Woot stats

skullz17 · 2015-04-27 18:15:13

N1KF please just stop. It seemed like a joke at first, but I didn't realise you were actually gonna take it this far ._. . Next time you enjoy a post, how will you show it? You would have already wooted even if it supported Hitler, so that woot is meaningless. Plus, it's just annoying to see your woots everywhere.

Different55, N1KF, Creature, some woman, Anch

some woman · 2015-04-27 18:31:22

maybe we should just remove all of xfrogman, anch159 and n1kf's woots and remove their ability to woot if their signs of appreciation are meaningless

Anch

N1KF · 2015-04-27 18:59:20

Two more topics...in...Forum Business...wooting so slow...

Anch

Different55 · 2015-04-27 19:06:14

People asked you politely to stop doing something that irritated them. What is possessing you to keep on going?

N1KF, some woman, Anch

N1KF · 2015-04-27 19:18:51

Different55 wrote:

People asked you politely to stop doing something that irritated them. What is possessing you to keep on going?

I have one topic left, so why should I stop now? That would be like building almost an entire house, but leaving one space for a brick open because people are annoyed at the location of the house. Simply placing the brick would result in more satisfaction and completion than it would negatively on other people. Why is it that one topic disturbs you so much, especially if said topic is not even that entertaining to read through anyway?

skullz17 · 2015-04-27 19:25:56

Is wooting really that satisfying? I personally don't care if you finish wooting that topic, but I just don't understand how one can find pleasure in just wooting a bunch of topics.

some woman, Anch

N1KF · 2015-04-27 19:29:36

skullz17 wrote:

Is wooting really that satisfying? I personally don't care if you finish wooting that topic, but I just don't understand how one can find pleasure in just wooting a bunch of topics.

Because having your name written in a bunch of obscure topics is just that satisfying

Anch

Different55 · 2015-04-27 19:44:08

N1KF wrote:

Different55 wrote:
People asked you politely to stop doing something that irritated them. What is possessing you to keep on going?
I have one topic left, so why should I stop now? That would be like building almost an entire house, but leaving one space for a brick open because people are annoyed at the location of the house. Simply placing the brick would result in more satisfaction and completion than it would negatively on other people. Why is it that one topic disturbs you so much, especially if said topic is not even that entertaining to read through anyway?

It's not even about the brick. A brick makes no difference to them. People asked you (politely) to stop building houses.

Anch

N1KF · 2015-04-27 19:47:40

okdonenomoretalkingdramaover

Anch

some woman · 2015-04-27 20:13:43

some man wrote:

maybe we should just remove all of xfrogman, anch159 and n1kf's woots and remove their ability to woot if their signs of appreciation are meaningless

Anch

Anch · 2015-04-27 20:21:51

skullz17 wrote:

Is wooting really that satisfying? I personally don't care if you finish wooting that topic, but I just don't understand how one can find pleasure in just wooting a bunch of topics.

It just IS

N1KF

Onjit · 2015-04-27 22:32:13

i've stopped spamwooting so my woots will have some semblance of meaning

Bobithan, some woman, Anch

some woman · 2015-04-27 23:07:43

anch159 wrote:

skullz17 wrote:
Is wooting really that satisfying? I personally don't care if you finish wooting that topic, but I just don't understand how one can find pleasure in just wooting a bunch of topics.
It just IS

come on dude
don't let your obsessive compulsive disorder overtake your privilege of being able to woot things properly

Anch

Hexagon · 2015-04-27 23:48:28

I'm thinking about making a Chrome Extension that hides woots.

I might do that soon.

N1KF, Anch

N1KF · 2015-04-27 23:53:03

Hexagon wrote:

I'm thinking about making a Chrome Extension that hides woots.

I might do that soon.

I would also like to see a blacklist feature, perhaps only having their username appear if somebody else also (non-blacklisted) wooted the post.

Anch

Pingohits · 2015-04-28 00:30:08

Different55 wrote:

1. N1KF 16820
2. Xfrogman43 8341
3. anch159 1481
4. Onjit 759
5. skullz17 489
6. some man 476
7. gkaby 353
8. Pingohits 308
9. Different55 300
10. Bobithan 275
Displaying 10/231 wooters.
Completed in 0.29453587532043
We ended up with a lot of the same names, but way different numbers.
I compared the two and it looks like your numbers are usually ~18x higher than mine, except for the spamwooters who were only off by 4 or 5. I really hope it's because of a programming problem and not because they wooted enough since you posted your numbers to close the gap between 18x and 5x.

you guys woot so much

this isn't healthy guys

go outside

and also n1kf is getting an intervention on 4/29/2015 at exactly 5:00 pm EST, so be there

Anch · 2015-04-28 00:37:06

Pingohits wrote:

Different55 wrote:
1. N1KF 16820
2. Xfrogman43 8341
3. anch159 1481
4. Onjit 759
5. skullz17 489
6. some man 476
7. gkaby 353
8. Pingohits 308
9. Different55 300
10. Bobithan 275
Displaying 10/231 wooters.
Completed in 0.29453587532043
We ended up with a lot of the same names, but way different numbers.
I compared the two and it looks like your numbers are usually ~18x higher than mine, except for the spamwooters who were only off by 4 or 5. I really hope it's because of a programming problem and not because they wooted enough since you posted your numbers to close the gap between 18x and 5x.
you guys woot so much
this isn't healthy guys
go outside
and also n1kf is getting an intervention on 4/29/2015 at exactly 5:00 pm EST, so be there

It is healthy because I eat while I woot
Now dont use that picture of the guy sipping coffee by his laptop

Pingohits · 2015-04-28 00:41:06

anch159 wrote:

Pingohits wrote:
Different55 wrote:
1. N1KF 16820
2. Xfrogman43 8341
3. anch159 1481
4. Onjit 759
5. skullz17 489
6. some man 476
7. gkaby 353
8. Pingohits 308
9. Different55 300
10. Bobithan 275
Displaying 10/231 wooters.
Completed in 0.29453587532043
We ended up with a lot of the same names, but way different numbers.
I compared the two and it looks like your numbers are usually ~18x higher than mine, except for the spamwooters who were only off by 4 or 5. I really hope it's because of a programming problem and not because they wooted enough since you posted your numbers to close the gap between 18x and 5x.
you guys woot so much
this isn't healthy guys
go outside
and also n1kf is getting an intervention on 4/29/2015 at exactly 5:00 pm EST, so be there
It is healthy because I eat while I woot

this is the nutrition label for edible woots

yeaa not so much

Onjit, Anch

Anch · 2015-04-28 00:42:32

Pingohits wrote:

anch159 wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Different55 wrote:
1. N1KF 16820
2. Xfrogman43 8341
3. anch159 1481
4. Onjit 759
5. skullz17 489
6. some man 476
7. gkaby 353
8. Pingohits 308
9. Different55 300
10. Bobithan 275
Displaying 10/231 wooters.
Completed in 0.29453587532043
We ended up with a lot of the same names, but way different numbers.
I compared the two and it looks like your numbers are usually ~18x higher than mine, except for the spamwooters who were only off by 4 or 5. I really hope it's because of a programming problem and not because they wooted enough since you posted your numbers to close the gap between 18x and 5x.
you guys woot so much
this isn't healthy guys
go outside
and also n1kf is getting an intervention on 4/29/2015 at exactly 5:00 pm EST, so be there
It is healthy because I eat while I woot
this is the nutrition label for edible woots

yeaa not so much

No I don't eat the woots I said I eat WHILE I woot

Onjit

tak4n · 2015-05-01 11:50:49

You guys are all missing the point. The wooting system is becoming into the old rep system. Only need to add - wooting so we can start supporting Chewy again

Different55, Ratburntro44, N1KF, Xfrogman43, skullz17

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#51 2015-04-27 18:15:13

Re: Woot stats

#52 2015-04-27 18:31:22

Re: Woot stats

#53 2015-04-27 18:59:20, last edited by N1KF (2015-04-27 18:59:38)

Re: Woot stats

#54 2015-04-27 19:06:14

Re: Woot stats

#55 2015-04-27 19:18:51

Re: Woot stats

#56 2015-04-27 19:25:56

Re: Woot stats

#57 2015-04-27 19:29:36

Re: Woot stats

#58 2015-04-27 19:44:08, last edited by Different55 (2015-04-27 19:52:03)

Re: Woot stats

#59 2015-04-27 19:47:40

Re: Woot stats

#60 2015-04-27 20:13:43

Re: Woot stats

#61 2015-04-27 20:21:51

Re: Woot stats

#62 2015-04-27 22:32:13

Re: Woot stats

#63 2015-04-27 23:07:43

Re: Woot stats

#64 2015-04-27 23:48:28

Re: Woot stats

#65 2015-04-27 23:53:03

Re: Woot stats

#66 2015-04-28 00:30:08

Re: Woot stats

#67 2015-04-28 00:37:06, last edited by Anch (2015-04-28 00:37:33)

Re: Woot stats

#68 2015-04-28 00:41:06

Re: Woot stats

#69 2015-04-28 00:42:32

Re: Woot stats

#70 2015-05-01 11:50:49

Re: Woot stats

Board footer