Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2015-12-17 03:12:31, last edited by Zoey2070 (2015-12-17 03:25:39)

Zoey2070
Moderation Team
From: Shakuras
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,509

gun control

how bout dem gunz

NOW WITH MY OPINION!

guns are pretty good at killing people.
we should also kinda, get everyone evaluated for mental illnesses.
also, mental illness isn't even the SOLE FACTOR ppl kill ppl. ppl kill ppl for a lot of reasons. i don't feel like getting sources out right now but if anyone wants i will.

so, basically, make it harder to obtain guns.


proc's discorb UnGdm07.gif stylish themes for forums/the game UnGdm07.gif
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂   ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe   Gq8tv9Z.gif [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
? Hc0cu9u.gif         6yG4Efc.gif

Offline

Wooted by:

#2 2015-12-17 03:40:33

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,853

Re: gun control

Isn't it Australia that implemented an anti-gun measure (like extensive background checks, and banning certain extreme guns in exchange for $$$)?
Something makes me think the U.S. can't utilize such a measure, not sure why.

Apparently there's a been more shootings than days in the year (this year). Would limiting guns actually help? Would the opposite help anything? Probably not.
Sounds like a common theme is the need for more background checks. I can see this as being reasonable. People complaining about gun control should be able to stew for 24-48 hours for something like that extra to run.

Offline

#3 2015-12-17 03:41:47

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: gun control

Tranquilizer guns would be great.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#4 2015-12-17 03:42:32

Zoey2070
Moderation Team
From: Shakuras
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,509

Re: gun control

hummerz5 wrote:

Would limiting guns actually help? Would the opposite help anything? Probably not.

we have no way of knowing if gun control would help anything if no one's willing to try it out. but, we can see from several other countries that those with stricter gun control do tend to have less shootings.


proc's discorb UnGdm07.gif stylish themes for forums/the game UnGdm07.gif
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂   ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe   Gq8tv9Z.gif [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
? Hc0cu9u.gif         6yG4Efc.gif

Offline

#5 2015-12-17 03:46:07

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,853

Re: gun control

Zoey2070 wrote:
hummerz5 wrote:

Would limiting guns actually help? Would the opposite help anything? Probably not.

we have no way of knowing if gun control would help anything if no one's willing to try it out. but, we can see from several other countries that those with stricter gun control do tend to have less shootings.

Is there enough evidence to persuade the masses of gun control benefits? I mean, realistically we should look to persuade the Congressmen, since we don't have a direct democracy, but it's about the same thing.

I think the fact remains that most people I know of don't have the sorts of guns used; especially me, so there's not much difference.

The way I figure, if we're limiting the guns that can only realistically be used in combat, that's a no-brainer. Reaching into the beyond should then require persuasion. I'm not really sure where the sides lie on this issue (in the U.S., I presume)

Offline

#6 2015-12-17 03:56:22

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: gun control

hummerz5 wrote:

and banning certain extreme guns in exchange for $$$)?
Something makes me think the U.S. can't utilize such a measure, not sure why.

Because that's taking a bribes/extortion, which is illegal.  We have laws to prevent it.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#7 2015-12-17 03:57:51

hummerz5
Member
From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
Joined: 2015-08-10
Posts: 5,853

Re: gun control

JaWapa wrote:
hummerz5 wrote:

and banning certain extreme guns in exchange for $$$)?
Something makes me think the U.S. can't utilize such a measure, not sure why.

Because that's taking a bribes/extortion, which is illegal.  We have laws to prevent it.

Sorry, I didn't write  quite right. I think you turn in a bad gun and get a small sum. Is that still bribing/extorting?

Offline

#8 2015-12-17 04:07:23

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: gun control

JaWapa wrote:
hummerz5 wrote:

and banning certain extreme guns in exchange for $$$)?
Something makes me think the U.S. can't utilize such a measure, not sure why.

Because that's taking a bribes/extortion, which is illegal.  We have laws to prevent it.

It wasn't bribing, it was a "buy-back" scheme. i.e. The government basically said "these guns will be illegal after X date, you can give them to us in exchange for what you spent to buy them" (think of it as a refund i suppose) which worked because people didn't have to worry about losing any money they spent buying the weapons, and avoided breaking the law.


:.|:;

Offline

Wooted by:

#9 2015-12-17 04:26:01

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: gun control

I think the only reason someone would kill another, is self defense, mental illness, or religion/culture.
There are some very reasonable gun control laws, as well as completely pointless ones.

Firearms will always exist, the solution is to remove them from the possession of those unqualified and/or mentally ill.

I believe the solution is to have tasers and pepper spray as self defense weaponry.
Lethality needs to be seriously considered on both sides of the argument, as the basis of the pro-firearm argument is self-defense.

Before any accusations, I am neither pro-guns nor anti-guns.


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#10 2015-12-17 12:11:00

Nebula
Guest

Re: gun control

support gun
p-

#11 2015-12-17 13:05:54

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: gun control

hummerz5 wrote:

I think you turn in a bad gun and get a small sum. Is that still bribing/extorting?

Ha, no.  This is why Australia has such a huge debt.  Their debt grows faster than their rabbit population.  It's bigger than some of the spiders they have.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#12 2015-12-17 13:07:24

AmdS
Member
From: Brazil
Joined: 2015-05-27
Posts: 2,384
Website

Re: gun control

I don't like guns at all. They are good for some reasons, but I when I see "News" tv channels, I get scared to get out of my house

Offline

#13 2015-12-17 19:49:11

Anak
Guest

Re: gun control

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

#14 2015-12-17 21:07:08

blizzard
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 556

Re: gun control

Anak wrote:

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli … d-n1464528
We don't want that do we?

Offline

#15 2015-12-17 21:59:03

Insanity
Member
From: Douchebag Island
Joined: 2015-03-07
Posts: 1,123

Re: gun control

Magnum .44 master race


Maverick: Started up on a 6, when he pulled from the clouds, and then I moved in above him.
Charlie: Well, if you were directly above him, how could you see him?
Maverick: Because I was inverted.

Offline

#16 2015-12-17 22:00:56

Anak
Guest

Re: gun control

blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli … d-n1464528
We don't want that do we?

What kind of website is that
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2640817.stm
Tfw that was over a decade ago

#17 2015-12-17 22:55:41, last edited by blizzard (2015-12-17 22:55:55)

blizzard
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 556

Re: gun control

Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli … d-n1464528
We don't want that do we?

What kind of website is that
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2640817.stm
Tfw that was over a decade ago

I know. But, when it happened really doesn't matter now does it? I'd like your take on how you think this will not be a recurring event.

Offline

#18 2015-12-17 22:58:56

Muftwin
Member
Joined: 2015-02-27
Posts: 535

Re: gun control

Zoey2070 wrote:

but, we can see from several other countries that those with stricter gun control do tend to have less shootings.

and less people


hNtlhM5.png
ZOEY DOESNT ACCEPT ANYTHING

Offline

Wooted by:

#19 2015-12-17 23:06:45, last edited by blizzard (2015-12-17 23:10:51)

blizzard
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 556

Re: gun control

Zoey2070 wrote:
hummerz5 wrote:

Would limiting guns actually help? Would the opposite help anything? Probably not.

we have no way of knowing if gun control would help anything if no one's willing to try it out. but, we can see from several other countries that those with stricter gun control do tend to have less shootings.

"The U.S.’ index of 0.12 per 5,000,000 places it behind Norway, Finland, Slovakia, Israel, and Switzerland – at half the ratio.

Another thing one might note: The top 5 countries for mass shootings per capita all have “restrictive” gun policies."

Offline

#20 2015-12-17 23:57:23

Stubby
Member
From: Maryland, U.S.A.
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 1,721
Website

Re: gun control

People should be allowed to buy most kinds of guns if they want to. However, I think background checks should be mandatory, and you shouldn't be able to buy an obvious killing machine (like a high-capacity assault rifle) unless you have a specific reason to, and some sort of license.


fgRzols.png

Offline

#21 2015-12-18 00:43:20

Anak
Guest

Re: gun control

blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli … d-n1464528
We don't want that do we?

What kind of website is that
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2640817.stm
Tfw that was over a decade ago

I know. But, when it happened really doesn't matter now does it? I'd like your take on how you think this will not be a recurring event.

Well it kind of does, bc if it was ages ago then it's kind of irrelevant. And it is.
Obviously it's not a recurring event because I haven't heard of a mass shooting in a long time here on the news and I don't think it will be because we banned guns.

#22 2015-12-18 00:59:54

blizzard
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 556

Re: gun control

Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:

I don't see why they're necessary, and murders go significantly down with stricter gun laws.
I'd be more in the interest of less murders than "less rights".

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli … d-n1464528
We don't want that do we?

What kind of website is that
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2640817.stm
Tfw that was over a decade ago

I know. But, when it happened really doesn't matter now does it? I'd like your take on how you think this will not be a recurring event.

Well it kind of does, bc if it was ages ago then it's kind of irrelevant. And it is.
Obviously it's not a recurring event because I haven't heard of a mass shooting in a long time here on the news and I don't think it will be because we banned guns.

You can check this out: http://www.breitbart.com/national-secur … in-europe/
I certainly don't want this in America. Also check out the proof I gave to Zoey. Make sure to think through your answer.

Offline

#23 2015-12-18 19:34:03

Anak
Guest

Re: gun control

blizzard wrote:

long

I don't know where you're getting your info from (looks like shady sites, hit me up with something like BBC) but where I'm looking, our gun control is tight and gun related deaths are minimal. The article mentions Dunblane, Scotland, which seems to be the only school shooting that's actually happened in this country.
Seriously, I don't know what you're trying to disprove me with. Gun laws work.

#24 2015-12-19 02:18:37, last edited by blizzard (2015-12-19 02:19:07)

blizzard
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 556

Re: gun control

Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:

long

I don't know where you're getting your info from (looks like shady sites, hit me up with something like BBC) but where I'm looking, our gun control is tight and gun related deaths are minimal. The article mentions Dunblane, Scotland, which seems to be the only school shooting that's actually happened in this country.
Seriously, I don't know what you're trying to disprove me with. Gun laws work.

Understand if you don't wanna check it out. Just letting you know, I've given you proof that gun control has hurt countries/cities in a lot of cases yet you refuse to give it a second thought. Believe what you want, but I certainly will believe multiple cases over Anak's word, sorry.

Offline

#25 2015-12-19 02:26:00

Anak
Guest

Re: gun control

blizzard wrote:
Anak wrote:
blizzard wrote:

long

I don't know where you're getting your info from (looks like shady sites, hit me up with something like BBC) but where I'm looking, our gun control is tight and gun related deaths are minimal. The article mentions Dunblane, Scotland, which seems to be the only school shooting that's actually happened in this country.
Seriously, I don't know what you're trying to disprove me with. Gun laws work.

Understand if you don't wanna check it out. Just letting you know, I've given you proof that gun control has hurt countries/cities in a lot of cases yet you refuse to give it a second thought. Believe what you want, but I certainly will believe multiple cases over Anak's word, sorry.

"Multiple cases" which weren't actually what you said them to be. Gun control isn't hurting anyone, it's helping, and I've countered your proof with actual fact so I don't know what you're chatting lmao

Crastopher1450645308568840

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732221499.6715 - Generated in 0.573 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.84 MiB (Peak: 2.11 MiB) ]