Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
I was already pretty sure of my decision before, I took my vote away earlier because it was being talked about. I guess if everything is resolved and nothing has changed, I'll add my vote back.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
I guess I'll just put my vote back. We need progress, not confusion. This is the vote that I was set on, and if there isn't anything to be said anymore, then I'm putting it in and I'm not going to remove it anymore.
!lynch Jawapa
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Could he have left traps in his list? Hmmmm.....
I've been looking at this post, and some things came across my mind. This post by Nonk shows a point in the night where Jawapa was at L-1. Just a few posts prior, it was very clear that he was online while at L-1, and yet he didn't hammer. Could he have been trying to increase the amount of people who voted for him to make more people seem guilty? If this is true, then I suspect that the other Mafia members didn't vote for Jawapa to stay off the radar. I'm not entirely sure if this is the case.
Onjit was one of the people who voted for me earlier on in the night, and just a few posts after Nonk's post, after I removed my vote for Jawapa, Onjit removed his vote for me. Maybe Jawapa and Onjit coordinated, and because Jawapa wasn't getting a last vote at any point, and the votes for him seemed to start to disappear, Onjit hammered on Jawapa once he was at L-1 again. With Jawapa's last post, it gives off the vibe that Jawapa is trying to pull Onjit down under with him. Maybe he was trying to convince town that Onjit was a Mafia member too, or maybe he was trying to make himself seem unbelievable, probably in an attempt to help Onjit clear his name (since he was suspicious even before last heaven phase). In any case, I'd like to hear what Onjit has to say.
I'll post an updated sus list later today.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Earlier on in the game I felt like Onjit was trying to get close to me by agreeing with everything I said, which is why I thought he was suspicious to begin with.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Mutantdevle
Processor
Norwegianboy
TaskManager
Kira
2B5BB5G TNG
Caleb101
Slabdrill
Onjit
Here's my updated sus list
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
What do I personally think of the other two? Or what do I think you think of the other two?
If the first: Read my sus lis-
wait, I forgot to put Zelda on my list, but I'd say he is Neutral in my eyes. Sory about that
If the second: I have no clue, you tell me
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
I feel town vibes from Mutant because he has forgone any desire to enter heaven strictly for the purpose of assisting the town in sniffing out the Mafia. I feel neutral towards ZdaXD because I havent seen enough about him to formulate a particular opinion about him. His posts dont really read as townie or Mafia to me.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
On a completely unrelated note, I'm enjoying the flavor of the mod notes you've been leaving. They make the game much more interesting
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
@Crybaby You just like that flavour note because it’s about crying.
okay you're not wrong
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mutant has provided fifty paragraphs of anecdotal evidence, while you just randomly vote for someone and put people as sus without giving us any real justification whatsoever.
That went so well last time we trusted Mutant, right?
Just because someone else has a bad track record doesn't mean we should just trust you with no evidence at all
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
[ Started around 1732288577.972 - Generated in 0.137 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.66 MiB (Peak: 1.9 MiB) ]