Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

TaskManager · 2020-01-31 20:17:55

mrjawapa wrote:

TaskManager wrote:
Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads
2B:
▼Hidden text
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I guess I'll follow the game narrator.
Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know.
!vote NorwegianboyEE
I've already pointed this out before and I'm pointing it out again
As scum I played the "this guy sounds convincing so yeah im voting" card before numerous times to hop on a wagon that benefits me so I'm going to say this is scum indicative
Plus he's trying to save his face in case this turns out to be a mislynch by showing how he's unsure and simply blindly follows someone else
No desire to solve the game at all here
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 55#p772955
When Norboy confronted him, he suddenly changed his tone to a much more "joking" one
He also avoided Norboy's question that was "which one convinced you if they had different reasons?"
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
ShadowsEdge wrote:
2B is just sheeping opinions. And I don't know exactly what to make of it. In EE Forums Mafia it seems that's consistently what happens with his playstyle. But I know from playing with him in Discord Mafia that he has the ability to scumhunt and form his own reads instead of simply sheep other people's opinions.
I thought that you know the reason for this???
Well okay then I'll try scumhunting but I'll end up on sheeping again anyway
Only showing the intent to scumhunt after being asked to and instantly drawing another excuse not to do it
This isn't as much scum indicative as it could be lazy townie though since similarly I only posted some "conclusions" when mutant asked for them, back in D1 I think
Here's imo the scummiest one: He had a scum lean on Processor but eventually did a 180 and voted me instead. Bear in mind that Proc flipped scum
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I dont like how Processor literally switched the topic from him explaining his suspicions to voting TaskManager.
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
Processor sus
Not sure if not explaining his reads is his playstyle because I never look at playstyles.
And now he said his scum read on ele depends on Task’s flip? And yet again he gave no reason at all.
Why is Processor so keen on lynching TaskManager? He has been against Task on D1 and D2, yet provided no reasons for it. Weird.
Can you at least give explanations for your suspicions please.
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
Processor wrote:
mrjawapa wrote:
And when they flip town... we lynch you?
I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?
No. But your lack of explanations for your reads are.
And the glorious 180 post:
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I disagree with the double lynching.
You might say that getting rid of two suspicious players in one day is good, but that’s a no for me.
1. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, the result is either satisfying or disappointing. A scenario that both are mafia can happen, as well as 1 town 1 scum or even both town. I don’t think that both Processor are TaskManager are both mafia, so we need to be careful of our decisions. We certainly don’t want the worst scenario to happen. That’s why we should play safe and lynch one of them first, instead of both.
2. Double lynching would waste this day and possibly the next day too. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, then what’s the point of this whole discussion in Day 2? This Processor vs Task thing ultimately ends in both dying after this whole discussion? Not worth it. If we know that both got lynched, then we could’ve used this day to discuss other things. If nothing surprising happened, lynching them separately can let us to have a target for lynching in Day 3, so we don’t have to worry about who to lynch, and while we have our target for Day 3, we can discuss who to lynch on Day 4 too.
3. Lynching either one of Processor or TaskManager can let us to know information about the other person, so we can make a final decision whether to lynch or not based on the lynched person’s alignment. Lynching both of them for me is like wasting a chance to have more information about the other person.
A Task lynch would be hard to do, since all players who still didn’t vote needs to vote on Task in order to get him lynched. But I’m convinced by Proc that he’s most likely town, since he defended himself when Shadow attacked him, this just disproves the statement that Processor is avoiding questions. And Task is also fine with himself lynched, so I’m gonna place my vote on Task.
!vote TaskManager
Points 1 2 3 argue against double lynching
Then there's a subtle notice that Proc suddenly "convinced" him in his townishness because Processor invalidated the statement of him dodging the questions
Do remember that there were other reasons for lynching Proc too
That whole excuse for town reading Proc just stinks like hastily thrown together **** to me
Then he votes me, even though at the moment I had less votes than Proc (I had 3, Proc had 5), which literally brings us closer to a double lynch and contradicts his own arguments!
2B55B5G TNG wrote:
!vote Mutantdevle
hi this is a vote that was made because of the time limit
i didnt fully read day 3 yet so i'll do that soon
This vote was rushed without looking through the thread and done to avoid dying
Scum are more likely to play careful and would at all costs avoid that modkill
2B participated in both town mislynches with a careless sheeping attitude, but not in the wagon that lynched Proc
I'm fairly confident that 2B is scum and he is Proc's teammate
BuzzerBee:
▼Hidden text
Buzzer has slight townie credit from me because of the Proc wagon
BuzzerBee wrote:
Okay, when push came to shove mutant came with some good explanations and reasoning, and for that I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
TaskManager hasn't given a convincing enough defense in my opinion. Also didn't realize how little time was left, so:
!vote TaskManager
I'm not sure what defense would you find convincing, given that Mutant pushed for lynching me since D1 and both his case on me and my defense were presented early in D2
Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?
I'm not sure what to think of this since Proc flipped scum eventually
But I do find the usage of "convincing" card to be generally scummy indicative, again, based on personal experience
Other than that Buzzer shows minor signs of scumhunting, but generally the amount of contribution is abysmal
Going to mark him as slight scum lean
Peace:
▼Hidden text
I can easily bet that Peace is town, if I'm wrong then im bad at this game
Shadow:
▼Hidden text
Shadow doesn't post often but his contributions are good
The fact that he didn't care much about getting modkilled because of not voting twice earns him some town credit from me
Probably town
Onjit:
▼Hidden text
Quite a lot of **** but the contributions are good
Still he should post more
A tiny bit town lean
Ele:
▼Hidden text
The act of saving Shadow should be no basis for any town credit going for her
Her vote was a rushed attempt to avoid the vote modkill too, which is scummy and given that she rushed it, she most likely saved Shadow without realizing it
Crybaby picked her posts apart fairly well imo so you should prolly look into that
eleizibeth wrote:
personally i don't think that devle is scum for defending proc, he could be town just defending the wrong person. right now i'm okay with devle being lynched, but i'm not gonna do so myself because i'm not convinced that he's scum. i understand the reasons for voting for him (sorta) but i'm not really convinced
mutantdevle wrote:
If I had to give a definitive answer on the third person I'd say ele.
i changed my mind. this actually makes me think if he is scum then he is trying to **** frame me by "pretending to distance" himself and i'm upset now so i'm now okay with lynching him but i wanna see a vote count first and his post that he's "planning to prepare"
devle, why do u think i'm the third scum?
Playing "angry mode" to make your hop on the wagon seem legitimate
Scum lean

Crybaby:
▼Hidden text
There's too much and I'm running out of time rn because I got other **** to do so not going through 3 pages of his posts, although I probably should cause there's a lot of content
Damn
Anyway I only want to point out one most recent thing
Crybaby wrote:
Well, sorry Mutant. In good news, though, everything he said can now be trusted. He mentioned something he wished to happen the day after his death, lynch either Jawapa or Task, if either flip scum then lynch the other, if not then lynch elei, then regardless lynch the other person. I still have my suspicions on Elei even though they saved Shadow from certain death really late last night, and I suspect 2b might be alone with Processor dead. I know Mutant had me 3rd from the bottom on his sus list, so if y'all think lynching me is an okay alternative then that's okay, too, but I'm gonna start with a vote.
!vote TaskManager
Don't feel pressured by my vote, though, just vote for whoever you think is sus the most.
It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you
Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but this is the general vibe
Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends
I'm most likely going to vote 2B
Now go ahead lynch me no balls
P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts
Bruh wtf

Are you trying to make us look like a team?

No
Given that I never bothered reading into you much because you never confronted me, I am a little bit paranoid that you could be scum and I never noticed it

TaskManager · 2020-01-31 21:04:23

hi its drunk task again :):|:(:)
i didnt include everyone because i didnt have the time to,i included people first that i had most thoughts aboutt

BuzzerBee, ShadowsEdge, 2b55b5g

TaskManager · 2020-01-31 23:00:12

in your case both @jawp

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 12:55:03

peace wrote:

proc heavily suspected task btu he maby did iit to gain town creds so task is definetly nto town ebcause proc suspected him
he is in fact scum because he is now framign jawapa
+town points to jawapa for this

bruh

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 13:01:43

"task is not town because proc suspected him" like do you even listen to yourself because that logic legit makes me cringe
jawapa is slight town lean for me but again i didnt look into his posts thoroughly and i do have issue with that D1 response to norboys "you already voted so shut up" post

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 14:00:29

peace wrote:

could requst for a modkill but when he didn teven reachived a single prod yet that wouldn tbe fair

lmfaoooo
the point went entirely over your head

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 15:43:56

Being angry or **** doesn't justify a vote and now when I pointed it out you're again sayingg 'lynch task or i be mad' which kinda proves my point again??
This game is place for reason, not for throwing tantrums
Though being emotional about the flow of the game is not scummy itself, you could be easily a scum fence sitting during the mutant wagon until he called you out, which you deemed to be a valid reason to hop in and veiled it with simply "being upset"

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 15:57:51

eleizibeth wrote:

my suspicions against devle had nothing to do with him suspecting me

literally this post
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 13#p773513
>i dont think devle is scum
>a quote of devle suspecting ele
>"I changed my mind he tries to distance me which makes me upset now so now im okay with lynching him"
Come on! You literally SAID that you're upset enough to vote him because of that statement
Trying to spin it like he tried to distance doesn't change the fact that he voiced a suspicion against you there

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 19:38:10

mrjawapa wrote:

Why task left you and I out of his reads

i already said WHY sMHHHH
also i thought i left out more than two
i didnt really count and at the moment of writing the reads i just did as many as i could with people that i have stronger opinions about going first
you just didn't make it lol

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 19:38:41

proc no wooting posts REEE

Processor

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 20:18:03

i know i was being sarcastic

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 22:17:32

well i said im most likely going to vote 2b anyway so

!vote 2b55

mrjawapa wrote:

Scum tell

wow ok

TaskManager · 2020-02-01 22:57:18

mrjawapa wrote:

TaskManager wrote:
wow ok
Scum tell x2

can we get more??

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 15:12:11

mrjawapa wrote:

How does onjit voting for 2B make a task/onjit scum team?

Anyone that shares a wagon with me must be my scumbuddy according to peace

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 15:54:26

now thats a plot twist

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:44:14

given that 2b is probably rationally thinking and will break the tie in his favour, heres my last will: lynch 2b then crybaby/ele/diff/buzzer whichever

k thanks

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:44:41

LMFAO nevermind

so a double lynch it is
nice

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:46:00

does this end the day prematurely btw

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:46:20

Different55 wrote:

At least one of you better be scum

well who do you think it is

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:47:33

imagine if kira flips us and were both town wouldnt that be funny

2b55b5g

TaskManager · 2020-02-02 18:50:44

bruh

2b55b5g, Different55, rat, BuzzerBee, Minimania, Onjit

TaskManager · 2020-02-07 16:01:37

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

Can i post?

no
ur ded

TaskManager · 2020-02-07 16:10:58

i thought the mafia teams have mutually exclusive win conditions?
bruh

rat, mutantdevle, Different55, Onjit

TaskManager · 2020-02-07 16:16:53

i should have pushed for diff damn it
i sometimes thought he may be scum but always wrote it off as me being biased because he pushed for me all game long

TaskManager · 2020-02-07 16:34:41

Luka504 wrote:

mutantdevle wrote:
Luka504 wrote:
I blame peace for quickvoting Ele like that
Ahh yes, because we would have won the game had he not done that.
Yes, actually. The chance to lynch a mafia member still existed, and peace threw it in the trash.

it was either ele or jawapa given the stunt that jawapa tried to pull off
the town was bound to losing this game from the get go
we were always focused on one or two scapegoats, and as days passed we jumped from one scapegoat to another and didnt really explore other options

Luka504, rat

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#76 2020-01-31 20:17:55

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote NorwegianboyEE

!vote TaskManager

!vote TaskManager

!vote TaskManager

#77 2020-01-31 21:04:23

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#78 2020-01-31 23:00:12

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#79 2020-02-01 12:55:03

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#80 2020-02-01 13:01:43

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#81 2020-02-01 14:00:29

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#82 2020-02-01 15:43:56

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#83 2020-02-01 15:57:51

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#84 2020-02-01 19:38:10

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#85 2020-02-01 19:38:41

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#86 2020-02-01 20:18:03

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#87 2020-02-01 22:17:32

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote 2b55

#88 2020-02-01 22:57:18

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#89 2020-02-02 15:12:11

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#90 2020-02-02 15:54:26

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#91 2020-02-02 18:44:14

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#92 2020-02-02 18:44:41

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#93 2020-02-02 18:46:00

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#94 2020-02-02 18:46:20

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#95 2020-02-02 18:47:33

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#96 2020-02-02 18:50:44

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

bruh

#97 2020-02-07 16:01:37

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#98 2020-02-07 16:10:58

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#99 2020-02-07 16:16:53

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#100 2020-02-07 16:34:41

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Board footer