Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-10-24 01:17:22, last edited by Schlog (2016-10-24 01:19:02)

Schlog
Banned
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,960

Pictures of Big ****

VEBj7bQ.png
mmmm i'd love to eat that ****

Offline

#2 2016-10-24 01:22:17, last edited by mrjawapa (2016-10-24 01:22:34)

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: Pictures of Big ****

I only have an average size ****:

152759a0.png


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

Wooted by:

#3 2016-10-24 01:53:48

Dencc
Formerly Thenew428
From: -50.607555, 165.972087
Joined: 2016-08-05
Posts: 591
Website

Re: Pictures of Big ****

big ducks are better tbh
33QBIU.jpg

Offline

Wooted by:

#4 2016-10-24 03:17:43

Abelysk
Guest

Re: Pictures of Big ****

Thenew428 wrote:

big ducks are better tbh
http://i.cubeupload.com/33QBIU.jpg

Wow that's a big toy u got thar m8

#5 2016-10-24 03:26:23

Bobithan
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,476

Re: Pictures of Big ****

i dont like this thread, im sorry.

1) its derivative of another joke thread so the joke isnt really that funny anymore and is just a waste of space
2) "booty" is just as offensive a word as "butt" if not less. "c*ck", however, is an explicit expletive when talking about penises. dismissing it because "omg its a word for chicken!!!" is the same as "what do you mean i cant say b*tch i clearly meant it as a female dog!!!!"

so no. moving this to the graveyard because of the title as well


aka towwl

Offline

#6 2016-10-24 03:37:08

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: Pictures of Big ****

No quit moving stuff to the graveyard I'm about to hide the graveyard from all mods holy crap


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

Different551477276628631243

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1739082489.3891 - Generated in 0.040 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.46 MiB (Peak: 1.58 MiB) ]