Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I don't want to "woot" posts that I think are good, that's lame. I'd prefer to mark them as "based and redpilled".
I also think there should be some sort of negative woot option (I propose "cringe and bluepilled") and perhaps some sort of post quality voting system that sorts topics and posts based on a ratio of "based and redpilled"s to "cringe and bluepilled"s which is especially weighted towards recent up- and down-woots.
I hate tall signatures.
Offline
I would also like to see an negative woot option so i can do that on your post for unironically using the terms "based and redpilled".
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Add the facebook emojis.
This is a false statement.
Offline
I would also like to see an negative woot option so i can do that on your post for unironically using the terms "based and redpilled".
kek, sounds pretty bluepilled to me.
I hate tall signatures.
Offline
I'm having the strangest deja vu.
But I'm sure it'd be fine to add negawoots (noots?), given how mature and friendly the forums have become since then.
Ayy, the rep system is still hiding, after all this time.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
I'm having the strangest deja vu.
But I'm sure it'd be fine to add negawoots (noots?), given how mature and friendly the forums have become since then.
Ayy, the rep system is still hiding, after all this time.
damn thats some good stuff
why is zoey's rep 0/0
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732432529.9445 - Generated in 0.294 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.45 MiB (Peak: 1.57 MiB) ]