Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

Anch · Before February 2015

Yay! I can't wait to try it out!
Ok: So I'm confused. ID*: means the world id? and AuthKey: Means like the code for others to put in? Or your username?
I tried doing the world id as PWjzxVV605bkI and the authkey as anch159 and it said: Results: 0.

Last edited by anch159 (Mar 9 2014 12:52:36 pm)

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

Yeah I need to post corrected instructions.

I will do an update of the opening post after I finish.

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

Version 1.0 out.

capasha · Before February 2015

I took in a bot in a random world and asked the owner to verify the bot. He did it and now have I control over his world, he get so mad when i loadlevel his world. Maybe there should be better control of the bot?

Buzzerbee · Before February 2015

doh wrote:

I took in a bot in a random world and asked the owner to verify the bot. He did it and now have I control over his world, he get so mad when i loadlevel his world. Maybe there should be better control of the bot?

I did this too. He was so upset, I felt really bad afterward. There definitely needs to be a better way to let owner know what happens when they verify.

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

Would adding warnings help ?

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

Meredith wrote:

Would adding warnings help ?

Force the person to join a particular world, that has warnings in text.

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

Took this away from the public eye while it still can be exploited.

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

XxAtillaxX wrote:

Took this away from the public eye while it still can be exploited.

I just snipped it, what did u do?

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

Meredith wrote:

Oh lol missed that xD

I suggest keeping it private until you fix the issues at hand. Namely, asking world owners to verify for you.

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

Fixed auth system to be more secure now.

Anch · Before February 2015

Wait. There are only 2 text boxes in the "Verify World" tab. But there are 3 descriptions. (World ID, key to give to people, and people to give it to. Or is it just World ID and the key? Well I'll test it out now with mai alt.)

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

anch159 wrote:

Wait. There are only 2 text boxes in the "Verify World" tab. But there are 3 descriptions. (World ID, key to give to people, and people to give it to. Or is it just World ID and the key? Well I'll test it out now with mai alt.)

Enter the world is and authkey, press verify follow instructions in world. This will set the authkey and verify your world.

Anch · Before February 2015

Man. I sure am having fun with this bot.... (I'm not abusing it)

Zumza · Before February 2015

Ok. My remarks:
1. It sounds more complicate that it is.(make a clear text)
2. The web page doesn't looks good. It should accentuate the connection link.
3. The security: I am not really feel safe...(no encrypted information/https).
4. Good job, the idea is good!

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

The Doctor wrote:

Ok. My remarks:
1. It sounds more complicate that it is.(make a clear text)
2. The web page doesn't looks good. It should accentuate the connection link.
3. The security: I am not really feel safe...(no encrypted information/https).
4. Good job, the idea is good!

The website is design is basic, I worked on the features rather then the gui. The site does use ssl.

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

It still isn't secured it seems, this is causing people worries and it's being abused. Get rid of it.
If people want to have control over their worlds while they're away, they can run a bot for themselves.
This is a huge risk to every world on EE and it should be kept private.
EDIT: I banned moot to destroy it completely. I didn't want to do this, but you leave me no other choice.
Halt the project or I'm having the exploit patched.

Last edited by XxAtillaxX (Mar 11 2014 10:51:53 am)

Zumza · Before February 2015

XxAtillaxX wrote:

It still isn't secured it seems, this is causing people worries and it's being abused. Get rid of it.
If people want to have control over their worlds while they're away, they can run a bot for themselves.
This is a huge risk to every world on EE and it should be kept private.
EDIT: I banned moot to destroy it completely. I didn't want to do this, but you leave me no other choice.
Halt the project or I'm having the exploit patched.

Now the bad is done. People know that is possible to edit a world without be the owner, it will take a short time to create another bot, and for bad reason.
I don't belive that the close of this bot will make some changes. I sugesst to keep it because the pourpouse is not bad at all.

Last edited by The Doctor (Mar 11 2014 10:59:18 am)

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

The Doctor wrote:

Now the bad is done. People know that is possible to edit a world without be the owner, it will take a short time to create another bot, and for bad reason.
I don't belive that the close of this bot will make some changes. I sugesst to keep it because the pourpouse is not bad at all.

Nobody else knows how to do the exploit, and nobody ever will.

Zumza · Before February 2015

Now you are mistaking. More people now know.

Last edited by The Doctor (Mar 11 2014 1:08:33 pm)

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

The Doctor wrote:

Now you are mistaking. The reality is that is more people now how know.

No, you don't know how it works, nor does anyone outside of my trust.
And even if you figured out how it worked, you still would not be able to emulate me.

Zumza · Before February 2015

XxAtillaxX wrote:

you still would not be able to emulate me.

That's true. No one can do that! But is always a middle way.

Edit:
So you deleted all your work for that? Atilla the Hun is retire?

Last edited by The Doctor (Mar 11 2014 1:43:42 pm)

Anch · Before February 2015

Aw man The bot is down. And your site is telling me to go away? :'(

XxAtillaxX · Before February 2015

The Doctor wrote:

XxAtillaxX wrote:
you still would not be able to emulate me.
That's true. No one can do that! But is always a middle way.
Edit:
So you deleted all your work for that? Atilla the Hun is retire?

Essentially. Security is more meaningful in my opinion, than feasibility.

Cyclone or Meredith · Before February 2015

anch159 wrote:

Aw man The bot is down. And your site is telling me to go away? :'(

Taking it down for now, will be updated so that it includes your login credentials. Will still work in same way except you have to login once.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#26 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#27 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#28 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#29 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#30 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#31 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#32 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#33 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#34 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#35 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#36 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#37 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#38 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#39 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#40 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#41 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#42 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#43 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#44 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#45 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#46 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#47 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#48 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#49 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

#50 Before February 2015

Re: Yay for new web based bots. (Crew Code System) NONFUNCTIONAL

Board footer