Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi, i wanted to know community's opinion on what should the next contest be, and to know if you prefer teaming/soloing.
I want a superhero themed competition next that is in massive/great/huge worlds. Also, I think that there should be teaming in future competitions but with no more than 5 per team. Additionally, I think that we should be getting competitions about 1 month apart that are 1 month long so they are more frequent and make the game more competitive.
Last edited by ILoveBacon (Dec 4 2014 1:30:31 pm)
Theme: Christmas
World size: Any
Team: Yes
Rating: Art, gameplay, originality and theme.
Judges: Guardians and experienced players.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Theme: Christmas
World size: Any
Team: Yes
Rating: Art, gameplay, originality and theme.
Judges: Guardians and experienced players.
Agreed, except world size should be limited to massive/great/huge worlds.
Offline
Ack, I suck at larger worlds. Too much space!
Offline
Illumination world , like MIHB's Dream or something
other is similiar to what creature said
Theme: Taxidermy
Size: bigger or equal to 100x100
Ratings: We can't specify here. Just because a level doesn't have art or doesn't have minis doesn't necessarily make it a bad level. The only thing that should be rated is if you had fun.
Judges: One from moderators, one from guardians and one from experienced players.
Offline
Ack, I suck at larger worlds. Too much space!
It adds to the challenge!
Offline
Pingohits wrote:Ack, I suck at larger worlds. Too much space!
It adds to the challenge!
Maybe it would motivate you to build more.
Offline
Master1 wrote:Pingohits wrote:Ack, I suck at larger worlds. Too much space!
It adds to the challenge!
Maybe it would motivate you to build more.
Naw.
Offline
I'd like only 2-3 team members and only wide/tall worlds.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
koto says he is planning to make a contest sometime near February. His plans so far include teams of 4, and prizes for winning and participating.
(he hasn't mentioned any of this to MrShoe yet btw, so nothing is confirmed)
(It will not be a valentines day themed contest)
Last edited by Master1 (Dec 4 2014 6:46:26 pm)
Offline
Yeah what Master1 said.
And there might be a participation smiley ;D
Offline
Ack, I suck at larger worlds. Too much space!
This is why a team of 5 is very needed.
Last edited by Creature (Dec 4 2014 6:50:54 pm)
This is a false statement.
Offline
Id probably prefer solo contests solely because I believe contests are about judging one persons abilities, not a team where there's a big chance where some people do a ton of work and others do very little, which is usually what happens, and its completely random on what side you land on, it's either you do too much or too little, plus if you're solo, you can choose when to work on it with your own free will and don't have to wait on someone else. As for a theme, I always thought an old-school contest would be fun (with an exception of some action blocks,like spikes, possibly or we could go all out and leave out action blocks like that also).
Theme: Promises for 2015 (In real life, EE or whatever)
Size: Massive, because massive worlds are always the most interesting levels imo
Ratings: Theme, originality, fun and art.
Judges: 1/2 guardians and 3/4 experienced players.
Teams: Max 3 in one team. I think that you should be able to be on your own, because I know there are some people who like to work on their own (or don't have any friends and still want to join)
Offline
koto says he is planning to make a contest sometime near February. His plans so far include teams of 4, and prizes for winning and participating.
(he hasn't mentioned any of this to MrShoe yet btw, so nothing is confirmed)
(It will not be a valentines day themed contest)
if 4 playurz in 1 tim, u und mi tugeda4eva
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732440128.1009 - Generated in 0.083 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.58 MiB (Peak: 1.77 MiB) ]