Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Do you like it?Please rate it
I'd say its okay, 6/10
Offline
Can you do better
Did I say that? Nope, just because I don't say: "OMGWTFBBQ THAT IS DA BIG SIG EVAH!!!!!!100/10!!!!!!!!" doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I gave my opinion & rating, you asked for that and you got it.
Offline
Did I say that? Nope, just because I don't say: "OMGWTFBBQ THAT IS DA BIG SIG EVAH!!!!!!100/10!!!!!!!!" doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I gave my opinion & rating, you asked for that and you got it.
...I think someone here is on crack.
He isn't being a jerk about it, he was just wondering what improvements you can possibly implement it to make it a 10/10.
kingpooultra wrote:Did I say that? Nope, just because I don't say: "OMGWTFBBQ THAT IS DA BIG SIG EVAH!!!!!!100/10!!!!!!!!" doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I gave my opinion & rating, you asked for that and you got it.
...I think someone here is on crack.
He isn't being a jerk about it, he was just wondering what improvements you can possibly implement it to make it a 10/10.
bs.
Can you do better
Sounds snotty to me, he is clearly asking if I can do a better sig, cause I gave it 6/10. Not asking if I can improve it.
...I think someone here is on crack.*cough*GadgetGeek*cough cough*
Offline
GadgetGeek wrote:kingpooultra wrote:Did I say that? Nope, just because I don't say: "OMGWTFBBQ THAT IS DA BIG SIG EVAH!!!!!!100/10!!!!!!!!" doesn't mean you have to be a jerk about it. I gave my opinion & rating, you asked for that and you got it.
...I think someone here is on crack.
He isn't being a jerk about it, he was just wondering what improvements you can possibly implement it to make it a 10/10.
bs.
Burnett wrote:Can you do better
Sounds snotty to me, he is clearly asking if I can do a better sig, cause I gave it 6/10. Not asking if I can improve it.
...I think someone here is on crack.*cough*GadgetGeek*cough cough*
Lolno.
Better = Improve.
Are you sure you're fine?
7/10 there and ^lol
Player Since 2011. I used to make bots and stuff.
Offline
kingpooultra wrote:GadgetGeek wrote:...I think someone here is on crack.
He isn't being a jerk about it, he was just wondering what improvements you can possibly implement it to make it a 10/10.
bs.
Burnett wrote:Can you do better
Sounds snotty to me, he is clearly asking if I can do a better sig, cause I gave it 6/10. Not asking if I can improve it.
...I think someone here is on crack.*cough*GadgetGeek*cough cough*
Lolno.
Better = Improve.
Are you sure you're fine?
This amuses me, if he wanted to see if I could improve that he would have said that. Yes I'm fine, but I think your having some sickness.
Offline
GadgetGeek wrote:kingpooultra wrote:bs.
Sounds snotty to me, he is clearly asking if I can do a better sig, cause I gave it 6/10. Not asking if I can improve it....I think someone here is on crack.*cough*GadgetGeek*cough cough*
Lolno.
Better = Improve.
Are you sure you're fine?
This amuses me, if he wanted to see if I could improve that he would have said that. Yes I'm fine, but I think your having some sickness.
You're not even looking at my posts.
Better = Improve.
Can you do better
=
Can you improve it
Nice : 7,5 / 10
kingpooultra wrote:GadgetGeek wrote:Lolno.
Better = Improve.
Are you sure you're fine?
This amuses me, if he wanted to see if I could improve that he would have said that. Yes I'm fine, but I think your having some sickness.
You're not even looking at my posts.
Better = Improve.
Burnett wrote:Can you do better
=
Burnett wrote:Can you improve it
He's right o.o(from Eddsworld,WTFuture | Lucky Can Founding scene)
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1734678557.6712 - Generated in 0.076 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.67 MiB) ]