:26

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#207 2016-02-27 23:54:29

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#208 2016-02-28 00:03:35

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#209 2016-02-28 00:08:55

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#210 2016-02-28 00:28:42

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#211 2016-02-28 00:32:06

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#212 2016-02-28 00:40:06

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#213 2016-02-28 00:51:52

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#214 2016-02-28 01:09:41

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#215 2016-02-28 01:33:13

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#216 2016-02-28 01:44:22

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#217 2016-02-28 02:02:52

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#218 2016-02-28 02:05:52

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#219 2016-02-28 02:13:39

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#220 2016-02-28 02:14:51

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#221 2016-02-28 02:16:41

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#222 2016-02-28 02:45:03

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#223 2016-02-28 02:53:24

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#224 2016-02-28 03:45:11

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#225 2016-02-28 03:48:58

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Board footer