Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Offline
What actually are your reads Task?
Not sure whether I'll be able to elaborately answer this before the end of this day
I have stuff of high priority to do today and tomorrow and I might not be able to get on my laptop until tomorrow evening
Offline
TaskManager wrote:Crybaby wrote:I would suggest lynching them both
I'm all for that tbh
You're literally denying discussion time for town
Why in such a hurry?
??
A tie vote and denying discussion time are mutually exclusive, no?
You can't hit a majority early and yet tie two wagons
Offline
Offline
With Proc flipping scum Mutant is now scoring the first place on my scum list
I also have a heavy scum lean on Buzzer and slightly less on 2B
I'm open to lynching Mutant since without power roles there's no other way to clean his name than to flip his role and knowing how Mutant is even better at lying through his teeth than Proc, I don't want scum!Mutant to lie his way out of this
I understand that Proc could be simply taking advantage of Mutant helping him out to ensure that we lynch town!Mutant after Proc flips but I'm willing to take this risk
Mutant's initial reaction to the Proc wagon makes me think that they're scum buddies and *IF* they are a scum team, they were blatantly scumbuddying and expecting that the "scum would never do that" card would defend them
Yo, why the **** are we lynching proc, what's wrong with y'all?
I wanted proc to speak up just as much as the rest of y'all but you're pressuring him with votes that you can't actually take back... that is just utterly stupid.
Proc also mentioned the idea that scum buddying is just lame, which could be him setting forth the grounds for playing that card later:
In this game, it's unlikely we see any group strategy from scum and can expect each scum to think for themselves.
Keep that in mind when you're analyzing group behavior.
Also I think Mutant could likely be a member of the second scum team
When I look back to these posts:
TaskManager tell me why I should vote norwegianboy and not you.
mutantdevle wrote:TaskManager tell me why I should vote norwegianboy and not you.
You took too long to reply and I got bored.
!vote Norwegianboy
I feel like scum!Mutant could've mistakenly read me as scum from the other mafia team and the logic behind these posts was "Quick, Task, think of some cheap garbage so I can believe you and hop on Norboy's wagon" and then "He probably didn't get my message so I'll just hop on it anyway"
And then lynch me the next day expecting me to flip scum and gain some neat townie credit
Offline
For the record, scum can actually scum hunt themselves, so yes, Task could still possibly be Mafia. In any case, pay attention to anyone that might try to start a counter wagon.
Valid point, there should be no confirmed townies until we lynch the third scum, or until we lynch the second scum AND somehow prove they weren't in Proc's team
you have to take into account the fact that Mutant could just be a Townie who defended the wrong person
I do take that into account and given that mutant is pretty good at making lies too, there's no way to discover what really happened other than by flipping Mutant
Still, even then if mutant flips maf, we won't find out whether scum!mutant was Proc's teammate or they were on different mafia teams, so it could still be mutant defending proc without knowing the truth
Thus as I said I'm willing to take the risks of mislynch here given the opportunity to catch another scum. In this game any lynch is a risk anyway so yea
Not saying we should rush it btw, since there's plenty of time, perhaps other options could be explored
Offline
Offline
tbh task might be proc's partner and i am convinced that might be the case because of proc trying to not have a double lynch
why would i support the double lynch then, contrary to opinions of nearly everyone else in the game
also, why the **** are you being so aggressive toward me crybaby? what did i do to u? is it because i said i saw you as scum?
maf games are tense lmfao chill
Offline
Offline
**** very bad
debatable
the reason i was for double lynch was because it ensures that proc doesnt get away with it if a mislynch on me happens
i honestly didnt trust you guys to lynch him the next day if you were to only hang me, so i insisted on a double lynch to make things fair
especially given that mutant stepped in with so much effort to steer the lynch away from proc
mutant doesnt seem eager to say anything
but his words are not going to change my mind anyway so
how much till the day ends?
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
I've not read anyone's reasons for voting me but I'm presuming the reason mostly boils down to "he was wrong about processor so he's scum". Such a reason should be heavily scrutinised for its obvious fallacy and I think it's a line of reasoning that is inherently opportunistic in getting me lynched. Obviously, this doesn't count so much for peace since he always bases his votes and reads on face value.
"i didnt read what you guys were saying but youre obviously wrong"
I think TaskManager and jawapa are not only scum but also on the same scum team.
>OMGUS
Offline
Offline
[1] 2B TNG - Onjit
[4] Mutantdevle - mrjawapa, Taskmanager, Peace, Crybaby
[2] TaskManager - mutantdevle, Different55
i think this is right
anyway, not really going to consider any of mutant's points until i see the flip
@mutant
theres a whole bunch of people im sure i never really interacted with and jawapa is not the only one
after this whole drama is dealt with i believe buzzer/ele/2b should be looked into
possibly diff as well
Offline
If you have mentioned my town read on Processor as part of why I should be lynched then my comments are justified and it shows that I have a solid understanding of both how you work and how the game works. If you haven't, then the townie thing to do would be to point out that since I'd expect you to do that as scum you not doing it is evidence that you are town.
I'm pointing out how you're saying your point is justified even though you just skimread everything that was said
There is your blatant scumbuddying with Proc, your infamous "task give me reason to vote norboy not you" post with a "!vote norboy" 10 minutes later, and probably more that you wont know since you did not read it
And if you mean that, in response to both of you voting for me, I've suddenly decided that you're on the same team.
I mean this
I'd like to point out that it's very obvious that I've held the opinion that you 2 are scum together for quite a while.
Hm? Excuse me but I don't find it obvious. The first time you merely hint at this association is post #294:
I'm not focussing on jawapa yet because a lot of the things that he's said depends on the alignments of norwegianboy and taskmanager.
That doesn't even explicilty say "jawapa and task could be a scum team", the quote could've easily meant that we're of opposite alignments, especially given that you had initially a more townish read on Jawapa than on me, after we cast our peace/norboy votes
And your next post is when there's already a solid wagon on Proc
So yeah I think you had a retaliatory motivation behind the "task/jawapa scum team" claim
Offline
Final reads list from town to scum:
Peace
Different55
ShadowsEdge
BuzzerBee
Onjit
2B55
Ele
Crybaby
Jawapa
TaskAny reads changes that I've not explained come from me rereading various posts whilst delivering my case on jawapa and general flicks through the thread just now/within the last 3 or 4 hours. My personal recommendation would be to lynch people from the bottom of my list upwards but y'know my opinions would probably change if I was alive and you should have your own opinions and stuff.
Goodbye.
hey at least i agree with #1 on your list
looking forward to seeing your reaction once you have the spreadsheet (assuming kira shares roles with dead players)
Offline
TaskManager wrote:looking forward to seeing your reaction once you have the spreadsheet (assuming kira shares roles with dead players)
you know someting more?
yeah i know that im town in spite of being mutant's scummiest scumlord
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
I'm placing an imaginary vote on 2B.
wow these are some complex voting strats
pardon me being useless, I'll hopefully produce something once i get on my laptop tomorrow
Offline
Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads
2B:
BuzzerBee:
Peace:
Shadow:
Onjit:
Ele:
Crybaby:
Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends
I'm most likely going to vote 2B
Now go ahead lynch me no balls
P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts
Offline
I said your defense wasn't convincing on D3, not D2.
The point I was making is that my defense didn't change since early D2, so you could vote me as early as then, instead of D3, but alright the Proc part is a fair point
Offline
[ Started around 1732268438.6946 - Generated in 0.199 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.84 MiB (Peak: 2.15 MiB) ]