Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Before February 2015

treejoe4
Guest

macheivelli test

This test is based on a book called The Prince, it's about power and how to get it and keep it.
http://personality-testing.info/tests/MACH-IV.php

I got a score of 65.

It's basically a test on what you think about human nature

#2 Before February 2015

Ratburntro44
Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 1,383
Website

Re: macheivelli test

I got an 88, did I do well?

Offline

#3 Before February 2015

Buzzerbee
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,575

Re: macheivelli test

I got 62.


TdQRyz3.png
https://wiki.everybodyedits.com/images/5/5d/135_bee

Offline

#4 Before February 2015

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,658

Re: macheivelli test

63? is this good?


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#5 Before February 2015

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: macheivelli test

I got a result of 58. Which, according to the graphs is slightly below average.
Kind of interesting since I have a history of knowledge surrounding social manipulation/engineering.


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

#6 Before February 2015

treejoe4
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

Ratburntro44 wrote:

I got an 88, did I do well?

well it depends on whether you apply these rules or not, you can agree on this is how human nature works but you can steer away from applying these cynical rules.

the entire thing is based around do the ends justify the means really

for me personally, i would not agree with that high of a score

Last edited by treejoe4 (Dec 26 2014 1:56:23 am)

#7 Before February 2015

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,658

Re: macheivelli test

XxAtillaxX wrote:

Kind of interesting since I have a history of knowledge surrounding social manipulation/engineering.

You really believe in results?
Idk why I'm doing them anyway


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#8 Before February 2015

Buzzerbee
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,575

Re: macheivelli test

I'm not entirely sure what each end of the spectrum means as far as scores go, nor do I understand what my score says about my personality.


TdQRyz3.png
https://wiki.everybodyedits.com/images/5/5d/135_bee

Offline

#9 Before February 2015

Noctis
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

I got 68...

#10 Before February 2015

treejoe4
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

BuzzerBee wrote:

I'm not entirely sure what each end of the spectrum means as far as scores go, nor do I understand what my score says about my personality.

People who get a higher score would have a personality closer to that of a dictator, people who get a low score are pansies.

#11 Before February 2015

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,658

Re: macheivelli test

In that case, from my evil perspective about world I get 82.
So if you know that you must be a dictator you can easy be.


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#12 Before February 2015

rgl23
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

I got a 71.
I also remember taking this one a while ago and I think my scores were about the same, maybe a little higher now than before.

#13 Before February 2015

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,710
Website

Re: macheivelli test

58. I'm not a huge fan of personality tests in general. They tend to use words like 'all', forcing me to disagree.


:.|:;

Offline

#14 Before February 2015

tak4n
Member
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 1,883

Re: macheivelli test

I got 73. (I want to write a political line about political stuff but I decided not to)


signature3_zpsttrhtmyh.png

Offline

#15 Before February 2015

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: macheivelli test

I got 54, is it bad?


This is a false statement.

Offline

#16 Before February 2015

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: macheivelli test

"Your score was 43 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the low Machs, people who will hold out for the goodness of the world and avoid manipulation. Not the people Machiavelli would approve of."

Yeah well I never liked you, either, Machiavelli.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#17 Before February 2015

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,658

Re: macheivelli test

Creature wrote:

I got 54, is it bad?

Creature, you aren't a creature...
Isn't bad at all means that you are soft.

Last edited by The Doctor (Dec 26 2014 10:41:07 am)


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#18 Before February 2015

GKAbyss
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

I also got 54

#19 Before February 2015

Pingohits
Banned
From: aids lizard
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 7,591

Re: macheivelli test

Different55 wrote:

"Your score was 43 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the low Machs, people who will hold out for the goodness of the world and avoid manipulation. Not the people Machiavelli would approve of."

Yeah well I never liked you, either, Machiavelli.

Same, but I got a 47. I think that's good. I'm good. You are all bad. hahahahhaha


791mAP8.png

Offline

#20 Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh
Member
From: DMV
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,166
Website

Re: macheivelli test

Your score was 86 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the high Machs, people who do not belive in the goodness of the world and that because that it must be manipulated, people who Machiavelli would approve of.


32ortonedge32dh.gif

Offline

#21 Before February 2015

krubby
Member
Joined: 2015-06-23
Posts: 1,190

Re: macheivelli test

This is so ridiculously stupid. Machiavelli wrote The Prince as a parody of the selfish people in power, he did not think this was actually effective nor did he approve it.

Offline

#22 Before February 2015

treejoe4
Guest

Re: macheivelli test

krubby wrote:

This is so ridiculously stupid. Machiavelli wrote The Prince as a parody of the selfish people in power, he did not think this was actually effective nor did he approve it.

it wasnt a parody buddy

#23 Before February 2015

Ratburntro44
Member
Joined: 1970-01-01
Posts: 1,383
Website

Re: macheivelli test

Even if it was, that isn't really a reason to consider the test stupid.

Offline

#24 Before February 2015

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: macheivelli test

Ratburntro44 wrote:

Even if it was, that isn't really a reason to consider the test stupid.

oooo krubby got rekt

Offline

#25 Before February 2015

ewoke
Member
Joined: 2015-02-20
Posts: 412

Re: macheivelli test

Your score was 68 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the high Machs,


if you can read this....good for you

Offline

treejoe4 1423685967275465

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1738919859.0486 - Generated in 0.062 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.69 MiB (Peak: 1.92 MiB) ]