Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
He added the X-mas smiley...
Except,it is not in the X-mas pack! Its 50 Gems! Wow! He's really greedy -.-
Discuss.
Edit: I Failed! Big time! I didn't know if it as in the pack or not,sorry guys
Last edited by Pawlowic (Jul 16 2011 2:38:20 am)
it's not a fail. They were separate before, and I'm glad they're separate now. Means less people will get it which means it's got more value for the people who got it when they were supposed to.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
It was indeed separate, and also a bit older than the X-mas decorations as well. Not much to discuss.
50 gems isn't greedy imo... its only $5 or 2 surveys...
I have it mwhahahahaha, aslo rpg said in another post it takes $40,000 to run ee and the guys gotta eat!
Last edited by treejoe4 (Jul 15 2011 2:08:40 pm)
He may have added that.. But he didn't managed to fix the bugs.. again..
Especially this huge glitch where there's this classic tab where people can get smileys and blocks that aren't supposed to be bought anymore. This one needs to be fixed quickly before too many people exploit it.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
wow... look to get the whole pack... 150 gems... that's kind of crazy you know? 15 dollars. like. wow. and dont tell me 6 surveys... surveys can take quite a while and then not reward anything.
you shouldn't be getting it at all imvso(in my very strong opinion)
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
^We should^. I bought santa smiley today .
you shouldn't be getting it at all imvso(in my very strong opinion)
I have to agree. The only reason they were brought back is because newbies were complaining too much and spamming topics about it. There was a reason these items were labeled limited time, and they should have stuck to it.
At TP, good for you. Meh.
Obligatory piece of text placed here forcing you to load an extra 100 bytes of data per post I make.
Offline
If you didn't get it when it was limited time only you shouldn't get it at all. He said it was limited time only so we all scrambled to get them before time was up. Then he extends it, but we all go along because it's still limited time only. Then now it's SURPRISE! You just wasted your time. You didn't have to get on every 8 hours after all! It's not special anymore. If he's going to do that with limited time only smileys, what's stopping him from doing it with contest-only smileys?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I honestly think that should should be able to buy them next year, instead of some random date.
but then it would be like "2012" pack.
Well, can't we at least be thankful there's some sort of practical way to get them?
Fifty gems is not THAT much, actually. I had to pay a hundred gems for the Christmas decorations when they were first released in the winter because back then I hated energy.
Well, can't we at least be thankful there's some sort of practical way to get them?
No. Not when we already got them in time. Look at other games. What about Gaia Online. Their limited time items are limited time items. They don't come back. Same with Runescape, WoW, and pretty much every other game with items.
Last edited by Different55 (Jul 15 2011 4:40:24 pm)
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Yeah, its a bit dumb to name them limited while you add them a half year later in the shop again.
They should remain exclusive to let others see that you play the game for so long
Offline
Offline
I think it should be available for gems only for the members who registered before they were released, but missed out at getting it. I think this would be fair imo.
Last edited by Cyclopsicle (Jul 15 2011 4:49:27 pm)
Sabrillian wrote:Well, can't we at least be thankful there's some sort of practical way to get them?
No. Not when we already got them in time. Look at other games. What about Gaia Online. Their limited time items are limited time items. They don't come back. Same with Runescape, WoW, and pretty much every other game with items.
You have a point there, actually. I was pretty bummed when they were re-released but I got over it.
It's a pretty awkward situation with the classic tab, so I'd have to say I'm neutral.
ya see, problem is he released 2 items that were limited time at the same time. and that caused a problem. both expired in the time it took to get 1 with energy. and people were mad. so it makes sense to release again, but not to separate the santa smiley and the xmas.
ya see, problem is he released 2 items that were limited time at the same time. and that caused a problem. both expired in the time it took to get 1 with energy. and people were mad. so it makes sense to release again, but not to separate the santa smiley and the xmas.
There was enough time to get both with energy, but lots of people just couldn't manage getting on to do so. The two items were separate in the beginning, so they will stay separated. As I already stated, the only reason they were re-released was because newbies were raging and spamming topics about it.
Obligatory piece of text placed here forcing you to load an extra 100 bytes of data per post I make.
Offline
I think it should be available for gems only for the members who registered before they were released, but missed out at getting it. I think this would be fair imo.
I think I could live with this. Until then, we storm chris' house.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
well gl with that... the ee community will be **** if he changes it now they'll be like omfg! i did like 10000000000000000 surveys and like got 99 gems and like he totally changed it wtf.
They should deal widdit.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
[ Started around 1732557294.5016 - Generated in 0.065 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.6 MiB (Peak: 1.8 MiB) ]