Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Look what I found:
This is one of the reasons why the lobby order should not be determined by woots. Those hackers just found a way to change the number of woots in a world.
Discuss.
EDIT: These worlds showed in the picture are gone now.
Last edited by P788 (Nov 16 2012 9:02:20 am)
Yes, I saw this also.
This man who made it is BIG NOOB.
It is an obvious exploit. Too bad someone found out about it.
As much detail as I'm going to provide, the woots aren't real, but are just displayed due to creation arguments.
*u stinky*
Offline
The funny thing is that I was about to do this when it was released publicly.
A single person abusing the woot system should not mean that you have to remove the entire system. If you do not want people to do this, you must deal with the person responsible both accurately and without mercy. If someone gets away with it, or with a minor punishment, they may not respect authority. Although I guess the real problem is a lack of rules as people will complain if you ban them without warning. If a list of rules is made, and it is made clear that the list is subject to change, administrators will not have to program the game to make such acts impossible. The mere fear of being banned should prevent any and all attempts to break the rules.
Last edited by GKAbyss (Nov 16 2012 9:59:48 am)
if the founder publish this
the old way will be back.
i think thats much better
Today I saw that with all levels called WOOT WOOT
Every single level had only Guest-1 in it and in the bar it said 0 woots 0 totalwoots...
STOP THIS WOOTNESS NOW!....
This is ruining ee..
To repair damage sometimes one must make it worse off than it started, EE will be cleansed.
Looks like MrShoe patched it. No idea how they found it. But I gave out how to send woots. And I guess it's how they used it.
Offline
Worlds are still sorted by number of woots. I hate this.
Worlds are still sorted by number of woots. I hate this.
So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
Offline
deetz wrote:Worlds are still sorted by number of woots. I hate this.
So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
Then what is your solution?
doh wrote:deetz wrote:Worlds are still sorted by number of woots. I hate this.
So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
Then what is your solution?
To remove the guest counting from the worlds. And sort by users. The woot system sucks anyway.
Offline
Might aswell scrap all my levels I'm working on, not like they'll see the light of day with this Woot system.
Today I saw that with all levels called WOOT WOOT
Every single level had only Guest-1 in it and in the bar it said 0 woots 0 totalwoots...
STOP THIS WOOTNESS NOW!....
This is advancing ee towards greatness of man kind!
*Fixed
LD3H wrote:Today I saw that with all levels called WOOT WOOT
Every single level had only Guest-1 in it and in the bar it said 0 woots 0 totalwoots...
STOP THIS WOOTNESS NOW!....
This is advancing ee towards greatness of man kind!*Fixed
Are you joking? Do you really think this is a good update? REALLY?
The funny thing is that most of the noob world I was in HAS NO GUESTBOMB. I mean, come on you guys.
Why are you being so cryptic about this update? Hell, WHY DID NONE OF YOU TOOK THE GOLDEN CHANCE? I bombed Station immediately and it was on top for days, man! DAYS! In the end, only two or three pros took the golden chance to change EE! This is your fault too, don't blame it all on shoe! Instead of whining, why didn't you just bombed your level?
Besides, I never saw any of you bombed good levels, it's no wonder EE has turned the way it is.
Last edited by Aoitenshi (Nov 16 2012 6:34:46 pm)
Offline
dylan? did u die again? dill?! -,-
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
Arceus64 wrote:doh wrote:So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
Then what is your solution?
To remove the guest counting from the worlds. And sort by users. The woot system sucks anyway.
Well, this makes no difference to block guest count. EE Accounts aren't even a dime a dozen.
Offline
The woot system sucks anyway.
Agree
The next wednesday EE will be just chaos. Why?
Every nub will make lots of accounts and start wootbombing his lvl.
Wahat will the PROs do? Do the same
And what will the nubs do? Do the same
As there are about 700 nubs and 50 (or less) PROs the nubs will start make raging the PROs then, the nubs will take over EE.
So thats it.
Offline
doh wrote:The woot system sucks anyway.
Agree
The next wednesday EE will be just chaos. Why?
Every nub will make lots of accounts and start wootbombing his lvl.Wahat will the PROs do? Do the same
And what will the nubs do? Do the same
As there are about 700 nubs and 50 (or less) PROs the nubs will start make raging the PROs then, the nubs will take over EE.
So thats it.
Then EE will slowly fade away into the background with only about 400 people playing daily and MrShoe will keep making updates but not many people will be playing then so....
Arceus64 wrote:doh wrote:So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
Then what is your solution?
To remove the guest counting from the worlds. And sort by users. The woot system sucks anyway.
thats the best idea.
totally agree
deetz wrote:Worlds are still sorted by number of woots. I hate this.
So you prefer sorted by total users? Aka guestbombed noob worlds?
YES. MrShoe said in an email to squadfs that he was gonna change it so that you can filter the order the worlds are listed. Probabbly woots online and plays.
I like this way of silent protest against the recent update :-)
Whoever is exploiting the game this way - keep on doing so !
Hi.
Offline
Hmmm, strange world :
I think this will be correted.
[ Started around 1732793700.1906 - Generated in 0.075 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.71 MiB (Peak: 1.94 MiB) ]