Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#26 Before February 2015

doomy64
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Fiendish Llama wrote:

Chrome. 'Nuff Said.

#27 Before February 2015

Jeremifier
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Supadorf is a mod too now? Supa, I thought you were inactive on these forums?

#28 Before February 2015

JadElClemens
Member
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,559

Re: Mod conflict

He was relatively inactive, iirc. Besides, we weren't picked based on how active we were (although people that were totally inactive obviously wouldn't have been good choices).


4RNmJ.png

I hate tall signatures.

Offline

#29 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

All you nubs who say Chrome are just scared of the POWER of Opera. Too many options for you to handle I guess. Chrome doesn't even have an advanced config page.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#30 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Tried both, both ugly. Maxthon works especially slow on my computer, and Opera [along with FX] is too blocky.


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#31 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

Opera? Blocky? What are you smoking? Even if you did screw something up so bad that it's blocky all you need to do is download a new skin. Just click Download, wait a few seconds, and your new skin will have installed itself without a restart or anything.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#32 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Well, convince the majority here - I personally enjoy the speed and simplicity of Chrome while you may enjoy the flexibility of Opera.

And if I may, you might be interested in this or this study if you're interested in speed tests.


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#33 Before February 2015

Shift
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

TakoMan02 wrote:

Tried both, both ugly. Maxthon works especially slow on my computer, and Opera [along with FX] is too blocky.

Wow, it's rare that we agree. Chrome actually isn't my first choice, but it's probably my second; it may be basic, but it's very fast.

#34 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

Tako: In none of those tests has Opera been tweaked. Chrome doesn't even have the ability to be easily tweaked. And if you want UI simplicity you can remove/reorganize buttons until they fit your taste. I took out the address bar and moved it to the status bar along with the rest of the buttons I use. I moved the red Opera button, too. They all shrunk themselves, but they're all still completely usable. I have a lot more space, and I used attractive dividers to separate types of buttons in the status bar. It's all tiny and simple.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#35 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Different55 wrote:

Tako: In none of those tests has Opera been tweaked. Chrome doesn't even have the ability to be easily tweaked. And if you want UI simplicity you can remove/reorganize buttons until they fit your taste. I took out the address bar and moved it to the status bar along with the rest of the buttons I use. I moved the red Opera button, too. They all shrunk themselves, but they're all still completely usable. I have a lot more space, and I used attractive dividers to separate types of buttons in the status bar. It's all tiny and simple.

Like I said, Opera is clearly much more flexible than Chrome. And a big part in judging is judging from initial looks, not looks after you mess with it.


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#36 Before February 2015

JadElClemens
Member
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,559

Re: Mod conflict

I agree that maxthon seems slow, but the reason for this is the way it loads pages - it won't often give you the incomplete page, it waits until it has all of the page (or a substantial amount) before rendering it. You may or may not like it, but it's no slower than any other browser.


4RNmJ.png

I hate tall signatures.

Offline

#37 Before February 2015

Jaybm
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Chrome is fast, but doesn't work very well on my mac book pro. It has typing problems or something, and makes my laptop get really hot when having more than one tab open. Like right now its so hot its burning my leg, wait... why am i on chrome? *switches to safari*

I've never used maxthon before. Opera is nice, i guess. It works well, never had any problems with it really.

#38 Before February 2015

supadorf24
Member
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 2,675

Re: Mod conflict

I use a MacBook Pro and Chrome. No problems here.

Offline

#39 Before February 2015

Jaybm
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Supadorf24 wrote:

I use a MacBook Pro and Chrome. No problems here.

Maybe its just my computer or something. Its kinda old. Plus i have not updated it in like a year.

It's   mainly a keyboard problem while using chrome. I will type something like: ?Hello?. Then it comes up on the screen as: ?Hlo?. It lag types or something. Its weird because I dont have this problem on safari, just on chrome. Im going to try updating it tomorrow and see if that works.   Any idea on how to fix it?

Oops im getting off-topic.

Last edited by Jaybm (Feb 15 2012 9:14:50 pm)

#40 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

TakoMan02 wrote:
Different55 wrote:

Tako: In none of those tests has Opera been tweaked. Chrome doesn't even have the ability to be easily tweaked. And if you want UI simplicity you can remove/reorganize buttons until they fit your taste. I took out the address bar and moved it to the status bar along with the rest of the buttons I use. I moved the red Opera button, too. They all shrunk themselves, but they're all still completely usable. I have a lot more space, and I used attractive dividers to separate types of buttons in the status bar. It's all tiny and simple.

Like I said, Opera is clearly much more flexible than Chrome. And a big part in judging is judging from initial looks, not looks after you mess with it.

Question: Which would you rather have? A nearly perfect brick that is just like every other of it's kind, or an imperfect ball of clay that can be molded into whatever the perfect thing you need?

Why is judging based on out-of-the-box performance? Judging should be based on a browser's peak performance. With chrome, you're limited. The speed can never be improved. With opera, there are hundreds of settings to be tweaked to increase speed.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#41 Before February 2015

Echo!
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Different55 wrote:

Question: Which would you rather have? A nearly perfect brick that is just like every other of it's kind, or an imperfect ball of clay that can be molded into whatever the perfect thing you need?.

The brick, because I'm not good at moulding things :[

#42 Before February 2015

Ratburntro44
Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 1,383
Website

Re: Mod conflict

^Me too. When you're getting something from someone else, it should come already as good as it should be. I should not be expected to take the time to mould the clay into a better brick (which in my opinion it still doesn't become) but should instead simply use the brick (a much more efficient use of my time).

That's why I use Safari. Not to mention Opera is still a bit behind in CSS3 support.

Offline

#43 Before February 2015

xGBx-PwNzZ
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

Chrome ftw

#44 Before February 2015

Echo!
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

I want a chromthon browser, that would be good.

#45 Before February 2015

Sythe5665
Guest

Re: Mod conflict

I use firefox... i dont like opera... its to red it annoys me //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

#46 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Different55 wrote:

Question: Which would you rather have? A nearly perfect brick that is just like every other of it's kind, or an imperfect ball of clay that can be molded into whatever the perfect thing you need?

Why is judging based on out-of-the-box performance? Judging should be based on a browser's peak performance. With chrome, you're limited. The speed can never be improved. With opera, there are hundreds of settings to be tweaked to increase speed.

I think there's a certain word you're describing the 'tweaks' to be: sacrificial. I doubt there are hundred different add-ons that improve speed, only things that can be removed; however useless they may be.

Instead of stripping the crap, Chrome gives you its best while maintaining efficiency, and you can add on from there.


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#47 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

Why sacrifice? A simple tweak that works for everyone is increasing the speed is changing Max Connections Total higher than it is. It doesn't remove anything, it just speeds things up. *looks through opera:config some more* This setting would be useful, but would need a few minutes to tune it right. Same with this one. The first controls how long until the HTML starts rendering, the second is for styles.

There is no stripping of crap here.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#48 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Interesting: Opera has its defaults set at average efficiency. Why not the best efficiency?


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

#49 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Mod conflict

Because not every computer is the same, and the people using them aren't the same either. See those last two settings? The best is different between computers and preferences. I might like to watch my pages load bit by bit, but my computer can't handle redrawing that many times for some pages, so it's set to 150 instead of the default 200. My favorite vs least lag.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#50 Before February 2015

Tako
Member
From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 6,663
Website

Re: Mod conflict

Alright.

Do you deny that Chrome is faster than Opera (even with add-ons)?


Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Offline

JadElClemens1423655634305798

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1738673068.5913 - Generated in 0.095 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.65 MiB (Peak: 1.86 MiB) ]