Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
This Just Dont Make Sense Look at this as you can see you need to pay 50 gems to get a 50 gem code but how are we suppose to buy it with 50 gems if we are trying to get 50 gems and its also for the other gem codes
Offline
Well you're not going to get gems for free are you
but i mean your paying 50 gems to get 50 gems that just doesn't make sense
Offline
no youre paying 50 gems to get a 50 gem code
Offline
50 gems = 50 gems
I don't understand the problem.
You don't think it doesn't make sense, you think it's pointless. (no?)
Even at face value, it makes sense. The gems are equal. It is pointless in your view because (as we assume) you don't understand gem codes.
But I assure you, gem codes are not pointless.
Offline
I wished I could select the ammount of gems.
This is a false statement.
Offline
it makes sense because of this:
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed
[ Started around 1733302516.9167 - Generated in 0.034 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.6 MiB) ]