Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Master1 wrote:- Guardians can't perma ban
- Guardians don't have access to /clearandsave
- World owner commands have been limited
- Being a guardian is not a goal in anyway shape or form
- Guardians are more like informative messengers, not police.
- From what I have seen, not a single guardian has abused their power. Having a guardian aura on is not abusing. I constantly see numerous players nagging them to turn it on.Can guardians enter the visible false world too?
Probably can as imagine if a world had nudes or something bad? Guardians would need to come and 'sort the problem'
Offline
villager wrote:Master1 wrote:- Guardians can't perma ban
- Guardians don't have access to /clearandsave
- World owner commands have been limited
- Being a guardian is not a goal in anyway shape or form
- Guardians are more like informative messengers, not police.
- From what I have seen, not a single guardian has abused their power. Having a guardian aura on is not abusing. I constantly see numerous players nagging them to turn it on.Can guardians enter the visible false world too?
Probably can as imagine if a world had nudes or something bad? Guardians would need to come and 'sort the problem'
Can you not read @abrar11?
@villager - No they can't
Not anyone's problem if it's private.
Last edited by Metatron (Sep 11 2014 8:32:19 am)
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
abrar11 wrote:villager wrote:Can guardians enter the visible false world too?
Probably can as imagine if a world had nudes or something bad? Guardians would need to come and 'sort the problem'
Can you not read @abrar11?
JaWapa wrote:@villager - No they can't
Not anyone's problem if it's private.
Actually I can read hence me replying to this comment and the other one, who knows they could be lying like they also could be about saying they can't give edit so they are 'less hated by the community' plus why would you wanna put 'Can you not read' no crap dude
Offline
Squad wrote:abrar11 wrote:Probably can as imagine if a world had nudes or something bad? Guardians would need to come and 'sort the problem'
Can you not read @abrar11?
JaWapa wrote:@villager - No they can't
Not anyone's problem if it's private.
Actually I can read hence me replying to this comment and the other one, who knows they could be lying like they also could be about saying they can't give edit so they are 'less hated by the community' plus why would you wanna put 'Can you not read' no crap dude
"Can you not read" is not used in the literal sense, it just means that you completely missed some text right in front of you.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
abrar11 wrote:Squad wrote:Can you not read @abrar11?
Not anyone's problem if it's private.
Actually I can read hence me replying to this comment and the other one, who knows they could be lying like they also could be about saying they can't give edit so they are 'less hated by the community' plus why would you wanna put 'Can you not read' no crap dude
"Can you not read" is not used in the literal sense, it just means that you completely missed some text right in front of you.
Yeah I know but it's like me saying "cut4zelda" it offends you :/
Offline
abrar get with the times. Being pointlessly rude is what all the cool kids do. Don't you wanna be cool, too?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
abrar get with the times. Being pointlessly rude is what all the cool kids do. Don't you wanna be cool, too?
Oh well ok
Offline
Jawapa is now IP banned.
Jawapa is now IP banned.
Just because he banned you?
EDIT: You said EE =/= forum.
Last edited by Creature (Sep 14 2014 3:21:33 pm)
This is a false statement.
Offline
He banned me without any warning, or proof therefore he set a precedent.
He banned me without any warning, or proof therefore he set a precedent.
Why don't just email him or MrShoe? Also, he said you got banned for spamming and hacking.
This is a false statement.
Offline
I suggets to remove forum access from all guardians. They proofed to be overzealous..
Hi.
Offline
Meredith wrote:He banned me without any warning, or proof therefore he set a precedent.
Why don't just email him or MrShoe? Also, he said you got banned for spamming and hacking.
No proof of either, Julian and Brian both knew that Atilla and I could ban people, they did not ban us.
3-4 people banned today ^.^
Offline
^ who? i need this info yo
^ who? i need this info yo
Atmas 2 days untill unban from 14/09/2014
Coolbetamember 3 days untill unban from 14/09/2014
Moonjumper not sure
Last edited by abrar11 (Sep 14 2014 4:07:06 pm)
Offline
They've started to use their powers? Although I believe I'm neutral about this whole thing, may the drama begin!
Offline
well i for one agree with all three of those bans
go go guardians
If MrShoe hasn't banned Meredith before - he can unban her now
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Creature wrote:Meredith wrote:He banned me without any warning, or proof therefore he set a precedent.
Why don't just email him or MrShoe? Also, he said you got banned for spamming and hacking.
No proof of either, Julian and Brian both knew that Atilla and I could ban people, they did not ban us.
They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
Offline
Meredith wrote:Creature wrote:Why don't just email him or MrShoe? Also, he said you got banned for spamming and hacking.
No proof of either, Julian and Brian both knew that Atilla and I could ban people, they did not ban us.
They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
Master1 wrote:Meredith wrote:No proof of either, Julian and Brian both knew that Atilla and I could ban people, they did not ban us.
They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You have crashed worlds before - that hurts.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Meredith wrote:Master1 wrote:They need proof of you guys hacking when practically everybody on EE knows that you do it?
I don't harm people with it, and I was not the person spamming at the time.
You have crashed worlds before - that hurts.
I have crashed worlds, but not in the last 3 months.
[ Started around 1730419423.8927 - Generated in 0.304 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.75 MiB (Peak: 2 MiB) ]