Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#6551 2015-12-29 20:02:19
#6552 2015-12-29 21:03:18
#6553 2015-12-29 23:22:48
- some woman
- Member
- From: 4th dimension
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,289
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
2/10
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
#6554 2015-12-29 23:36:22
- Lightning Splash
- Member
- From: somewhere
- Joined: 2015-02-20
- Posts: 230
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
?/10
no sig
Offline
#6555 2015-12-29 23:52:33
#6556 2015-12-30 19:32:55
#6557 2015-12-30 19:44:18
- Prodigy
- Member
- From: The United States of America
- Joined: 2015-07-15
- Posts: 2,613
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
9/10 "you lost your powers" (I dont believe it) oh and it's amazing ... oh and it has a few empty spaces to ye :3
Offline
#6558 2015-12-31 00:43:48
#6559 2015-12-31 00:47:35
- some woman
- Member
- From: 4th dimension
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,289
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
8/10 vaporware comparison is humorous
expecting next voters will b like
"0/10 wtf is that"
"0/10 rotating sigs suck"
"0/10 i cant play block crush"
"0/10 i dont care about your sig and my point is only to brag about mine"
please stop randomly giving people obnoxious personality traits they never had in the first place
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
#6560 2015-12-31 13:52:26
- Nebula
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
1/10 ROASTING
only avatar from other game
#6561 2015-12-31 13:58:28, last edited by Nebula (2015-12-31 13:58:51)
- Nebula
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
- advertising
- advertising again
- pictures aren't funny
+ at least you gave credit to stubby with link to profile
+ cool image
+ cool font
- using shield
4/10
I can update it if you want
-----
7/10
#6562 2015-12-31 14:52:50
- some woman
- Member
- From: 4th dimension
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,289
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
2/10 "t" and "y" aren't very descriptive, i recommend you use "my trello account" and "my youtube channel"
the picture on "calm down and get dank" isn't very funny, and has a misleading name
picture collab isn't very funny and looks like it only has 2-3 images
image is cool but you misspelled "formerly" and you have never been referred to as divine v3 on this forum
- advertising
- advertising again
...
- using shield
your sig already advertises block crush and when you pm'd me about shields and i introduced you to them you put like 50 of them on your sig
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
#6563 2015-12-31 14:55:50
- Nebula
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
2/10 "t" and "y" aren't very descriptive, i recommend you use "my trello account" and "my youtube channel"
the picture on "calm down and get dank" isn't very funny, and has a misleading name
picture collab isn't very funny and looks like it only has 2-3 images
image is cool but you misspelled "formerly" and you have never been referred to as divine v3 on this forumdrstereos wrote:- advertising
- advertising again
...
- using shieldyour sig already advertises block crush and when you pm'd me about shields and i introduced you to them you put like 50 of them on your sig
T - Trello, Y - Youtube. There is a shortcut for them.
Ok i will change my signature.
-----
As like i said... 1/10
#6564 2015-12-31 16:26:09
#6565 2015-12-31 16:29:26
- Nebula
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
- advertising
- advertising again
- pictures aren't funny
+ at least you gave credit to stubby with link to profile
+ cool image
+ cool font
- using shield
4/10
2/10 "t" and "y" aren't very descriptive, i recommend you use "my trello account" and "my youtube channel"
the picture on "calm down and get dank" isn't very funny, and has a misleading name
picture collab isn't very funny and looks like it only has 2-3 images
image is cool but you misspelled "formerly" and you have never been referred to as divine v3 on this forumdrstereos wrote:- advertising
- advertising again
...
- using shieldyour sig already advertises block crush and when you pm'd me about shields and i introduced you to them you put like 50 of them on your sig
3/10
Change the color back to orange.
Sorry, those ppl are gone to vote me bad ranks.
Atleast 8/10
#6566 2015-12-31 16:44:52
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,215
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
RUDIK
PLEASE
LET OTHERS PLAY TOO
4 posts in a row
if you got new sig , doesnt mean everybody schould look at it and rate it
Offline
#6567 2015-12-31 16:48:10
- Nebula
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
RUDIK
PLEASE
LET OTHERS PLAY TOO
4 posts in a rowif you got new sig , doesnt mean everybody schould look at it and rate it
k.
-----
9/10
#6568 2015-12-31 22:46:17
#6569 2015-12-31 22:48:04, last edited by AmdS (2015-12-31 22:48:21)
#6570 2016-01-01 15:54:28
- Anatoly
- Guest
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
-99/10 Th signature is... eh? Where is it?? I cant see it!
#6571 2016-01-01 16:21:37
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
8/10
i like the whirlthing effect, but the image is too blurry (also i like how you added moderator land)
I also add worlds that are very decorated with blocks and not with decorations blocks only. That makes the signature looking good.
@AnatolyEE
You must have signature to play
Offline
#6572 2016-01-03 00:23:15
#6573 2016-01-03 00:24:18
- Prodigy
- Member
- From: The United States of America
- Joined: 2015-07-15
- Posts: 2,613
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
6/10 a bit too blurry
Offline
#6574 2016-01-03 00:46:07
- Schlog
- Banned
- Joined: 2015-07-21
- Posts: 1,960
Re: Rate the Sig above you (MUST HAVE SIG TO PLAY!!!)
bad
Offline
#6575 2016-01-03 00:48:54
[ Started around 1747831250.701 - Generated in 0.081 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.62 MiB (Peak: 1.84 MiB) ]