Official Everybody Edits Forums

treejoe4

Guest

NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

http://io9.com/5962240/scientists-claim … ng-on-mars

I wonder what it is, hopefully it's a sign of life past or present. Maybe we will get world peace or something.

Arceus64

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Hopefully they're friendly.

JadElClemens

Member

From: Colorado, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,559

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Hopefully they find a possibility of some new, carbon-less form of life. That'd be cool, eh?

---

I hate tall signatures.

Zoey2070

Moderation Team

From: Shakuras

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,511

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

i guess you could say it's
( ?_?)
( ?_?)>??-?
(??_?)
mars-shaking.

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

i am sorry

either way, that's really interesting

Last edited by Zoey2070 (Nov 21 2012 11:39:25 am)

---

proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂   ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe    [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?          

Echo!

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

An ant!

Koya

Fabulous Member

From: The island with those Brits

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 6,310

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I bet it's traces from an ancient mayan astronaut who strapped rockets to a chair, and smashed into mars in that spot of mars but his remains were scattered over a vast distance after impact. That's most likely.

---

Thank you eleizibeth ^

I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them

krubby

Member

Joined: 2015-06-23

Posts: 1,190

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Just to anyone who's thinking we'll have neighbors: no. Even if there is currently life on Mars, it would be, at best, protists. BTW, I've been thinking about something off-topic, just it's not really worth its own topic. What would it look like if we got tons of bacteria and densely packed them together into a large ball. WHOOOOOOOOA MIND BLOWN!!!!

treejoe4

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Just to anyone who's thinking we'll have neighbors: no. Even if there is currently life on Mars, it would be, at best, protists. BTW, I've been thinking about something off-topic, just it's not really worth its own topic. What would it look like if we got tons of bacteria and densely packed them together into a large ball. WHOOOOOOOOA MIND BLOWN!!!!

It would just like a ball of the stuff they grow on petri dishes.

I wonder if the NASA news is something amazing for them, or them and the public. NASA have announced life from Mars twice before, and then said they were wrong. Maybe they want to not look like idiots this time.

It's probably just amino acids.

Or maybe a monolith...

Last edited by treejoe4 (Nov 21 2012 3:10:27 pm)

Tachyonic

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I can imagine an alien registering onto this site and discussing topics.

THEY'LL DESTROY US ALL!!
THEY'LL DESTROY US ALL!!
THEY'LL DESTROY US ALL!!

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

They found alien poo-poo.

---

________________________________________________________

soccerfreak006

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I think it may be absolute proof of mars originally having water.

Zoey2070

Moderation Team

From: Shakuras

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,511

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Close, SF006.

WATER ICE ON MERCURY!

so i guess it was 'mercuryshaking' as opposed to mars shaking. Wow, they weren't exaggerating when they said earthshaking, though.

Last edited by Zoey2070 (Nov 29 2012 3:46:13 pm)

---

proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂   ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe    [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?          

treejoe4

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Mercury having ice? Cool, but I want the Mars announcement. Apparently it's not as big as life as NASA said it was 'interesting'.

Echo!

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

What ever happened to the sun tornado?

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I'm not interested in Martian life as much as I am interested in Mars being a possible planet to live on. American imperialism, woo! It'stheonlythingwe'regoodat!

Of course there are temperature and other physical problems but this is definitely a good step - the atmosphere is one of the more fundamentally deal-breaking factors.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Breadfinn

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 2,063

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Just stepping in. Do you possibly think that, um, this could lead to the end, you know, in December?

---

krubby

Member

Joined: 2015-06-23

Posts: 1,190

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I'm not interested in Martian life as much as I am interested in Mars being a possible planet to live on. American imperialism, woo! It'stheonlythingwe'regoodat!

There's actually a treaty that America and a bunch of other nations signed agreeing that no celestial body besides Earth can be claimed/have parts of it claimed.

Riler

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Just stepping in. Do you possibly think that, um, this could lead to the end, you know, in December?

Lol this aint skyfall

treejoe4

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Just stepping in. Do you possibly think that, um, this could lead to the end, you know, in December?

No, no, no.

And sun tornadoes happen all the time

Last edited by treejoe4 (Nov 29 2012 5:47:35 pm)

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

I'm not interested in Martian life as much as I am interested in Mars being a possible planet to live on. American imperialism, woo! It'stheonlythingwe'regoodat!

There's actually a treaty that America and a bunch of other nations signed agreeing that no celestial body besides Earth can be claimed/have parts of it claimed.

It bothers me how there are a few hold-outs in this aforementioned agreement. It's like they feel they should be able to say "finders keepers" when it comes to planets/planetary land masses, which is innocent at a trivial level, but this is entirely different. Just because nobody has their name written on it, does that mean it is yours to take?

Maybe they're just scared of commitment. Or they want to destroy other countries on an interplanetary level. Either or.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

killingpepper123

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

What would it look like if we got tons of bacteria and densely packed them together into a large ball. WHOOOOOOOOA MIND BLOWN!!!!

They'll eat each other.

Shift

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

It bothers me how there are a few hold-outs in this aforementioned agreement. It's like they feel they should be able to say "finders keepers" when it comes to planets/planetary land masses, which is innocent at a trivial level, but this is entirely different. Just because nobody has their name written on it, does that mean it is yours to take?

I'd like to remind you of history. Every single second of it.

Because people never claimed anything before, much less that with someone's name on it.

Tachyonic

Guest

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: NASA claims to have found something “earthshaking”

It bothers me how there are a few hold-outs in this aforementioned agreement. It's like they feel they should be able to say "finders keepers" when it comes to planets/planetary land masses, which is innocent at a trivial level, but this is entirely different. Just because nobody has their name written on it, does that mean it is yours to take?

I'd like to remind you of history. Every single second of it.

Because people never claimed anything before, much less that with someone's name on it.

It's a little bit different when you have a third-world country or two breaching a contract 97% of the world has agreed to.

I'm simply questioning their motives to not signing, not pondering some imaginary scenario where we find a habitable planet and there is dispute over who owns what.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.