[Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

goeyfun · 2015-04-13 23:34:14

What's wrong with the physics lol
Downwards boosters allow me to jump higher

xJeex · 2015-04-14 06:53:57

The booster problem is fixed and the crown should no longer freeze the game.
My apologies too, it was my fault.

Different55, TSF14, AmdS, DarkDragon4900, ewoke

realmaster42 · 2015-04-14 20:17:04

the hookjump speed is so faster that i cant even complete the first row, while in normal EE it beat 5 of those in 2 or 3 seconds

2015-07-16 13:20:11

Zumza wrote:

EE will no more depend on PlayerIO

Whoa wait... So you mean EE is gonna disallow bots? SO ALL THE BOTS ARE GONNA HAVE TO BE RE-WRITTEN!?

So if you're making a .dll library, use the same kind of thing PlayerIO does. So that you just have to add a new source and the "using" line. I mean do the same methods and variables and classes. That's the only way I'm gonna continue in this game. If the bots are not as good as the previous one, I'm gonna quit.

*GRAVEDIG GRAVEDIG GRAVEDIG*

Zumza · 2015-07-16 14:08:52

alkazam1448 wrote:

Zumza wrote:
EE will no more depend on PlayerIO
Whoa wait... So you mean EE is gonna disallow bots? SO ALL THE BOTS ARE GONNA HAVE TO BE RE-WRITTEN!?
So if you're making a .dll library, use the same kind of thing PlayerIO does. So that you just have to add a new source and the "using" line. I mean do the same methods and variables and classes. That's the only way I'm gonna continue in this game. If the bots are not as good as the previous one, I'm gonna quit.
*GRAVEDIG GRAVEDIG GRAVEDIG*

All bots will must be rebuild. The "PlayerIOClient.dll" will be useless. But that doesn't mean somebody can't build a new SDK for EE Bot development.
It will allow with more simplicity to make online bots power directly by user's browser. No necessity for a bot to be downloaded.
But also if this will happen, it would be more easily someone to make a remake. New hacking methods will be unleashed, by example script injection.
But how the almighty Zumza123 predicts EE will least on flesh easily to 2017.

AmdS · 2015-07-16 17:34:54

Amazing! I'm really curious to know how EE will be left with a giant update! I am hoping this update, and I bet you are too.
I think you have not seen some things in xJeex site (http://xjeex.itch.io/everybody-edits-html5).
Press P is modmode
Press G to fly

-Ub gave me these informations

Br0k3n

Krosis · 2015-07-16 19:52:36

Epic , i hope when the own game changes to html5 the fps be smoother than when i tested, it dosen't fall more than 55 fps
Ps: if you hold space, it will start jumping instantanly, shouldn't it have a delay like the flash EE?

eeisold

drunkbnu · 2015-07-17 00:54:10

60.0 FPS

2015-07-17 04:54:51

Zumza wrote:

But also if this will happen, it would be more easily someone to make a remake. New hacking methods will be unleashed, by example script injection.

WOHOO! I JUST REMEMBERED!

All hail the mighty and all-powerful Atilla, as I am an Atilla-worshipper. May his mighty powers rule over EE! May he be the most powerful guardian of all EE land! Hail! Hail!

YeH Atilla gonna hack its ess off.

Different55 · 2015-07-17 05:05:39

Ornaw? Just because you can read the client side code easier doesn't mean that you can hack the server side of things.

Trung · 2015-07-17 05:55:45

HabboGame wrote:

60.0 FPS

60.7 FPS here lol

Krosis · 2015-07-17 06:07:59

I thought the max was 60 fps due to some limitations (idk if theres limitations)

Xfrogman43 · 2015-07-17 06:10:37

alkazam1448 wrote:

Zumza wrote:
But also if this will happen, it would be more easily someone to make a remake. New hacking methods will be unleashed, by example script injection.
WOHOO! I JUST REMEMBERED!
All hail the mighty and all-powerful Atilla, as I am an Atilla-worshipper. May his mighty powers rule over EE! May he be the most powerful guardian of all EE land! Hail! Hail!
YeH Atilla gonna hack its ess off.

Atilla doesn't care about EE, so he won't do anything to it anymore.
As far as I know anyways

2015-07-17 06:15:29

Xfrogman43 wrote:

alkazam1448 wrote:
Zumza wrote:
But also if this will happen, it would be more easily someone to make a remake. New hacking methods will be unleashed, by example script injection.
WOHOO! I JUST REMEMBERED!
All hail the mighty and all-powerful Atilla, as I am an Atilla-worshipper. May his mighty powers rule over EE! May he be the most powerful guardian of all EE land! Hail! Hail!
YeH Atilla gonna hack its ess off.
Atilla doesn't care about EE, so he won't do anything to it anymore.
As far as I know anyways

You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.

Xfrogman43 · 2015-07-17 09:43:41

alkazam1448 wrote:

You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.

Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?

2015-07-17 10:13:20

Xfrogman43 wrote:

alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?

It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.

drunkbnu · 2015-07-17 13:48:55

http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com … index.html

eeisold · 2015-07-17 14:31:45

alkazam1448 wrote:

Xfrogman43 wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?
It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.

Everything's a possible hypothesis. Yours has little credibility. In the way of argument, you're running some non sequitur.
Having the ability doesn't constitute the guarantee the outcome. E.g., you can give up all your worldly possessions on some spiritual trip. However, you're probably not going to take the journey. Plenty of folks are capable of murder, they aren't stupid enough to go try it.

Also, I get the vibe atilla doesn't care. If he does anything substantial, folks would know where to look. If he didn't, it wouldn't be worth worrying about.
[/derail]

Zumza · 2015-07-17 15:03:33

eeisold wrote:

alkazam1448 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?
It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.
Everything's a possible hypothesis. Yours has little credibility. In the way of argument, you're running some non sequitur.
Having the ability doesn't constitute the guarantee the outcome. E.g., you can give up all your worldly possessions on some spiritual trip. However, you're probably not going to take the journey. Plenty of folks are capable of murder, they aren't stupid enough to go try it.
Also, I get the vibe atilla doesn't care. If he does anything substantial, folks would know where to look. If he didn't, it wouldn't be worth worrying about.
[/derail]

are you trying to say you've never murder? everybody murders...

▼Hidden text

eeisold, 1448

2015-07-17 16:34:09

eeisold wrote:

alkazam1448 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?
It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.
Everything's a possible hypothesis. Yours has little credibility. In the way of argument, you're running some non sequitur.
Having the ability doesn't constitute the guarantee the outcome. E.g., you can give up all your worldly possessions on some spiritual trip. However, you're probably not going to take the journey. Plenty of folks are capable of murder, they aren't stupid enough to go try it.
Also, I get the vibe atilla doesn't care. If he does anything substantial, folks would know where to look. If he didn't, it wouldn't be worth worrying about.
[/derail]

What if? What if Attila comes back? What if someone tells him about the new vulnerable HTML5 ee? Someone who worships Attila, for example, me

Zumza wrote:

eeisold wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?
It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.
Everything's a possible hypothesis. Yours has little credibility. In the way of argument, you're running some non sequitur.
Having the ability doesn't constitute the guarantee the outcome. E.g., you can give up all your worldly possessions on some spiritual trip. However, you're probably not going to take the journey. Plenty of folks are capable of murder, they aren't stupid enough to go try it.
Also, I get the vibe atilla doesn't care. If he does anything substantial, folks would know where to look. If he didn't, it wouldn't be worth worrying about.
[/derail]
are you trying to say you've never murder? everybody murders...
▼Hidden text
poor little butterfly

You mean:

▼Hidden text

Different55 · 2015-07-17 16:48:08

alkazam1448 wrote:

eeisold wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
alkazam1448 wrote:
You can't predict a hacker/god/hun.
Then why are you predicting Atilla is going to come back and hack EE?
It's a really possible hypothesis, since he IS a hacker.
Everything's a possible hypothesis. Yours has little credibility. In the way of argument, you're running some non sequitur.
Having the ability doesn't constitute the guarantee the outcome. E.g., you can give up all your worldly possessions on some spiritual trip. However, you're probably not going to take the journey. Plenty of folks are capable of murder, they aren't stupid enough to go try it.
Also, I get the vibe atilla doesn't care. If he does anything substantial, folks would know where to look. If he didn't, it wouldn't be worth worrying about.
[/derail]
What if? What if Attila comes back? What if someone tells him about the new vulnerable HTML5 ee? Someone who worships Attila, for example, me

Easily readable/modifiable client != vulnerable server.

2015-07-17 17:10:00

Different55 wrote:

Easily readable/modifiable client != vulnerable server.

That would return false.

"!=" is a relational operator, not an assignment operator. "=", "+=", etc. are assignment operators. There is a big difference between them.

▼Hidden text

Different55 · 2015-07-17 17:18:02

alkazam1448 wrote:

Different55 wrote:
Easily readable/modifiable client != vulnerable server.
That would return false.

"!=" is a relational operator, not an assignment operator. "=", "+=", etc. are assignment operators. There is a big difference between them.
▼Hidden text
Relational operators
It checks if something is equal to, not equal to, greater than, lesser than, etc. to another value.
==, !=, >, <, <= and >= are relational operators.
4 > 3 would return true
5 == 2 + 3 would return true
4 != 2 + 2 would return false
Assignment operators
It assigns a value to a variable.
=, +=, -=, *=, /=, %=, <<=, >>=, &=, ^= and |= are the assignment operators.
int num = 5 makes the value of the int num equal to five
num += 4 adds 4 to num

It would return true. That was the point I was making. Having an easily readable and modifiable client does not suddenly make the server vulnerable to attack. Switching to HTML5 will not automatically turn EE into a vulnerable, buggy mess. The client's already modifiable and readable as it is, making it more so won't change much.

eeisold · 2015-07-17 18:12:19

In fact, re-coding could quite possibly fix some bugs. But, if those pushing the server move get lazy, you could end up with more bugs than you started with. I figure an easily modified client would make for some fun skins. If you folks figure out how to make the server capable of verifying user movements (e.g., no moon jumping/super speeding) then you're pretty much in the clear, eh?

Different55

Era · 2015-07-17 19:08:06

That's not that hard to do , ee just wasnt desinged with that in mind.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#51 2015-04-13 23:34:14

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#52 2015-04-14 06:53:57, last edited by xJeex (2015-04-14 07:15:22)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#53 2015-04-14 20:17:04

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#54 2015-07-16 13:20:11

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#55 2015-07-16 14:08:52

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#56 2015-07-16 17:34:54

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#57 2015-07-16 19:52:36, last edited by Krosis (2015-07-16 20:07:57)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#58 2015-07-17 00:54:10

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#59 2015-07-17 04:54:51

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#60 2015-07-17 05:05:39

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#61 2015-07-17 05:55:45

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#62 2015-07-17 06:07:59, last edited by Krosis (2015-07-17 06:19:30)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#63 2015-07-17 06:10:37

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#64 2015-07-17 06:15:29, last edited by 1448 (2015-07-17 06:15:52)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#65 2015-07-17 09:43:41, last edited by Xfrogman43 (2015-07-17 09:44:13)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#66 2015-07-17 10:13:20

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#67 2015-07-17 13:48:55

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#68 2015-07-17 14:31:45

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#69 2015-07-17 15:03:33

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#70 2015-07-17 16:34:09

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#71 2015-07-17 16:48:08

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#72 2015-07-17 17:10:00

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

Relational operators

Assignment operators

#73 2015-07-17 17:18:02, last edited by Different55 (2015-07-17 19:10:50)

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

Relational operators

Assignment operators

#74 2015-07-17 18:12:19

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

#75 2015-07-17 19:08:06

Re: [Client] HTML5 EE - Development Status

Board footer