Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
You're fine Jad. Just remember the *reason* behind the rule, and not the rule itself.
There will always be haters. I got two plus reps for closing a spam thread once, and then a minus rep as well for the same thread. Haters gunna hate.
As long as you remember why you are here (to help the community) then you're fine.
Offline
Here's my opinion and feedback on you, but it's mostly about you and KanibalFrost.
All KanibalFrost did is make his signature a few pixels too big, and did you ever warn him? You just did a month ban just for that without any warnings, and I think you should really warn people in their signatures or via PM, instead of warning them for a few pixels over on an accident and possibly even before they check.
Anyway, I'm fine since I always check my signature size if it has pictures in it.
(Any time warning is italicized, I'm talking about the forum warnings.)
Offline
I think we'd function fine without a specific number, and only hand out warnings when you've put up an obnoxious signature 7 times in a row. For example, if a mod edits an image out of your signature, and you put it back...
You're begging us to warn you.
I admire whoever's consistency with obeying the rules, but being a practical judge should outweigh what the rules say.
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
What Jad did to KF was a little harsh, I mean all he ever did to me was change an image to a link in my sig. And that was fine, warning&ban free.
[ Started around 1738608815.7062 - Generated in 0.039 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.4 MiB (Peak: 1.5 MiB) ]