Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Some crews own some maps that are similiar to the games like Bombot etc. When there's no owner of the world then we can't do much, some games have to stop running.
I want to suggest an option to give a member an ability to use commands and owner only blocks. I know, owner only blocks are limited, but it could get implemented when there will come the update.
The /kick is the most important option I think, because, for example, few days ago I was running a game (Curse Tag http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWE352LMq0b0I) and there was a player called maximus12345 which had a hacked client (with god mode) and he was trolling the world. He could open doors and spread curses everywhere. The game could not run properly because of him.
Maybe it's not good to give all the commands and owner only blocks, but some of them would be very useful.
There's no need to make a separate option, this could be included in World Management.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Offline
I like this idea because it enables crew members to effectively manage and moderate a world without the host being there all the time. Something like /giveowner <username> would enable crew members to use owner-only blocks and save/load the level.
Obviously, world owners would be able to /removeowner and /kick anyone who they give ownership to.
I don't think this should be extended to non-crew members though, since it is prone to abuse.
An alternate option could be to add these as permissions to crew rankings, working like getting edit permissions upon entering a level.
Offline
An alternate option could be to add these as permissions to crew rankings, working like getting edit permissions upon entering a level.
There's no need to make a separate option, this could be included in World Management.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Offline
Re: the bombot example you gave
The thing is Thanel owns the bot and entrusts Jesse to run it, not me or ERA or anyone else in the crew.
This bot does not work well being run 24/7 and better at rough intervals, mixture of hype and how often there are small numbers of players.
_
The idea will definitely be added, you are not the first to think of it.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
/removeowner
what happens if you did /removeowner [yourself]?
That was the most stupidest thing I have seen -prodigy5996
ROAD TO 1000 POSTS:
600---700---800---900---1000
Last edited by Everybody_Edits (Jan 33 3333 3:33:37 pm)
Offline
imgood9 wrote:/removeowner
what happens if you did /removeowner [yourself]?
Just like you can't removeedit, it would say you cant
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1748216449.2191 - Generated in 0.042 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.51 MiB (Peak: 1.65 MiB) ]