Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
So SOMEONE has been editing the wiki to be highly opinionated instead of objective, and everyone should know that the wiki is not the place to say what you think about stuff. Look at this:
"January 2013
In this month, EE has been subject to even more controversy, due to the zombie potions that are known for being used to troll minigame worlds, bosses, etc, because once you set it and if the world continues to be popular, it will never end. A protection potion was also released and subject to controversy, as it allowed users to cheat for 30 seconds by walking on hazards. The respawn potion was again, not welcomed, because it no longer allows the /respawn command, and people are unhappy they have to pay energy to respawn. "
This is very unprofessional. Instead, it should be like this:
"In this month, EE became subject to even more controversy, due to the zombie potions that could be used to slow down yourself, and anyone you touch. This greatly revolutionized gameplay and lead to many levels designed to be for "zombie survival". A protection potion was also released that allowed users for 30 seconds to walk on hazards. To prevent people from skipping parts of a level or zombifying people when that isn't the goal of the level, owners were also given the ability to turn off certain or all potions. The respawn potion was also added and could be used to respawn oneself at any time, replacing the /respawn command.
I say that people should do a sweep of the wiki and remove all the stuff that someone added when they were throwing a fit.
Offline
Why do you even check the wiki?
Also, look in the edit history.
Offline
Which wiki?
Offline
That's life for you. Biased opinions forcefully shared across the world.
Create a new wiki then.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
@krubby
The Wiki isn't protected, anyone can edit it, so....... fix things you see as incorrect.
Create a new wiki then.
Unless a wiki is locked (like the useless and outdated one at forumify), you should never just create another one. The point of a wiki is collaborative work, by creating more, you would be spreading the limited users and make the content suffer.
Offline
(I thought about making a topic about reviving that wiki, but I guess this topic will do.)
We should get some professional wiki editors to fix the wiki and make it much better and with my content.
Offline
Squad wrote:Create a new wiki then.
Unless a wiki is locked (like the useless and outdated one at forumify), you should never just create another one. The point of a wiki is collaborative work, by creating more, you would be spreading the limited users and make the content suffer.
I was basically making a point, that noone is going to make another wiki.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
No body cares about the wiki, tbh.
Speak for yourself, I go on the wiki and edit things from time to time...
I edit on the Wikia version of the EE wiki.
The wiki is amazing. I had so much fun being the first every time updating the magic class page on wiki. Felt epic knowing I was the first until I saw doh's post on gregregreg's topic. Made me realize that I wouldn't be first to class 12 because I stopped collecting 20 magic coins a day. Was still fun while it lasted and the wiki made it even more enjoyable.
Offline
I haven't been on the wiki in years... But I'll help edit things if necessary.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732221593.4659 - Generated in 0.067 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.53 MiB (Peak: 1.69 MiB) ]