Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
option to not be annonymous in those topics
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
There are certain reasons why woots shouldn’t be allowed, and I agree with Diff.
diff didnd tpost her eyet so how can you agree
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
I would say yes if anon topics were used in a way where the anonymity actually mattered. Anonymity only matters when the content is either an unpopular opinion or something that's sensitive. It's understandable why people would want to be anonymous in these cases. And it would be useful if people could use the woot button to agree with posts without having their identity be revealed or let it be known that they are active in the topic. But very very few anon topics are used like this - they're mostly **** or otherwise just for fun. Hence, I don't see why we'd need diff to go through the effort of making the woots anonymous if it has such low utility. Besides, instead of wooting a post in a sensitive topic, you should probably express agreement in an actual post if the topic is that serious.
Offline
[ Started around 1732214384.292 - Generated in 0.098 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.4 MiB (Peak: 1.5 MiB) ]