Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Before February 2015

supadorf24
Member
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 2,675

Chat Censorship Wouldn't Work

As much as I would really like it to, censoring chat just wouldn't work. Take the swear c**k for example. I could just write k**k instead.

Offline

#2 Before February 2015

BillyP
Guest

Re: Chat Censorship Wouldn't Work

Yeah, Chris needs to update the chat filter in the near future.

#3 Before February 2015

JadElClemens
Member
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,559

Re: Chat Censorship Wouldn't Work

That's why we need to be able to submit possible words and have Chris look over them


4RNmJ.png

I hate tall signatures.

Offline

#4 Before February 2015

Greenzoid2
Guest

Re: Chat Censorship Wouldn't Work

thats what filters do, actually. You have it detect profane words and variations of those words, so someone can't spell it differently and have it come out.

#5 Before February 2015

werslty
Guest

Re: Chat Censorship Wouldn't Work

censoring part of a word wouldn't work in the first place, for example, like you said : c**k, people still know what that says, and they can read it, what would need to happen, would for it to say ****, theres multiple 4 letter swears, so u couldnt just guess it like that

supadorf241423727761233671

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1714634419.1666 - Generated in 0.020 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.35 MiB (Peak: 1.44 MiB) ]