Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
So I'm going to begin using a new "logo" that will be in all of my signatures and avatars, the only difference being changed unfocused backgrounds.
My signature changes randomly upon refresh, so here are the images used in it and the dates they were added.
Special thanks to Cyral for helping me with the random image selecting php code.
mm/dd/yyyy
04/08/15
03/17/15
02/15/15
01/19/15
01/03/2015
12/27/2014
12/20/2014
Last edited by BuzzerBee (Jan 19 2015 3:31:50 pm)
Offline
I am vibrating furiously with ecstasy and flabbergastation
*falls to floor and climbs up table*
*reaches slowly for keyboard and types*
10/10
Offline
Updated. Also I'm planning on doing something really cool with my signature soon, so stay tuned
Offline
Updated. Also I'm planning on doing something really cool with my signature soon, so stay tuned
You know that really cool thing? I've done it.
Last edited by BuzzerBee (Jan 19 2015 3:31:14 pm)
Offline
you..changed the background and your avatar?
Offline
you..changed the background and your avatar?
Give the page a quick refresh (;
Offline
ah! Sig rotator very clever
although ive already done it
my rotator currently has 42 images
Offline
ah! Sig rotator very clever
although ive already done it
my rotator currently has 42 images
Nice, did you make it with PHP?
Offline
Pingohits wrote:ah! Sig rotator very clever
although ive already done it
my rotator currently has 42 images
Nice, did you make it with PHP?
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:Pingohits wrote:ah! Sig rotator very clever
although ive already done it
my rotator currently has 42 images
Nice, did you make it with PHP?
I use that too but the website sounds very weird...
Please tell me what it is...
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:Pingohits wrote:ah! Sig rotator very clever
although ive already done it
my rotator currently has 42 images
Nice, did you make it with PHP?
Oh that's a pretty cool site, I've never heard of it.
Offline
Pingohits wrote:BuzzerBee wrote:Nice, did you make it with PHP?
I use that too but the website sounds very weird...
Please tell me what it is...
basically you just make your own account and put picture links inside the white boxes. Then, copy and paste the link it gave you into your signature area..place. Then the magic happens.
Offline
I have never noticed the background change to be honest.
I was going for subtle
Offline
Mouseh wrote:I have never noticed the background change to be honest.
I was going for subtle
I think you mean subtlety.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:Mouseh wrote:I have never noticed the background change to be honest.
I was going for subtle
I think you mean subtlety.
No, I meant subtle. If you read further into it, you may see that I meant, "I was going for subtle changes in the background." The abstract noun ("the changes in the background") was implied. It's like if one says, "How did you decorate the room?" and you reply, "I was going for minimalistic." You could say, "I was going for a minimalistic design for the room," but that's redundant, so you would leave it to be implied.
Pls
Last edited by BuzzerBee (Jan 28 2015 1:41:55 am)
Offline
skullz16 wrote:BuzzerBee wrote:I was going for subtle
I think you mean subtlety.
No, I meant subtle. If you read further into it, you may see that I meant, "I was going for subtle changes in the background." The abstract noun ("the changes in the background") was implied. It's like if one says, "How did you decorate the room?" and you reply, "I was going for minimalistic." You could say, "I was going for a minimalistic design for the room," but that's redundant, so you would leave it to be implied.
Both are acceptable. In you example, a possible response could be "I was going for minimalism"
:.|:;
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:skullz16 wrote:I think you mean subtlety.
No, I meant subtle. If you read further into it, you may see that I meant, "I was going for subtle changes in the background." The abstract noun ("the changes in the background") was implied. It's like if one says, "How did you decorate the room?" and you reply, "I was going for minimalistic." You could say, "I was going for a minimalistic design for the room," but that's redundant, so you would leave it to be implied.
Both are acceptable. In you example, a possible response could be "I was going for minimalism"
Exactly.
Offline
skullz16 wrote:BuzzerBee wrote:I was going for subtle
I think you mean subtlety.
No, I meant subtle. If you read further into it, you may see that I meant, "I was going for subtle changes in the background." The abstract noun ("the changes in the background") was implied. It's like if one says, "How did you decorate the room?" and you reply, "I was going for minimalistic." You could say, "I was going for a minimalistic design for the room," but that's redundant, so you would leave it to be implied.
Pls
oh i see
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:skullz16 wrote:I think you mean subtlety.
No, I meant subtle. If you read further into it, you may see that I meant, "I was going for subtle changes in the background." The abstract noun ("the changes in the background") was implied. It's like if one says, "How did you decorate the room?" and you reply, "I was going for minimalistic." You could say, "I was going for a minimalistic design for the room," but that's redundant, so you would leave it to be implied.
Pls
oh i see
i don't think so
Offline
Just added:
02/15/15
Offline
I tried to make one for you.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Just added:
02/15/15
https://st0rage.org/~kylerm/signature/images/sig5.pngWill update OP when my account is merged
Start updating.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I tried to make one for you.
10/10
buzzer you should add this to your april fool's sig
Offline
[ Started around 1734578008.1257 - Generated in 0.103 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.17 MiB) ]