Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
This game was last game i played before everybody edits, you get addicted in 2-3 first days, then it become very boring and you quit, then you check back and get interested again, and keep going.
The one i most played was Goodgame Jump Jupiter, a game where you explore Jupiter's moons, i reached level 83 in this one, the game is very annoying, because you have to break things to get 1-2 jucos, and need like 500 jucos to get to next moon.
Other one was Goodgame Empire, a game where you build your own empire, you could only get exp by missions, it's very annoying, you have to wait like 1 hour to few things be done, and if your not active for a week, you account is deleted and you have to reset everything again.
Also, the other ones was bad too, all of them you must wait like 10 minutes to get +1 energy, and you must wait and wait to get things.
http://www.goodgamestudios.com/
Discuss!
This is a false statement.
Offline
Talk about self-indulgent. Studios who create free-to-play multiplayer games are guaranteed to be anything but good. It seems like they're too stupid to even think of a good alias.
Too bad the casual gamers in the crowd get suckered into all the micro-transactions. Studios such as this one won't be going away any time soon, since the whole goal of a studio is to make as much profit as possible.
Studios who create free-to-play multiplayer games are guaranteed to be anything but good
you are being a bit general, i can name some respected free to play multiplayer games
Every simulation game is boring, you must wait to do few things, it's like cookie clicker.
This is a false statement.
Offline
creature pls stop
you are talking about mobile/facebook games
simulation games are boring for a different reason
Talk about self-indulgent. Studios who create free-to-play multiplayer games are guaranteed to be anything but good. It seems like they're too stupid to even think of a good alias.
Too bad the casual gamers in the crowd get suckered into all the micro-transactions. Studios such as this one won't be going away any time soon, since the whole goal of a studio is to make as much profit as possible.
So, making money is more important than making a fun game? In order to create a fanbase, you will need to focus on the game, not all the money made off of it.
Offline
n1kf, you are way too optimistic on everything.
have you ever seen just about any mobile game? they are not good. the devolopers obviously made it for money. why do people play them? because they use brain tricks.
So, making money is more important than making a fun game? In order to create a fanbase, you will need to focus on the game, not all the money made off of it.
oh n1kf, so sheltered from the truth.
Last edited by Bimps (Aug 5 2014 11:18:15 am)
Offline
WAKE UP SHEEPLE !!!! !! ! ! !! ! ! MOBILE GAMES ARE EVIL
So, making money is more important than making a fun game? In order to create a fanbase, you will need to focus on the game, not all the money made off of it.
If so, the **** at King wouldn't ruin their reputation for further games by trademarking 'Candy' in game titles. They did such a thing in order to hog as much traffic as possible.
N1KF wrote:So, making money is more important than making a fun game? In order to create a fanbase, you will need to focus on the game, not all the money made off of it.
If so, the **** at King wouldn't ruin their reputation for further games by trademarking 'Candy' in game titles. They did such a thing in order to hog as much traffic as possible.
I freaking hate King dot freaking com, how can they freaking expect people to pay 30 freaking pounds for a freaking rubbish in freaking app purchase - which my grandma almost freaking bought.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
remember when king was good
loljk it never was
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738889677.7178 - Generated in 0.053 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.5 MiB (Peak: 1.65 MiB) ]