Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
I made a bot called R42Bot++.
Download: http://realmaster42-projects.weebly.com/r42bot1.html
GitHub Source: https://github.com/realmaster42/R42Bot
Trello [Not official upcoming features]: https://trello.com/b/bs7b8Flx/r42bot
https://github.com/realmaster42/R42Bot/ … 2?expand=1
'This bot has a lack of organization! (...)', already a work in progress
Hired
----------
SPOT FREE
SPOT FREE
Rejected
----------
Zumza
The new developer will have to have the following:
-Knowdlenge of basic C# syntax (incluiding #region, #endregion)
-Knowdlenge of making bots for EE
-No raging
-Only editing on github source
R42Bot++ is a multi-function bot made by realmaster(marcoantonimsantos). It's name is R42Bot++ because:
1st. R42Bot=realmaster42, old name for EE2
2nd. ++=Continuation of R42Bot. That bot is abandoned and still functional for EE.
Any feedback about the bot be free to comment, but i would like another developer.
(This is the last spot)
Offline
Well, vitalijus, making bots isn't easy. (While making some complex stuff it isnt).
And more than one person working, leads to faster and better work.
Offline
I was going to help, but then I realized how horrible the code was... have you heard classes... or any form of organization...?
I'm assuming you're "hiring" a developer just because you don't understand how to do something.
Also... Weebly *sigh*.
(P.S. Please don't steal our avatar. )
Offline
I was going to say the same. The code needs a clean up. Or just start from the beginning.
Offline
Uhhh. Maybe he wants to be hired?
Will you gonna pay us? 5$ per month for me.(2 hours per day)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I was going to help, but then I realized how horrible the code was... have you heard classes... or any form of organization...?
I'm assuming you're "hiring" a developer just because you don't understand how to do something.
Also... Weebly *sigh*.(P.S. Please don't steal our avatar. )
Lol Yeahh im so amazed how clean masterbot is :3 this r42bot should be rebuilt, like what i do to my own bot.
Offline
I was going to help, but then I realized how horrible the code was... have you heard classes... or any form of organization...?
I'm assuming you're "hiring" a developer just because you don't understand how to do something.
Also... Weebly *sigh*.(P.S. Please don't steal our avatar. )
have you heard of #regions?
Offline
have you heard of #regions?
As a general rule of thumb functions should never be longer than the height of your screen. Regions only put the problem deeper, they don't actually provide any form of organization other than labeling a large cluster of unorganized code.
Offline
lrussell wrote:I was going to help, but then I realized how horrible the code was... have you heard classes... or any form of organization...?
I'm assuming you're "hiring" a developer just because you don't understand how to do something.
Also... Weebly *sigh*.(P.S. Please don't steal our avatar. )
have you heard of #regions?
Yes I have and they're not a sufficient method of organization.
Offline
marcoantonimsantos wrote:lrussell wrote:I was going to help, but then I realized how horrible the code was... have you heard classes... or any form of organization...?
I'm assuming you're "hiring" a developer just because you don't understand how to do something.
Also... Weebly *sigh*.(P.S. Please don't steal our avatar. )
have you heard of #regions?
Yes I have and they're not a sufficient method of organization.
And how do you want me to organizate it?
First make you a version of the organizated code.
Don't blame me, blame Visual Studio for lack of organization chances.
Offline
lrussell wrote:marcoantonimsantos wrote:have you heard of #regions?
Yes I have and they're not a sufficient method of organization.
And how do you want me to organizate it?
First make you a version of the organizated code.
Don't blame me, blame Visual Studio for lack of organization chances.
-> Right click on project name
-> Hovers over "Add"
-> Clicks "Class..."
Or, try the shortcut Shift+Alt+C.
Offline
Ohh i get it. Updated. Check github.
Offline
So you hire me or not?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Offline
Uhhh. Maybe he wants to be hired?
Will you gonna pay us? 5$ per month for me.(2 hours per day)
No, i don't pay... but i give credits and surely give you full permissions for the bot except claim you made it
Im making this bot for the community... so won't be for paying.
Also, if you have teamviewer tell me your email in PM ill send you a request. (realmaster42)
Offline
Sneak Peak
Offline
No, i don't pay... but i give credits and surely give you full permissions for the bot except claim you made it
This is an contradiction... How can I contribute without make it?
Also why not implement an SDK by example Fluid?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I looked at code...
I really don't want to be involved in this type of project.
I seen that the only reason about this bot is to make you THE GOD of all worlds that use it. I will don't be surprise if you will copy the emails and passwords of users.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
https://github.com/realmaster42/R42Bot/ … 36d5d48626
ohoewrwyohwrhewriheworhoewhoerooehtoghrho
Offline
I looked at code...
I really don't want to be involved in this type of project.
I seen that the only reason about this bot is to make you THE GOD of all worlds that use it. I will don't be surprise if you will copy the emails and passwords of users.
1. dude.. i give credits, i meant, im the true owner (idea for bot), and you are sub-owner,
2. SDKs are for noobs that don't know how to code by themselfes,
3. stealing password and email is impossible for EE.
Zumza, you don't have the needed maturity to be hired, sorry.
Offline
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Ohh i get it. Updated. Check github.
Well, it's a start I guess.
Yup. Go check the new code
It's going pretty well.
Offline
[ Started around 1732214761.004 - Generated in 0.152 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.79 MiB (Peak: 2.05 MiB) ]