Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
You received a warning and you think it wasn't fair? Have a friend or yourself post here.
Here's the process:
You (or a friend) post in here, explaining why you think you didn't deserve the ban.
The mods will read your post. In order to have any chance, at least 1 mod needs to agree with you.
If a moderator agrees with you, they will create a case in our council.
All moderators will discuss and finally have a vote on your issue.
If you win, you will have your ban time lowered or removed.
Rules:
You have 14 days after the warning issue date to file a complaint.
You may not create any alt accounts to post here. (Creating multiple accounts without our permission is against the rules and will extend your ban period!)
When posting for a friend: make sure the post is no breaking any forum rules in order to avoid any unintentional warnings for yourself.
What to include in your post:
Forum username of the requester (if not yourself)
Warning reason and a link to the post
Describe why you think you didn't deserve a ban
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
Can we just pm a mod?
ProcReply: Yes you can. Posting here simply allows you to reach all mods at the same time, instead of asking every mod personally.
Offline
Why is this in Off-Topic though
moved to Forum Discussion
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
umm i think the cases of discussing warnings should be private between moderator team and the warned person, not visible to other forums
ProcEdit: if you feel uncomfortable discussing it with everyone you can still PM moderators individually. This topic is an additional method that you can use, because we lacked a centralized appeal topic.
Offline
umm i think the cases of discussing warnings should be private between moderator team and the warned person, not visible to other forums
A few questions, if you will…
Why? For privacy?
Why mention this now? We've discussed some cases publicly already. Were you unaware of the council's existence or simply not checking things?
Just curious. You could very well be a case in point that the council isn't visible enough.
Offline
umm i think the cases of discussing warnings should be private between moderator team and the warned person, not visible to other forums
Well, if it's public, it's more likely to stir up drama. How else are we going to get this forum active?
Offline
maxi123 wrote:umm i think the cases of discussing warnings should be private between moderator team and the warned person, not visible to other forums
A few questions, if you will…
Why? For privacy?
Why mention this now? We've discussed some cases publicly already. Were you unaware of the council's existence or simply not checking things?Just curious. You could very well be a case in point that the council isn't visible enough.
i mean other forumers shouldn't have any business in whether the case has to be brought up to council or not, im not talking about the case itself here
but w/e
Offline
Diff why dont you use your magic internet powers to make bans not matter on this topic. (while writing this I realized that then alts could spam this however they want)
ProcpretendingtobeDiffEdit: Yeah, that's pretty much why.
F
Offline
I got banned for ...
Ernesdo wrote:unknown.png
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▼Read the 2nd message from bottomEEANATOLY: joke
(snip)
where snip are many exclamation marks. I think this is definetly not spam when you post 40 signs.
^ hummerz5 being moderator is spam - agreed.
EDIT: Ban me, ban me! I don't care! (try to sing that)
50,000 exclamation marks would only make it more spammy, what you posted was definitely spammy. But not too spammy which is why you only got a minor warning.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
50,000 exclamation marks
Seriously? That's spam, but what I did, is spam of moderator powers!
That doesn't make any sense in English, could you rephrase?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
That doesn't make any sense in English, could you rephrase?
OKay - I'll try.... There was definetly no 50,000 exclamation marks
Different55 wrote:That doesn't make any sense in English, could you rephrase?
OKay - I'll try.... There was definetly no 50,000 exclamation marks
he didn't said you put 50,000, but if you did it would still be spam, you did not put too much exclamation marks so he gave you a smaller warning
Offline
Different55 wrote:That doesn't make any sense in English, could you rephrase?
OKay - I'll try.... There was definetly no 50,000 exclamation marks
There were 1725. Still spammy.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
From #eeforums Frogbox IRC:
Marcoantonimsantos has requested a reason for his ban, as he keeps being ip banned over and over again with no reason by koya.
PLS no hate to me, marcoantonimsantos was the one who requested this topic.
Offline
From #eeforums Frogbox IRC:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Marcoantonimsantos has requested a reason for his ban, as he keeps being ip banned over and over again with no reason by koya.
PLS no hate to me, marcoantonimsantos was the one who requested this topic.
This topic is about forum warnings/bans, not about EE bans.
Offline
N1KF wrote:From #eeforums Frogbox IRC:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Marcoantonimsantos has requested a reason for his ban, as he keeps being ip banned over and over again with no reason by koya.
PLS no hate to me, marcoantonimsantos was the one who requested this topic.
This topic is about forum warnings/bans, not about EE bans.
Well, he didn't exactly make it clear.
Offline
Exactly as you readed i got banned by buzzerbee because i said: koya keep yourself safe. Why?????? Is buzzerbee offended koya version 2.0 or something???
now tell us why did you got banned and why do you think it is unfair and who banned you
and screenshot (censoring it is allowed to evade getting a ban)
Offline
friendly reminder that this topic already exists, merging
edit: your warning properly reflects what you said. Beating around the bush like that fools no one. Look at this another way. If we weren't recognizing the "standard meaning" of kys then you created a spam topic that had nothing good to share anyway. two points either way
Offline
i just realized i got a warning for this post:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p705815
is worth the warning? i dunno what do you all think?
Miss Everybody Edits and your old friends? Check out PixelWalker.net and reconnect with the community!
[imghttps://mm.sirjosh3917.com/PW?scale=1img]
Offline
i just realized i got a warning for this post:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p705815
is worth the warning? i dunno what do you all think?
No it's not worth a warning, why would it be? It's off-topic which means you can discuss anything until it's against the forum rules.
Offline
i just realized i got a warning for this post:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p705815
is worth the warning? i dunno what do you all think?
yes lol
its an obvious ****
you can't always expect to get away with **** even with mods/admins being so lenient
Offline
i just realized i got a warning for this post:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p705815
is worth the warning? i dunno what do you all think?
Not worth warning, the admins were probably lazy to read the topic and just locked it based on it's name.
That's unfair!
Time before becoming a Member - Leaderboard
1. Whirl - 9 months
2. KirbyKareem - 8 months
3. pwnzor - 2.4 months
4. MWstudios - 2 months
5. ILikeTofuuJoe - 1.5 months Piskel is the best GIF maker I've seen
HG's signature for me - Anatoly's signature for me
The Mashed Potatoes Song - The longest post on EE forums - Play my Minesweeper
Offline
wait how come I could npot access this page wehn I was bann3d for on1 day???!!!?
Soon to be updated
Offline
[ Started around 1743688849.0589 - Generated in 0.261 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.89 MiB (Peak: 2.19 MiB) ]