Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi ive made a race level and i want to see what you guys think
Dont post stuff like "that was the worst level i ever did you are **** at making levels"
Friendly critizism would be best
http://beta.everybodyedits.com/games/PWISizVZ8BbEI
http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWISizVZ8BbEI
Last edited by St Cool (Sep 21 2011 1:47:03 pm)
It might be good if you stopped the crashing. Wall. . . ow, wall. . . ow. Also at the beginning the keys are in jump range, a key troll could auto jump, stopping your level from getting popular. Most people will leave as soon as they see the stairs too.
^wow, you seem pro already
Offline
Real code though, for a change.
I have permanently left the game and forum.
EE is an entertaining game and I enjoyed playing it...
...but it's time for me to move on.
Offline
ohhhh a new level to troll post this on the TI:1 topic
Offline
Nice level. But people don't like stuff like that these days. They like stuff with Good minis, Great art works and with a good ending.
Something that puts them to the challenge you know.
Good Luck.
Last edited by *TheRealGanig* (Sep 21 2011 6:30:19 pm)
it is meant to be the real code
Friendly critizism would be best
Now what good would that do? You'd just keep making the same level of map all over again, not improving one bit.
Last edited by FuzzySocks (Sep 22 2011 4:20:26 am)
ヽ(•‿•)ノ ❤ ♬ ✩ t u t u r u !~ ✧☁ ☂ ヽ(•‿•)ノ
Offline
by that i was trying to tell people not to try usless comments to put me down
Actually its good, but i dont like overdoing race. Humm... well, many people have already done races, stairs, and some kind of minigames, overdoing them won't make you earn something, or won't make people earn something. People like original ideas for minigames and worlds-if you aren't someone who thinks he is pro by doing 2 hooks in a raw-
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1739342866.0841 - Generated in 0.043 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.45 MiB (Peak: 1.58 MiB) ]