Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
abrar11 wrote:anch159 wrote:Guardians probably wouldn't do that... right?
They are people none of the staff know irl if they do nothing would happen but they loose there rank so probably alot of people will
alot of people will?That's comforting.At least Ik now that guardians is 100% BAD.Anyone who thinks ee needs guardians should just quit.I don't care if I offended anyone.
Haha yeah alot of people probs are quiting if ee gets guardians
Offline
And I don't blame them.Its STUPID to get guardians , its becoming like a minecraft forum.
Offline
And I don't blame them.Its STUPID to get guardians , its becoming like a minecraft forum.
Wow, that's bad...
Haha yeah alot of people probs are quiting if ee gets guardians
Why? I think the smart people would just avoid them... The people who are so smart would annoy them and get banned.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
Advantages of having guardians:
-Less flaming.
-Less inappropriate worlds.
-Less spambots.
Disvantages of having guardians:
-Possibly unfair ban.
-Modifying level.
-Less fun.
This is a false statement.
Offline
-Less fun.
Please elaborate. How is it less fun?
Offline
Creature wrote:-Less fun.
Please elaborate. How is it less fun?
Because of the other two reasons, I'm assuming.
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
Creature wrote:-Less fun.
Please elaborate. How is it less fun?
You just send them an email and get guardian? most likely
Offline
Why is it an issue to have guardians? Several of you are acting like the only thing they are going to do is troll the world and cause problems... Most of you don't have a problem with Atilla and Meredith, and guess what, they can do almost the same thing as guardians. There's no need to fret over who's going to become a guardian, if they screw up, they will know about it and so will Brian. You just need to chill...
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
unfair bans won't happen, if they do, they will be reversed.
why is this conversation still happening?!
unfair bans won't happen, if they do, they will be reversed.
why is this conversation still happening?!
who will reverse them? MrShoe? ._. my point still stands.
Offline
yes
that is correct
the moderators WILL reverse unfair bans
yes
that is correct
the moderators WILL reverse unfair bans
You think MrShoe will reverse bans while basking on the beach?
Offline
@abrar
you should probably close
@quitters if guardian is implemented
eh you probably quit before because of lack of updates or one you hated
@blizzard
is MrShoe the only mod
i assume guardians can revoke each others' bans as well
dogeman: OH GOD THIS IS WORSER THAN A MASH POTATO
Offline
Fdoou wrote:yes
that is correct
the moderators WILL reverse unfair bans
You think MrShoe will reverse bans while basking on the beach?
Lel that is so true
yes
that is correct
the moderators WILL reverse unfair bans
Moderators don't have access to unban or there isn't a command for it so brian or benjaminsen whoever has access to the playerio thing would have to unban them all manually
Offline
is MrShoe the only mod
i assume guardians can revoke each others' bans as well
First , look at abrar11's post ^^^^
Second , if guardians can unban , then the guardians may play with a player's ban and unban.
Prtend master1 and kingoftheozone were guardians , this is an EXAMPLE.
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1: NO! keep him banned! He was spamming
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone: He did nothing wrong!
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
etc.
Offline
>kingoftheozone has banned master1
dogeman: OH GOD THIS IS WORSER THAN A MASH POTATO
Offline
Fdoou wrote:yes
that is correct
the moderators WILL reverse unfair bans
You think MrShoe will reverse bans while basking on the beach?
Um, MrShoe is not the only one working on EE. Brian does as well. I do not expect MrShoe to go far into this, however I do see Brian keeping people in line.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
>kingoftheozone has banned master1
>GKABYSSFLORIDA has banned SMITTYW
Fradeshan wrote:is MrShoe the only mod
i assume guardians can revoke each others' bans as wellFirst , look at abrar11's post ^^^^
Second , if guardians can unban , then the guardians may play with a player's ban and unban.
Prtend master1 and kingoftheozone were guardians , this is an EXAMPLE.
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1: NO! keep him banned! He was spamming
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone: He did nothing wrong!
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
kingoftheozone has unbanned example101
master1 has banned example101
etc.
Blizzard101 has good points but I don't think guardians should be able to unban because mods/admins cant unban (I think) and guardians can that doesn't seem right
Also I think people could probably get peer pressured into banning someone like if they dont like someone
example: example2 ban NVD
example2: Why?
example: Because hes the owner of ee2 and he doesn't deserve to be on everybodyedits, he has his own game
example2: That doesn't mean I will ban him
example: If you don't I won't be your friend you never even listen to me
(fall out or ban)
Last edited by abrar11 (Jul 26 2014 1:04:22 pm)
Offline
blizard
you do know that it will be a decision that all the guardians make together right
the guardians in that situation were immature
try using MATURE ones if you want to prove something wrong
they would decide together if there is discrepancies, base decision off of the ee terms and conditions, and if they fail to do that, they will
im going to make this bold, since you think it's impossible that this could happen
lose guardian privileges
Last edited by Fdoou (Jul 26 2014 12:57:37 pm)
You make it seem like I don't think good guardians could be appointed.I just know they are gonna be broken in disagreement.Not everyone has the same opinion.Look , if you and me were nominated , do you think we would agree on everything? Absolutely not.Unless they appoint guys that are all CLOSE friends that aren't biased , then it will work , other than that , nope.Plus they will be like hunting dogs without a leash.The hunters themselves fell asleep, the dogs may run away...
@abrar11 a super good point you just made
Offline
abrar11 wrote:anch159 wrote:Guardians probably wouldn't do that... right?
They are people none of the staff know irl if they do nothing would happen but they loose there rank so probably alot of people will
alot of people will?That's comforting.At least Ik now that guardians is 100% BAD.Anyone who thinks ee needs guardians should just quit.I don't care if I offended anyone.
@ blizz then why are you voting on guardians?
Last edited by ewoke (Jul 26 2014 3:50:46 pm)
if you can read this....good for you
Offline
@ blizz then why are you voting on guardians?
because if guardians are implemented , I still wanna have a say in who they are,regardless how much I hate the idea.
Offline
Creature wrote:-Less fun.
Please elaborate. How is it less fun?
It wouldn't be annoying your friends or enemies get power and your not?
This is a false statement.
Offline
anch159 wrote:Creature wrote:-Less fun.
Please elaborate. How is it less fun?
It wouldn't be annoying your friends or enemies get power and your not?
>peer pressure them to do wat you want
Offline
[ Started around 1732521943.2974 - Generated in 0.279 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.77 MiB (Peak: 2.02 MiB) ]