Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
JadElClemens wrote:Well, it seems that there's always a global mod/admin on, so there's no point in having any more. Section mods would just strengthen it all.
You mean ADDING section mods?
Don't really see the need, and like D55 said a while back you're not just "making it stronger", you're getting in the way of other mods.
Not sure HOW new mods would get in the way, but apparently they would.
Okay, it appears I need more clarification.
I'm not saying we need new mods, I'm saying if they decide to add new mods.
Srsly...
I hate tall signatures.
Offline
United we stand. Divided we fall. A few global mods beats lots of section mods. Someone can just post in the right sections and then the online mods can do nothing but ban him. With many global mods, you have to wait for every mod to leave, not just wait for a few.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
D-rock2308 wrote:TakoMan02 wrote:Chewy is very serious and strict. I rarely see him post nowadays, but overall he does a good job because of those qualities.
But there is a difference from a Dictator and a President.
Chewy is more on the Dictator side pleasing the minority.
Let's see here, EDJ, I believe, is more like the President that does for the majority.
Chewy- Bans for no reason, irrational locking threads, and I hardly see him around, aren't mods SUPPOSED to be more active? He is doing us about as much good as epicstonemasonEDJ- Gives a chance as a warning, explains why threads get locked logically.
There is a differenceCan you give me an example of how he bans for no reason, irrationally locks threads, and is inactive?
He says he can ban for no reason whatsoever, and I know firsthandedly that he banned me.
This is not what we want from mods.
Last edited by D-rock2308 (Aug 5 2011 11:58:45 am)
Well D-rock, you were banned because you had 3 warnings (1 day ban).
Just make everyone over 2500 posts who are trustworthy a mod, and you'll have 5 new ones...
Offline
Well D-rock, you were banned because you had 3 warnings (1 day ban).
This was about 10 months ago. Plus I was only banned that once.
Just make everyone over 2500 posts who are trustworthy a mod, and you'll have 5 new ones...
Meh, some people are crazy when they have over 2500 posts still.
Meh, I dont Need knew mods. I think were fine. AND STOP SPAMMING PEOPLE!
*Points to my last post*
Offline
Just make everyone over 2500 posts who are trustworthy a mod, and you'll have 5 new ones...
You think that we have spam problems as it is? If some new person comes here they'll be like "OMFBBQ 2500 POSTS AND IMMA MOD?! SPAM POWERS ACTIVATE!!"
Also: your post count means nothing.
Last edited by Tako (Aug 6 2011 5:51:14 pm)
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
He says he can ban for no reason whatsoever, and I know firsthandedly that he banned me.
This is not what we want from mods.
Yes, he can, and everyone else can. The fact he CAN does not mean that it HAPPENED that way. Chewy did not ban you for no reason at all.
Seems like you're just opinionated off hate.
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
Chewy may not post much, but it doesn't mean that he does not look around to perform his job. In some ways, he's just a lurker, but bans people if necessary and helps with needed tasks. I only wish that he would give more reasoning as to why he does these certain things. :/
Offline
Gamer1120 wrote:Just make everyone over 2500 posts who are trustworthy a mod, and you'll have 5 new ones...
You think that we have spam problems as it is? If some new person comes here they'll be like "OMFBBQ 2500 POSTS AND IMMA MOD?! SPAM POWERS ACTIVATE!!"
Also: your post count means nothing.
Offline
But what does post count have to do with being mod-worthy at all? Nothing. Posting a lot doesn't make you responsible.
Offline
Well, it means that you've been here a while. And it means you're active.
But you can still be a complete idiot, so it's not a reliable source.
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1738658383.1832 - Generated in 0.117 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.57 MiB (Peak: 1.75 MiB) ]