Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
BillyP wrote:http://i.imgur.com/DbaQW.png
Pretty late, but this looks amazing - get Chris to update the max. width asap!Pretty good wings BillyP!
*Facepalm*
I think you should read other posts. That's the what the original Angel smiley looked like, it's by RPGMaster2000.
All look good but the angel just doesnt look right.
Sorry for the comment on the angel (just my oppinion)
Last edited by xGBx-PwNzZ (Jul 26 2011 7:33:38 am)
the wing of the are cool
Last edited by SWL (Jul 26 2011 7:38:23 am)
Ah, something went wrong when saving it. Here we go: http://i.imgur.com/gxJCl.png
I tink the top part is too wide. 1st it was too thin, now it's wide.
My suggestion is in my album of polished smileys.
I put the fake big spender there because I kinda miss him
Last edited by Stubby (Jul 26 2011 4:38:39 pm)
Offline
RPGMaster2000 wrote:Ah, something went wrong when saving it. Here we go: http://i.imgur.com/gxJCl.png
I tink the top part is too wide. 1st it was too thin, now it's wide.
My suggestion is in my album of polished smileys.
http://i.imgur.com/8T4W4.png
I put the fake big spender there because I kinda miss him
I also made some a while ago.
and if that doesn't work. http://www.flickr.com/photos/62424593@N … otostream/
Offline
I don't know when the last time someone looked so closely at the shading of a smiley and actually cared was, but I do like them.
I don't know when the last time someone looked so closely at the shading of a smiley and actually cared was, but I do like them.
If you did do that, then you'd notice the angel is a bit brighter.
[ Started around 1732735376.5709 - Generated in 0.054 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.49 MiB (Peak: 1.62 MiB) ]