Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Is it possible to calculate the answers of a multiple choice test if they are ordered using a pseudo-random algorithm?
Offline
If you know the algorithm they used to generate random numbers and the seed (if any) they used, then yeah.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I can count on my fingers how many multiple choice test, teachers gave me.
The most funny one was:
return 1;
Yes all the correct answers was a)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
If you know the algorithm they used to generate random numbers and the seed (if any) they used, then yeah.
^
I think that a lot of pseudo-random number generators use the time to create a random number (because the time is always changing, so you get a different number every time). So I think that it would be practically impossible to predict test answers in this way, if they used this kind of thing.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
In other words, if you are able to replicate the pseudorandom numbers then you will know the pseudorandom numbers.
Offline
If you know the algorithm they used to generate random numbers and the seed (if any) they used, then yeah.
What if I made the test myself going "Hm... have I used 'c' too much? I think this one will be C!"
Offline
Different55 wrote:If you know the algorithm they used to generate random numbers and the seed (if any) they used, then yeah.
What if I made the test myself going "Hm... have I used 'c' too much? I think this one will be C!"
In that case we'll need either a psychic or a stealthy midget.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738944324.8767 - Generated in 0.039 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.6 MiB) ]