Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2018-09-19 20:06:50, last edited by realmaster42 (2018-09-25 17:40:21)

realmaster42
Formerly marcoantonimsantos
From: ̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍
Joined: 2015-02-20
Posts: 1,380
Website

[EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

Details: https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=43842

Graveyard:
   cooldude76 - Worker Smiley - Lynched Day I
   Whirl - Hazmat - Killed Night I
   RailMat - Angry Smiley - Lynched Day II

Players:
- Daneeko
- RailMat
- Slabdrill
- Zumza
- TaskManager
- Onjit
- Whirl
- MWstudios
- cooldude76
- mutantdevle
- ILikeTofuuJoe

Role List

http://i.imgur.com/bjvgH5L.png?1

Offline

#2 2018-09-21 09:55:15

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,645

Re: [EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

Although nobody commented on my lack of activity I still want to give an explanation: I'm starting uni, and I have to find myself a place, thus I don't have much time for this game at the moment. But I'll try to have at least a post per mafia day. If you followed the replacement topic this may not come as news for you.

In fact I don't fell like anyone is really active in this game but for TaskManager and MutantDevle, thus it won't come as a surprise if one of them will be dead tomorrow.

This bandwagon on cooldude76 was started by MutantDevle, taking advantage on Daneeko's assumption that the roles were given in the same order as the joining order.
MutantDevle easily gain Daneeko's support, but he specified that the order theory wasn't the reason for his choice but cooldude76's inexperience and inactivity.
Can we condemn MutantDevle for this? Not really, not now at least.

But the other lurkers voting for a lurker, without giving any side comments, that is not something I can digest easily.

Something actually particular was that no one even slightly opposed this lynch(but for TaskManager perhaps?) If cooldude76 would had been a mafia member, I would had expected at least someone try make him look innocent by now.

I will place my vote by 18 EET, in order to have the majority.


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#3 2018-09-21 16:35:29

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,645

Re: [EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

Final vote, if I counted correctly.

!vote cooldude76


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#4 2018-09-22 19:08:32

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,645

Re: [EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

!lynch mutantdevle


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#5 2018-09-22 19:16:41

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,645

Re: [EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

if ONLY hazmat dies, who is going to be carrying out the mafia kills?

Let the mafia have no kills. Who's side are you on, bro? ?


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#6 2018-09-22 21:21:35

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,645

Re: [EEMAFIA] EE Mafia Game 2 - Night II

@MutantDevle

I was merely curious how fast this bandwagon would go until a counter argument is made. It grew rapidly, as I expected.
I did pay attention to the night results. It didn't remained unnoticed that Whirl, a lurker was shot, nor that there was no mafia kill.

I'm totally not falling for things such as your games on a different forum and grasping to realmaster42's post to make you non-mafia aligned.


Railmat's vote made a L-2. Railmat's vote made a close call yesterday as well. Railmat so far hasn't contributed with anything but for his blind vote, and a list made on gut-feeling.

I'd had been more happy if you had attempted to lynch me than RailMat considering that his a very easy target in this context.

!unvote


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

realmaster421537893564725985

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1714286675.4773 - Generated in 0.034 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.45 MiB (Peak: 1.57 MiB) ]