Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Just so you know, there IS a property called "BackColor" for almost all Controls.
What colors should I do? I figure this is what your saying.
Offline
Xfrogman43 wrote:Why does your signature say Ninjarbot?
Because he keeps Ninjabot only for himself.
Is this a joke? Or are you being serious... It says "NinjarBot" because it sounds funny. amaRzing amar-zing ninjar ninja-r bot? Eh, I'll change.
Offline
Zumza wrote:Xfrogman43 wrote:Why does your signature say Ninjarbot?
Because he keeps Ninjabot only for himself.
Is this a joke? Or are you being serious... It says "NinjarBot" because it sounds funny. amaRzing amar-zing ninjar ninja-r bot? Eh, I'll change.
Shouldn't it be: rm ninjabot -r
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
ninjasupeatsninja wrote:Zumza wrote:Xfrogman43 wrote:Why does your signature say Ninjarbot?
Because he keeps Ninjabot only for himself.
Is this a joke? Or are you being serious... It says "NinjarBot" because it sounds funny. amaRzing amar-zing ninjar ninja-r bot? Eh, I'll change.
Shouldn't it be: rm ninjabot -r
ok now i don't get anything ur saying
Offline
Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
3d459b6fee6eec5f144bdb756a00af3b
29305aaba23571c898f57aebb55fe2df
723923e9bc614ef90cb8cbcda3b5daa4
Offline
Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
I have 32 bit and it works for me.
Well this is one of the first bots, other than mine, I will test for bugs and such.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
Probably because you don't have .NET framework :3
I have the worst 32-bit and it still works for mine. Even my complex 1448Bot works fine for me.
Offline
I have the worst 32-bit and it still works for mine. Even my complex 1448Bot works fine for me.
Your bot isn't complex.
If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.
Offline
alkazam1448 wrote:I have the worst 32-bit and it still works for mine. Even my complex 1448Bot works fine for me.
Your bot isn't complex.
Compared to Ninjabot it is complex. I mean by the designer.
Offline
Compared to Ninjabot it is complex. I mean by the designer.
That doesn't mean much. I have yet to be amazed by a public bot except for the first few that came out in ee.
If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.
Offline
alkazam1448 wrote:Compared to Ninjabot it is complex. I mean by the designer.
That doesn't mean much. I have yet to be amazed by a public bot except for the first few that came out in ee.
Because all the good ones are private
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Chu chu
http://eejesse.herobo.com/2015-06-28_14-35-42.mp4
Seriously,
Yea bot is perfect for everyday usage of a troller
Offline
Chu chu
http://eejesse.herobo.com/2015-06-28_14-35-42.mp4
Seriously,
Yea bot is perfect for everyday usage of a troller
Oh my god. I hate this bot. Why did he even add bombing on it.
Offline
Coolguy789t wrote:Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
I have 32 bit and it works for me.
Well this is one of the first bots, other than mine, I will test for bugs and such.
▼1▼2▼3▼4▼5▼6▼Extra
Some of these "bugs" are actually features, and "3) Digbot doesn't work [It only builds 2 blocks]", digbot has a Digbot Helper feature, you should really use it. Perhaps you forgot to hit Update All Data.
Features are: 2, and 5. I'll be uploading 5.3 soon.
And when you say the original ideas dont work, are you talking about block army? If so, it's because other players might place the same block.
Offline
Xfrogman43 wrote:Coolguy789t wrote:Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
I have 32 bit and it works for me.
Well this is one of the first bots, other than mine, I will test for bugs and such.
▼1▼2▼3▼4▼5▼6▼ExtraSome of these "bugs" are actually features, and "3) Digbot doesn't work [It only builds 2 blocks]", digbot has a Digbot Helper feature, you should really use it. Perhaps you forgot to hit Update All Data.
"features" KEK. Just say that you can't fix them, it's okay.
Offline
ninjasupeatsninja wrote:Xfrogman43 wrote:Coolguy789t wrote:Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
I have 32 bit and it works for me.
Well this is one of the first bots, other than mine, I will test for bugs and such.
▼1▼2▼3▼4▼5▼6▼ExtraSome of these "bugs" are actually features, and "3) Digbot doesn't work [It only builds 2 blocks]", digbot has a Digbot Helper feature, you should really use it. Perhaps you forgot to hit Update All Data.
"features" KEK. Just say that you can't fix them, it's okay.
for most of these its a try { } catch { }
Offline
Chu chu
http://eejesse.herobo.com/2015-06-28_14-35-42.mp4
Seriously,
Yea bot is perfect for everyday usage of a troller
I guess i'll add a "Anti-Bomb" checkbox into it. You click it and bombs will be kicked, but they won't go onto the ban list.
Offline
What? how do you think that would help? just disconnect the bot if its not the owner
if (m.Type == "init" && m.GetBoolean(14) == false)
{
connection.Disconnect();
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Please connect this bot as worldowner");
}
Then you cannot spam worlds which you do not own (never used the code tag before)
Offline
What? how do you think that would help? just disconnect the bot if its not the owner
if (m.Type == "init" && m.GetBoolean(14) == false) { connection.Disconnect(); System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Please connect this bot as worldowner"); }
Then you cannot spam worlds which you do not own (never used the code tag before)
The anti-bomb feature will be open source, if you want me to.
Offline
Instead of giving everyone a schield against the bombs , how about dissarming the bombs? it'll be way more cost effective
Offline
Instead of giving everyone a schield against the bombs , how about dissarming the bombs? it'll be way more cost effective
I like it as a quick way to get the level popular.
Offline
Era wrote:Instead of giving everyone a schield against the bombs , how about dissarming the bombs? it'll be way more cost effective
I like it as a quick way to get the level popular.
Popular? Since when?
When I see a world full of these names I quit faster.
Offline
Era wrote:Instead of giving everyone a schield against the bombs , how about dissarming the bombs? it'll be way more cost effective
I like it as a quick way to get the level popular.
Bombing is one of the worst abusive functions that were ever added to bots.
It would've been added to the flash client if it was a "quick way to get the level popular".
Offline
ZeldaXD wrote:ninjasupeatsninja wrote:Xfrogman43 wrote:Coolguy789t wrote:Hey ninja can you make this for 32bit please? I really want this bot and I am at a 32bit computer
I have 32 bit and it works for me.
Well this is one of the first bots, other than mine, I will test for bugs and such.
▼1▼2▼3▼4▼5▼6▼ExtraSome of these "bugs" are actually features, and "3) Digbot doesn't work [It only builds 2 blocks]", digbot has a Digbot Helper feature, you should really use it. Perhaps you forgot to hit Update All Data.
"features" KEK. Just say that you can't fix them, it's okay.
for most of these its a try { } catch { }
Are you bimpsing kidding me?
http://eejesse.herobo.com/2015-06-28_18-14-06.mp4
Such quality, such wow.
Offline
try {
conection.send("say","Seriously? you want every bimps player to make a bot for themselves just so they can kick your bomb players?
you are the one who has to make sure that the bombs dont join into other people's worlds -.-
i even gave you a very simple piece of code that would just accomplish that");
}
catch { System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Unhandled error occured , please try again later"); }
(atleast he try ed)
Offline
[ Started around 1732707906.2563 - Generated in 0.158 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 2.02 MiB (Peak: 2.4 MiB) ]