Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Welcome to ... GG's System!
Level Picture:
Beta Link: http://beta.everybodyedits.com/games/PWK0UChFtUa0I
Non-Beta Link: http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWK0UChFtUa0I
Play my level if you have some time left and rate it here if you do.
Average Rating: 8.9/10
Take a picture of yourself with all the coins, rate and post here.
Also, post a short writing about the level, example:
Your level was good'n fun.
Cheese
Last edited by GamingGuy (Jul 13 2011 2:05:56 pm)
Could we get a link?
Something reminds me of EEDD
Offline
Something reminds me of EEDD
O really?
Even though I got stuck on the first minigame, it was pretty easy. And fun. I'd say 9.9/10
Loved the minis, sooo 9/10
Ok. That's it. I ragequit on the last one. Those are truly hard and very hard to finish. You'd be pro if you won this map.
9.8/10
Offline
You'd be pro if you won this map.
Im not a pro and I won
Rage. 8/10
Last edited by Thy Cowman (Jul 11 2011 6:50:10 pm)
Rage. 8/10
I just lolled at TOASTERATTACK22
Last edited by GamingGuy (Jul 11 2011 7:06:40 pm)
I won't rate you because I didn't finish the level, but I do have some feedback.
First one: great. Almost kind of like an illusion since at first it seems like you're supposed to . . . well, I won't give it away.
Second one: bad. Was a good idea, but the same challenge repeated over and over, including suicide coins just to force more repeats.
Third one: meh. I didn't like how little room for error there was, especially how the concept of the first jump was based on pixel-perfect timing instead of something more original.
Overall I liked it and am looking forward to more levels by you.
Last edited by Supadorf24 (Jul 11 2011 7:12:56 pm)
Offline
I won't rate you because I didn't finish the level, but I do have some feedback.
First one: great. Almost kind of like an illusion since at first it seems like you're supposed to . . . well, I won't give it away.
Second one: bad. Was a good idea, but the same challenge repeated over and over, including suicide coins just to force more repeats.
Third one: meh. I didn't like how little room for error there was, especially how the concept of the first jump was based on pixel-perfect timing instead of something more original.
Overall I liked it and am looking forward to more levels by you.
I agree with Supa here. In my opinion, the first one was the best. That was a good idea that doesn't require too much skill or timing. The second one I've seen many times, but not repeated like that, however it's still annoying. Third one was just completely impossible for me with my lag. I doubt I could time it that good with an amazing connection quality, nevermind 400 ms...
Obligatory piece of text placed here forcing you to load an extra 100 bytes of data per post I make.
Offline
The first mini, I enjoyed.
The second mini, I like the concept, just hated how it was implemented
The 3rd mini. I ragequit on. Pixel perfect speed jumps are a no-no. They are ragey as hell.
The mini quality declined throughout, in my opinion.
Although I didn't finish, I am rating the map: 5/10.
Offline
hard but cool!:D
The first mini, I enjoyed.
The second mini, I like the concept, just hated how it was implemented
The 3rd mini. I ragequit on. Pixel perfect speed jumps are a no-no. They are ragey as hell.The mini quality declined throughout, in my opinion.
Although I didn't finish, I am rating the map: 5/10.
Then finish it now while it's updated, a pixel perfect jump is kind of annoying but I made it in such a way that it's fun for a while. Until you get all ragey tho . Finish the level, get all coins, take a pic and then rate.
Last edited by GamingGuy (Jul 12 2011 12:30:54 pm)
im bot
Don't spam "Bot", edit your post before you get warned. PRONTO
jesperja1, don't make those useless posts again, please read the rules. You will get one warning for spam
And Gamingguy dont minimod please
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1739200161.3298 - Generated in 0.149 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.59 MiB (Peak: 1.77 MiB) ]