Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Yea... Gues what, ninja wasnt the only one
This just prooves that we need a more permanent solution then to ban all the accounts assoicated iwth certain accounts
Offline
Hmm. I think I'm going to remove my accountbomber just because of this.
I though they would only use it in their own world. But no.
Offline
Offline
Solution:
1. Threat ninjasupeatsninja a ban if he doesn't give you his bot.
2. Change the bot settings to ban any IP who uses it.
3. Announce the new version of the bot saying you can now hack the code.
4. Have everyone who uses it IP banned.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Funny solution.
@Capasha. Or just require the owner to authenticate a client owning the world before sending the bomb accounts.
(Is that even possible? Now that the new folks screwed with the database, I can't even remember if it's a thing anymore to determine username from user ID)
This just proves that we need a more permanent solution then to ban all the accounts associated with certain accounts
I didn't know you were even banning at all. Good for you! Also dumb for you, as accounts can be generated with ease.
You could copy NVD and scream "IP-ban" and then question if banning IP addresses is what you really need.
(of course, say it first. Don't bother thinking it through)
You also posted the picture with NVD's bomb accounts, yes?
Just sayin'
Those who can't do, teach.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?
For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
Offline
just use a bot and kick them.
or mute them.
or set your world to private.
or ban them from your world.
If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.
Offline
Funny solution.
@Capasha. Or just require the owner to authenticate a client owning the world before sending the bomb accounts.
(Is that even possible? Now that the new folks screwed with the database, I can't even remember if it's a thing anymore to determine username from user ID)This just proves that we need a more permanent solution then to ban all the accounts associated with certain accounts
I didn't know you were even banning at all. Good for you! Also dumb for you, as accounts can be generated with ease.
You could copy NVD and scream "IP-ban" and then question if banning IP addresses is what you really need.
(of course, say it first. Don't bother thinking it through)
You also posted the picture with NVD's bomb accounts, yes?
Just sayin'
It's possible, TiKen's EEpainter ( http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?id=11536 ) has such authentication as well
No u.
Offline
^Good, but I thought EE limits you to two users? While I'm not for certain, I imagine EEpainter doesn't bomb the level and needs the connection.
If users of capasha's bot already have something connected, it wouldn't be able to "authenticate". But, if you could access the database and compare the connecting ID of the 'test client', you wouldn't have to juggle bots.
Or have the owner send an authorizing command (or the code, even). but that's not as magical.
Those who can't do, teach.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?
For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
Offline
/report SCOTT12345
eeisold wrote:Funny solution.
@Capasha. Or just require the owner to authenticate a client owning the world before sending the bomb accounts.
(Is that even possible? Now that the new folks screwed with the database, I can't even remember if it's a thing anymore to determine username from user ID)This just proves that we need a more permanent solution then to ban all the accounts associated with certain accounts
I didn't know you were even banning at all. Good for you! Also dumb for you, as accounts can be generated with ease.
You could copy NVD and scream "IP-ban" and then question if banning IP addresses is what you really need.
(of course, say it first. Don't bother thinking it through)
You also posted the picture with NVD's bomb accounts, yes?
Just sayin'It's possible, TiKen's EEpainter ( http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?id=11536 ) has such authentication as well
Yeah I can do this too. But I'm not going to create a new account bomber. I don't see anything good in that.
Looks like ninja want a ban. He added new account bombs..
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1736941165.2204 - Generated in 0.068 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.68 MiB) ]