Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

mrjawapa · 2020-01-27 20:28:00

Processor wrote:

I am scum

Arent we all?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 02:46:22

I wasn't looking into the D1 lynch much, because Norboy was acting like a scum lord. If I hadn't immediately cast a vote for Peace, I would have voted for Norboy. But, now I'm wondering if it wasn't helped by the mafia.

Mutant is my number one suspect, and I believe he is Processor's teammate. On D1, Processor and Mutant dismissed my random vote, but criminalized task for his.
Mutant: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 70#p772770
Proc: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 37#p772737

Mutant called me scum, with no explanation, and when questioned about it, refused to answer:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 74#p772974

Here, I questioned a Mutant/Processor scum team:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 10#p773010
And in processor's next post, he changed his read on me to scum:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 11#p773011

When Proc was questioned about this, he wouldn't give a reason, and instead kept trying to get Task lynched. Eventually he gave this reply:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 77#p773077
Which is a complete **** reason to change his read on Mutant, and he never explained why he changed his read on me.

At the beginning of D2, Processor and Mutant tried getting Task lynched again.

Mutant called the proc wagon stupid, and started to defend him:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 04#p773204
Mutant knows damn well that processor was dancing around questions, and his explanation for his actions were ****.

I could keep going, but I feel like it's painfully obvious that mutant is scum. I was second guessing myself for a bit, thinking there's no way he would be so blatant, but holy ****. With processor flipping scum, everything mutant said in D1 and D2 is incriminating.

--

2B and Diff are also on my suspect list. I'll explain why shortly.

TaskManager, 2b55b5g

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 02:48:31

I agree with a 2B vote, but I'd like more discussion on it.

Since we're casting votes already, I'd much rather see mutant be lynched today:

!vote mutantdevle

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 03:08:02

eleizibeth wrote:

but i thought the only reason you guys were gonna lynch him was because he was defending proc

Everyone needs to go through Mutant's iso, now knowing processor is mafia.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 05:24:37

Crybaby wrote:

Mutant and Processor being on different teams of scum means Mutant would not have been able to predict scum!Processor, and even if he flipped scum, it would still look like he was just generally unaware, like how people think he is innocent for right now.

Look at mutant/procs iso.

It's more than mutant being unaware.

Mutant is absolutely scum.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 18:04:01

TaskManager wrote:

how much till the day ends?

A lot

Different55

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 19:51:56

Different55 wrote:

JaWapa seem to be trying to steer/take over the vote by voting first and burning that in. By placing their votes down so early they're essentially saying "vote with us or you lose our votes entirely."

Except, I suspect 2B of being scum... and I could have easily just followed Onjit's vote.

The reason I didnt is because I'm far more confident in mutant being scum. I suspect 2B, but I'm not 100% sold.

Different55 wrote:

Seriously though Onjit afaik isn't in the habit of it where I feel task and jawa have been way too forceful about it through the game.

Lol what?

My D1 vote was pursued as all, because why would I? I hardly contributed to discussion on task/norboy, since I was told nothing I said mattered.

I guess I pushed for proc to be lynched. But, in case you forgot, he ended up being a mafia goon.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 20:51:44

Why are people still scum/null reading task?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-29 22:45:05

Different55 wrote:

So Processor maintained that "scumread" on Task the entire game, so did Proc think Task was actually scum and was going for town cred, or did Proc think Task was town and was going for a mislynch?

Stupid question. Processor flipped scum.

It makes no sense for proc to get the other mafia team lynched. It's beneficial to keep them alive. I could buy into it if someone else started the wagon, and proc joined later on. But, that's not what happened.

Proc spearheaded the wagon on taskmanager. When proc first started targeting taskmanager, he couldn't have possibly known task was another mafia.

Minimania, 2b55b5g

mrjawapa · 2020-01-30 15:44:13

mutantdevle wrote:

He does not give any justification for this. And although he is at least forming a conclusion, this still isn't scum hunting as it's not based on anything he himself said or did.

I thought I explained this. Can't look for it because I'm on mobile.
There was a game that me, task, and norboy were scum, and those two "fought" the entire game. Can't recall which game, but it was one if the gimmicky ones.

It really through the town off. Thought they could have been doing the same thing this game.

mutantdevle wrote:

Does he think we should be taking the game seriously? Does he think **** is fine? His early actions here felt like a having-your-cake-and-eating-it-type situation.

Idk if you've noticed, but the last few games I've been jabbing at people. Mostly the people that play on a regular basis. There's a lot of **** thats not scum/town based. The D1 thing is a very good example. Everyone complains about D1 **** posting, but everyone **** posts D1. I get tired of it being used as a defense for stupid ****.

That part of my post had nothing to do with my alignment. That's just me being salty.

mutantdevle wrote:

I didn't like Task's point here and I didn't like jawapa's need to defend it. This is what put me in the mentality of associating Task and Jawapa.

Reference to the last game, where I was lynched as a vanilla townie, because I had no defense. I was told I wasn't trying hard enough to defend myself, and so I must be scum. But then, I was also trying too hard to defend myself, so I must be scum.

Again, nothing to do with my alignment. This is just stupid. I really don't know what you expect a vanilla townie to say as a defense. All they can do is share their opinions. They have no way of confirming their role.

/mobile with some salt

mrjawapa · 2020-01-30 18:23:25

mutantdevle wrote:

When he realised he was wrong about this, his reaction wasn't "huh, I need time to reread/reconsider mutant's actions" it was more "he's still scum, no exceptions".

That's not true. I did go back and read. Post for post. And that's when I built my current case against you.

mutantdevle wrote:

"cool" is not the kind of word I'd expect someone who was discontent with my answer to use. If jawapa really took issue with my response, why did he call me town immediately after? If he did take issue with it and thought I was town anyway, what made him think I was town despite it?

[Insert quote on lying about my tells - mutantdevle]

Gonna have to go back and see where certain things were said to give a response to this.

mutantdevle wrote:

Here he is majorly fence sitting. With Processor he criticises him yet doesn't give a read which gives him the option to go either way with it.

Lol I recall labeling him scum a few times.

Even if I hadn't, those are very scummy things to do. If I have to draw a picture with my reads, then I guess I will from now on.

mutantdevle wrote:

As for his statements surrounding task, I feel like it highlights what his plan was with the previous lynch. If Task had flipped scum, the association he had drawn between the two would allow him to also get norwegianboy lynched. With norboy flipping town, it allows him to back off of his scum read on Task which he had planted so that the two would be less likely to be associated with each other if either of them were to flip.

I couldn't vote for norboy or task, so idk what you're going on about.
Processor was the one driving the wagon on task.

I 100% would have voted for norboy on D1.

My earlier post talks about why I thought task could have been mafia. That point no longer stands after norboy flipped town. I have no reason to suspect task now. I've asked a couple times why people suspect him, and havent got an answer.

peace wrote:

that aresome deep long posts

Lmao

mrjawapa · 2020-01-30 18:25:59

Wow I was ninjad like 6 times

mrjawapa · 2020-01-30 18:31:20

mutantdevle wrote:

How do you know that's not what proc wanted you to think? He could be tricking you into thinking task is town.

Hi I'm not peace, but this thought has come up a few times. I mentioned this earlier, too. This would be plausible, if processor didn't try to hard to get him lynched. I'd buy into this theory if it was more subtle. Its retarded for a mafia member to bus their teammate right from the start, and put so much effort into it.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-30 20:17:03

Kirby, Bimps

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 01:33:56

▼Hidden text

Now that I'm home, I'll reply to mutants posts a little better.

mutant wrote:

So, first of all, I would like to reiterate that I did not find jawapa's initial 'wasted' vote on peace to be scummy. peace is typical lynch bait that lynches tend to default to in the early game and I felt that jawapa's vote was just preemptively taking that stance. Whilst this is something I think could have scum motivation behind it, at the time it would have been impossible to discern this from town doing the same.

Good, because there wasn't really any intent behind my vote for peace. However, it's pretty easy to tell if peace is scum by doing these policy lynches. In past games, his reaction has been very over the top when he's scum aligned.

What I don't like about this, is that you called task's "wasted" vote scummy. I see the difference between out votes; mine being for peace, and his being for norboy. But, let's be honest. That vote is not going to take off. In this case, norboy did get lynched, but that's because of other reasons. If votes immediately piled on, with no thought or explanation, it would obviously be scum driven. I imagine it would be very easy to figure out who the mafia was after that.

That's not enough to make me believe he could be mafia.

mutant wrote:

At the time that I wrote this I had 3 issues with jawapa. First of all, he had done no scum hunting whatsoever by this point in the game. His only real (serious) contribution, aside from his vote on peace which he claims was to get things started, was this post:

I'd like to direct you to this post: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 29#p772829
I was told, "you don't really have a say anymore Jawapa." From that point, until D2, why bother?

Prior to that, I suggested this: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 13#p772813
Looking back, this probably got lost in my ****-posting. I'm aware of the irony in that, but you can read my post from earlier to understand why I did what I did. Anyway, I could have swore I explained this later on. I ignored it at the time because I basically told to **** off. One or the other. Can't have both.
Like, I explained a little bit ago, there was a past game where task, norboy, and myself were mafia. Task and norboy pretended to disagree on EVERYTHING. They went back and forth most of the game. It through the town off, and despite 4/5 mafia members being found, we nearly won. Their D1 bickering in this game made me think they could be trying to do the same thing.

So, I guess I don't have a strong counter for this. I would say that task/norboy fighting didn't really contribute to scum hunting. 2B didn't contribute D1. He even admitted here: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 25#p772925. Crybaby didn't contribute at all. Onjit. Buzzerbee.

Weak point, unless we're going to hold it to everyone.

mutant wrote:

I find it hard to believe that jawapa simply missed this question as Norwegianboy posted twice in a row. The second post is where he tells jawapa he doesn't have a say as he already voted which, as you all know, jawapa replied to. So I do find it tenuous that jawapa could have missed the 3 words above it. link to posts.

I didn't miss it. I purposefully didn't answer it right away. Honestly, I thought I answered this later on; guess I didn't.

mutant wrote:

Does he think we should be taking the game seriously? Does he think **** is fine? His early actions here felt like a having-your-cake-and-eating-it-type situation.

Explained this earlier. I'm mocking others.

mutant wrote:

Finally, the third thing that I found worth investigating about jawapa was this comment of his: (https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 73#p772973)

I explained this earlier. Five other people seemingly agree with that post. Once of them is the VT we lynched. So...
Screenshot as proof of woots: http://mrjawapa.com/i/k575o73i.png

mutant wrote:

Jawapa claims that one of the reasons he finds me scummy is that I did not respond immediately to the question of why I took issues with him. But here's the thing, at the time, he did not give a **** and he accepted my response that I would explain later.
He wooted my post where I said I would explain when it was more relevant and then made this post: (https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 79#p772979)
"cool" is not the kind of word I'd expect someone who was discontent with my answer to use. If jawapa really took issue with my response, why did he call me town immediately after? If he did take issue with it and thought I was town anyway, what made him think I was town despite it?
It was only after other people started criticising me for not answering the question that jawapa started to care about it.

I'm not arguing the use of "cool", because that's stupid. Or the woot, because that's also stupid.

You're right, I didn't immediately see an issue with it. Didn't seem like a big deal at the time. It didn't feel like you were dodging the question, since you said you'd address it later on. I thought you were trying to get a reaction from me. Up until this point, nothing you had done seemed scummy.

While I was making the post calling you town, you cast a vote for norboy, not even 10 minutes after making this post.
Which looked scummy.

Eventually, Peace questioned what you we're doing; and [img=http://mrjawapa.com/i/dtz8v51d.png]five people seemed to agree with him[/img].
This wasn't what made me take issue with you not immediately answering the questions.

It was this post that did. This is where it started to look like you were dodging the question. This coupled with some other scummy posts is what made me change my read.

quote wrote:

The fact that he did not even at least reconsider his stance on me after Diff pointed this out to him is incredibly scummy. His belief that I had suddenly switched from task to norboy was the main factor behind his scum read on me. When he realised he was wrong about this, his reaction wasn't "huh, I need time to reread/reconsider mutant's actions" it was more "he's still scum, no exceptions".

I admitted that I was wrong, not sure what else I'm supposed to say. Some of your other posts were still scummy, and you still put a lot of focus on taskmanager, only to vote for norboy. In D1, you were acting very strange. I'm not alone in that assessment.

mutant wrote:

Also, what are my numerous posts that you found scummy? I'd love for you to explain why you still scum read me at this stage despite realising that all of the points that you had vocalised against me were invalid.

https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 70#p772770 - I explained this post earlier.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 86#p772786 - Back pedaling
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 23#p772823 - back pedaling your back pedaling... so forward pedaling???
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 72#p772972 - ten minutes later - https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 77#p772977 - with a bad explanation why
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 76#p772976 - this wasn't immediately scummy, but started to appear that way when you didn't want to address it, even when it became a good time to.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 56#p773056 - a lot of weak points against task. At this point it appeared to me that you and proc had a pact going against taskmanager.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 04#p773204 - "utterly stupid" is how you described the wagon against processor, and he flipped scum. Every post you made defending processor, or agreeing with him, looks very scummy. It didn't look like a townie making a mistake. It was you and proc vs. everyone else. You were unlucky.

mutant wrote:

Here, I also asked jawapa to explain why his read on me went from town to scum. He said in this post that he would respond to me later but never did. (Side note: it's ironic that jawapa avoided my question in a post where he criticises proc for avoiding a question lol).

I read it, and I intended to reply. I posted that I would answer you while I was on break. I just forgot about it.

I've already addressed why the read changed.

mutant wrote:

Despite Proc being scum, I think that Jawapa (and Task's) approach to him was also scummy.

This doesn't make one bit of sense.

mutant wrote:

[everything about proc not answering questions, and me not addressing it until everyone else did]

Actually... that's not what happened.
It was addressed by a few people, and he refused to not answer. He eventually gave us this post, and I questioned it, because he still wasn't answering the questions. This shouldn't even be a point, because he flipped scum. One of your issues with me is the way I found one of the mafia. That doesn't make sense.

mutant wrote:

and mistakenly believed that not answering questions was even a reliable scum tell.

but... it turned out to be a great scum tell. That coupled with the fact that he wouldn't stop trying to turn everyone to task made it obvious.

mutant wrote:

This is where he next mentions Task where he is defending him despite the previously asserted scum read.

I addressed this earlier, but I will again. This isn't a defense for task. This is another gripe that I have.

mutant wrote:

The purpose of this post is for jawapa to gain town credit. This post isn't scummy. Townies want town credit just as much as the scum do. But he makes a point of directing some of that town credit to TaskManager thus it is an association.

It's not a fish for town credit. It's not a fish for anything. It's me trying to prove a point that norboy was wrong.

mutant wrote:

He could have answered Processor's question as well as criticise him but chooses not to give his opinion on Task being lynched.

Think about it. If I have an issue with processor trying so hard to get task lynched... I probably don't agree with task being lynched. Again, if I have to draw you guys a picture, I will start doing so.

mutant wrote:

Defending Task again. This isn't necessarily scummy but is, at the very least, 'odd' considering Jawapa used to scum read Task and has not expressed any strong town feelings since.

It should be very obvious why we would turn to processor if task flips town. Processor put so much focus on task, and tried so hard to get a wagon started on him. I really don't know what else to say about this.

mutant wrote:

How about you look through proc's iso and look at who he's tried to implicate towards the end of the day.

Not sure what you're aiming at here.

mutant wrote:

Be quick, because very soon you're going to have to go through my iso again but this time with the knowledge that I'm town.

You flipping town doesn't make task scum.
You flipping town makes your defense for processor look really bad... and misjudged.

tl;dr:
- He has an issue with my push on proc, even though proc flipped scum.
- He's in awe that he was lynched, after acting sketchy D1 and heavily defending a mafia member.
- Mutant flipping town doesn't make task scum.

I'm placing an imaginary vote on 2B.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 05:21:22

Tbf, I've never played a game with shadow where I didn't forget they were playing.

Onjit, are you mafia?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 13:17:51

2B55B5G TNG wrote:

mrjawapa wrote:
2B and Diff are also on my suspect list. I'll explain why shortly.
Did Jawapa ever explained this

Not yet
I will today after work

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 20:03:50

TaskManager wrote:

Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads
2B:
▼Hidden text
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I guess I'll follow the game narrator.
Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know.
!vote NorwegianboyEE
I've already pointed this out before and I'm pointing it out again
As scum I played the "this guy sounds convincing so yeah im voting" card before numerous times to hop on a wagon that benefits me so I'm going to say this is scum indicative
Plus he's trying to save his face in case this turns out to be a mislynch by showing how he's unsure and simply blindly follows someone else
No desire to solve the game at all here
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 55#p772955
When Norboy confronted him, he suddenly changed his tone to a much more "joking" one
He also avoided Norboy's question that was "which one convinced you if they had different reasons?"
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
ShadowsEdge wrote:
2B is just sheeping opinions. And I don't know exactly what to make of it. In EE Forums Mafia it seems that's consistently what happens with his playstyle. But I know from playing with him in Discord Mafia that he has the ability to scumhunt and form his own reads instead of simply sheep other people's opinions.
I thought that you know the reason for this???
Well okay then I'll try scumhunting but I'll end up on sheeping again anyway
Only showing the intent to scumhunt after being asked to and instantly drawing another excuse not to do it
This isn't as much scum indicative as it could be lazy townie though since similarly I only posted some "conclusions" when mutant asked for them, back in D1 I think
Here's imo the scummiest one: He had a scum lean on Processor but eventually did a 180 and voted me instead. Bear in mind that Proc flipped scum
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I dont like how Processor literally switched the topic from him explaining his suspicions to voting TaskManager.
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
Processor sus
Not sure if not explaining his reads is his playstyle because I never look at playstyles.
And now he said his scum read on ele depends on Task’s flip? And yet again he gave no reason at all.
Why is Processor so keen on lynching TaskManager? He has been against Task on D1 and D2, yet provided no reasons for it. Weird.
Can you at least give explanations for your suspicions please.
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
Processor wrote:
mrjawapa wrote:
And when they flip town... we lynch you?
I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?
No. But your lack of explanations for your reads are.
And the glorious 180 post:
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I disagree with the double lynching.
You might say that getting rid of two suspicious players in one day is good, but that’s a no for me.
1. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, the result is either satisfying or disappointing. A scenario that both are mafia can happen, as well as 1 town 1 scum or even both town. I don’t think that both Processor are TaskManager are both mafia, so we need to be careful of our decisions. We certainly don’t want the worst scenario to happen. That’s why we should play safe and lynch one of them first, instead of both.
2. Double lynching would waste this day and possibly the next day too. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, then what’s the point of this whole discussion in Day 2? This Processor vs Task thing ultimately ends in both dying after this whole discussion? Not worth it. If we know that both got lynched, then we could’ve used this day to discuss other things. If nothing surprising happened, lynching them separately can let us to have a target for lynching in Day 3, so we don’t have to worry about who to lynch, and while we have our target for Day 3, we can discuss who to lynch on Day 4 too.
3. Lynching either one of Processor or TaskManager can let us to know information about the other person, so we can make a final decision whether to lynch or not based on the lynched person’s alignment. Lynching both of them for me is like wasting a chance to have more information about the other person.
A Task lynch would be hard to do, since all players who still didn’t vote needs to vote on Task in order to get him lynched. But I’m convinced by Proc that he’s most likely town, since he defended himself when Shadow attacked him, this just disproves the statement that Processor is avoiding questions. And Task is also fine with himself lynched, so I’m gonna place my vote on Task.
!vote TaskManager
Points 1 2 3 argue against double lynching
Then there's a subtle notice that Proc suddenly "convinced" him in his townishness because Processor invalidated the statement of him dodging the questions
Do remember that there were other reasons for lynching Proc too
That whole excuse for town reading Proc just stinks like hastily thrown together **** to me
Then he votes me, even though at the moment I had less votes than Proc (I had 3, Proc had 5), which literally brings us closer to a double lynch and contradicts his own arguments!
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
!vote Mutantdevle
hi this is a vote that was made because of the time limit
i didnt fully read day 3 yet so i'll do that soon
This vote was rushed without looking through the thread and done to avoid dying
Scum are more likely to play careful and would at all costs avoid that modkill
2B participated in both town mislynches with a careless sheeping attitude, but not in the wagon that lynched Proc
I'm fairly confident that 2B is scum and he is Proc's teammate
BuzzerBee:
▼Hidden text
Buzzer has slight townie credit from me because of the Proc wagon
BuzzerBee wrote:
Okay, when push came to shove mutant came with some good explanations and reasoning, and for that I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
TaskManager hasn't given a convincing enough defense in my opinion. Also didn't realize how little time was left, so:
!vote TaskManager
I'm not sure what defense would you find convincing, given that Mutant pushed for lynching me since D1 and both his case on me and my defense were presented early in D2
Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?
I'm not sure what to think of this since Proc flipped scum eventually
But I do find the usage of "convincing" card to be generally scummy indicative, again, based on personal experience
Other than that Buzzer shows minor signs of scumhunting, but generally the amount of contribution is abysmal
Going to mark him as slight scum lean
Peace:
▼Hidden text
I can easily bet that Peace is town, if I'm wrong then im bad at this game
Shadow:
▼Hidden text
Shadow doesn't post often but his contributions are good
The fact that he didn't care much about getting modkilled because of not voting twice earns him some town credit from me
Probably town
Onjit:
▼Hidden text
Quite a lot of **** but the contributions are good
Still he should post more
A tiny bit town lean
Ele:
▼Hidden text
The act of saving Shadow should be no basis for any town credit going for her
Her vote was a rushed attempt to avoid the vote modkill too, which is scummy and given that she rushed it, she most likely saved Shadow without realizing it
Crybaby picked her posts apart fairly well imo so you should prolly look into that
eleizibeth wrote:
personally i don't think that devle is scum for defending proc, he could be town just defending the wrong person. right now i'm okay with devle being lynched, but i'm not gonna do so myself because i'm not convinced that he's scum. i understand the reasons for voting for him (sorta) but i'm not really convinced
mutantdevle wrote:
If I had to give a definitive answer on the third person I'd say ele.
i changed my mind. this actually makes me think if he is scum then he is trying to **** frame me by "pretending to distance" himself and i'm upset now so i'm now okay with lynching him but i wanna see a vote count first and his post that he's "planning to prepare"
devle, why do u think i'm the third scum?
Playing "angry mode" to make your hop on the wagon seem legitimate
Scum lean

Crybaby:
▼Hidden text
There's too much and I'm running out of time rn because I got other **** to do so not going through 3 pages of his posts, although I probably should cause there's a lot of content
Damn
Anyway I only want to point out one most recent thing
Crybaby wrote:
Well, sorry Mutant. In good news, though, everything he said can now be trusted. He mentioned something he wished to happen the day after his death, lynch either Jawapa or Task, if either flip scum then lynch the other, if not then lynch elei, then regardless lynch the other person. I still have my suspicions on Elei even though they saved Shadow from certain death really late last night, and I suspect 2b might be alone with Processor dead. I know Mutant had me 3rd from the bottom on his sus list, so if y'all think lynching me is an okay alternative then that's okay, too, but I'm gonna start with a vote.
!vote TaskManager
Don't feel pressured by my vote, though, just vote for whoever you think is sus the most.
It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you
Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but this is the general vibe
Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends
I'm most likely going to vote 2B
Now go ahead lynch me no balls
P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts

Bruh wtf

Are you trying to make us look like a team?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 22:52:57

TaskManager wrote:

because you never confronted me,

TaskManager wrote:

because i didnt have the time

Which is it? Can't have both.

mrjawapa · 2020-01-31 23:31:11

peace wrote:

well its kidna odd how task doesnt tell anythign abotu jawap eventough some poeple have conisdered an task/jawap team

Hes setting me up to fail

mrjawapa · 2020-02-01 13:03:54

peace wrote:

+town points to jawapa for this

What are you talking about

peace wrote:

justt a friendly prodto him that he should post more

When you want to prod but not be mod killed

TaskManager

mrjawapa · 2020-02-01 18:50:27

I'm confused.

mrjawapa · 2020-02-01 19:10:26

Why task left you and I out of his reads

Why peace went 0-100 because of it

Why shadow wont Express his feelings to me

And why everyone is stuck on task being guilty

mrjawapa · 2020-02-01 19:59:43

TaskManager wrote:

mrjawapa wrote:
Why task left you and I out of his reads
i already said WHY sMHHHH
also i thought i left out more than two
i didnt really count and at the moment of writing the reads i just did as many as i could with people that i have stronger opinions about going first
you just didn't make it lol

That hurts my feelings.

TaskManager wrote:

proc no wooting posts REEE

That post has no effect on the game.

mrjawapa · 2020-02-01 22:14:05

TaskManager wrote:

i know i was being sarcastic

Scum tell

2B's post summarized: I suspect the same people as shadow, but I'm not copying. I suspect everyone else too.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#51 2020-01-27 20:28:00

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#52 2020-01-29 02:46:22

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#53 2020-01-29 02:48:31

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote mutantdevle

#54 2020-01-29 03:08:02

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#55 2020-01-29 05:24:37

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#56 2020-01-29 18:04:01

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#57 2020-01-29 19:51:56

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#58 2020-01-29 20:51:44

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#59 2020-01-29 22:45:05

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#60 2020-01-30 15:44:13

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#61 2020-01-30 18:23:25

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#62 2020-01-30 18:25:59

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#63 2020-01-30 18:31:20

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#64 2020-01-30 20:17:03

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#65 2020-01-31 01:33:56

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#66 2020-01-31 05:21:22

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#67 2020-01-31 13:17:51

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#68 2020-01-31 20:03:50

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote NorwegianboyEE

!vote TaskManager

!vote TaskManager

!vote TaskManager

#69 2020-01-31 22:52:57

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#70 2020-01-31 23:31:11

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#71 2020-02-01 13:03:54

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#72 2020-02-01 18:50:27

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#73 2020-02-01 19:10:26

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#74 2020-02-01 19:59:43

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#75 2020-02-01 22:14:05

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Board footer