Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
ning? its annoying if you get banned because of this thoughts?
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
This is more of a problem with the ban system than a problem with the actual warning (it does currently build up apart from if you already have enough warning points to be banned)
IIRC at some point there was some discussion about maybe waiting until at least 3 more warning points have been received until you get banned again (I guess there would be a new category for warnings which have already contributed towards a ban, so they would contribute towards the bans length but not whether or not you get one)
Offline
This is more of a problem with the ban system than a problem with the actual warning (it does currently build up apart from if you already have enough warning points to be banned)
IIRC at some point there was some discussion about maybe waiting until at least 3 more warning points have been received until you get banned again (I guess there would be a new category for warnings which have already contributed towards a ban, so they would contribute towards the bans length but not whether or not you get one)
no i eamn that this sype of rule breaking doesnt give warning points at all but adds up until it enough to coutn as spam warning
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
LukeM wrote:This is more of a problem with the ban system than a problem with the actual warning (it does currently build up apart from if you already have enough warning points to be banned)
IIRC at some point there was some discussion about maybe waiting until at least 3 more warning points have been received until you get banned again (I guess there would be a new category for warnings which have already contributed towards a ban, so they would contribute towards the bans length but not whether or not you get one)no i eamn that this sype of rule breaking doesnt give warning points at all but adds up until it enough to coutn as spam warning
That would be basically the exact same thing wouldn't it? The warning points would build up until you have enough to contribute to a ban (instead of the number of 'warnings' building up until there is enough to basically result in a ban anyway)
Offline
peace wrote:LukeM wrote:This is more of a problem with the ban system than a problem with the actual warning (it does currently build up apart from if you already have enough warning points to be banned)
IIRC at some point there was some discussion about maybe waiting until at least 3 more warning points have been received until you get banned again (I guess there would be a new category for warnings which have already contributed towards a ban, so they would contribute towards the bans length but not whether or not you get one)no i eamn that this sype of rule breaking doesnt give warning points at all but adds up until it enough to coutn as spam warning
That would be basically the exact same thing wouldn't it? The warning points would build up until you have enough to contribute to a ban (instead of the number of 'warnings' building up until there is enough to basically result in a ban anyway)
but my idea i to not give warnign points for it unitl you continue to do then give the 2 warning points for spam or offtopic warning
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
▼LukeM wrote:but my idea i to not give warnign points for it unitl you continue to do then give the 2 warning points for spam or offtopic warning
That would mean that a whole new system would need to be put in to remember who has spammed before and whether or not they should be given a warning, why not just use the current warning system and change it so that you don't get banned until they would have added up anyway? I don't see why that would be any worse than what you are suggesting... (plus it would probably be simpler)
Offline
peace wrote:▼LukeM wrote:but my idea i to not give warnign points for it unitl you continue to do then give the 2 warning points for spam or offtopic warning
That would mean that a whole new system would need to be put in to remember who has spammed before and whether or not they should be given a warning, why not just use the current warning system and change it so that you don't get banned until they would have added up anyway? I don't see why that would be any worse than what you are suggesting... (plus it would probably be simpler)
you would still rechive a warning but wiht 0 points this way forum staff that are giving you the warning can see wheter theyve done it multiply times
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
out of my 5 warnings, 4 is Spam (Minor)… So its the main reason i got banned
~meow~
Posting Goal: 2000
#Joe Griffin
Thanks HG for the signature and avatar!!!
Offline
[ Started around 1740457913.4644 - Generated in 0.086 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.5 MiB (Peak: 1.65 MiB) ]