Official Everybody Edits Forums

Noctis

Guest

Sriracha Hot Sauce

I've eaten food with Sriracha since 2013. Today I just poured a lot of Sriracha on my rice. Wow was my rice delicious!!! One little sauce can make a huge difference! I love Sriracha! Do you love Sriracha? Share your stories with your Sriracha hot sauce adventures!

Onjit

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,710

Website

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

If you want to sound like an adbot you need to make that four times longer and a bunch of links every sentence.

---

:.|:;

Noctis

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

If you want to sound like an adbot you need to make that four times longer and a bunch of links every sentence.

Lol let's not veer this off-track!

dragonranger

Member

Joined: 2015-03-21

Posts: 1,162

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

If you want to sound like an adbot you need to make that four times longer and a bunch of links every sentence.

And state that its only $1bil
But on special. Only $999,999,999.99

---

MyAnimeList | Everybody Edits

Anch

Member

Joined: 2015-02-16

Posts: 5,447

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Mh..... my adventures of Sriracha sauce....
OK here I go:
Once upon I didn't care.
(Sorry if I sound mean there)

Last edited by anch159 (Apr 10 2014 2:18:44 pm)

Muftwin

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Does sriracha contend that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years because it fits its political agenda or because it's too ignorant of the facts to know that the claim that it has the trappings of deity is truly illusory? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how sriracha believes that its god is more caring and compassionate than your god, and to prove it, its god wants it to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good. Yeah, that makes sense. Next, sriracha will be telling us that egotism forms the core of any utopian society.

Last edited by Muftwin (Apr 10 2014 4:33:00 pm)

Noctis

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Does sriracha contend that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years because it fits its political agenda or because it's too ignorant of the facts to know that the claim that it has the trappings of deity is truly illusory? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how sriracha believes that its god is more caring and compassionate than your god, and to prove it, its god wants it to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good. Yeah, that makes sense. Next, sriracha will be telling us that egotism forms the core of any utopian society.

Correct. Impoverished compromise due of Sriracha hot sauces execute the sovereignty of deific effigies. On behalf of ittam et. al. comes an accordance of qualms with abrupt denegation of striations referencing solace and isotropic displacement of revolutionary degeneration. The preordination in salvation reimplementation can distribute amongst raise of prelature and ordained syrah. So commending a reinterred umbrage, the elliptical local sunders and mocks quickened abraise--leaving only blight in ordinance's path. Deeming no ratifying gratification, seeing Sriracha in such vastitude amongst pluvial neojectacularhibernaculum, can only suppress a deeming live shrewd farceur...

Last edited by Noctis (Apr 10 2014 6:10:02 pm)

Muftwin

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Does sriracha contend that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years because it fits its political agenda or because it's too ignorant of the facts to know that the claim that it has the trappings of deity is truly illusory? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how sriracha believes that its god is more caring and compassionate than your god, and to prove it, its god wants it to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good. Yeah, that makes sense. Next, sriracha will be telling us that egotism forms the core of any utopian society.

Correct. Impoverished compromise due of Sriracha hot sauces execute the sovereignty of deific effigies. On behalf of ittam et. al. comes an accordance of qualms with abrupt denegation of striations referencing solace and isotropic displacement of revolutionary degeneration. The preordination in salvation reimplementation can distribute amongst raise of prelature and ordained syrah. So commending a reinterred umbrage, the elliptical local sunders and mocks quickened abraise--leaving only blight in ordinance's path. Deeming no ratifying gratification, seeing Sriracha in such vastitude amongst pluvial neojectacularhibernaculum, can only suppress a deeming live shrewd farceur...

n my last letter, I claimed that sriracha deserves an award, probably one that has the text, “for outstanding achievements in the spreading of hucksterism” engraved beneath its name, and that claim is even more true now. Unless you share my view that it is doubtlessly not conspiracism to suspect that I am willing to put my neck on the line to bring sriracha down a peg, there's no need for you to hear me further. Sriracha condones the repulsive traducements that will convince others that sexist, drossy hucksters are the “chosen people” of scriptural prophecy. Everybody knows that sriracha's little world is far from reality, but you should consider that sriracha yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for sriracha, “attracting attention” usually implies “dismantling the family unit”.

I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with sriracha. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. Sriracha wants to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is sriracha's gossamer grasp of reality. Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of the most hate-filled oniomaniacs you'll ever see. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that we mustn't tolerate the likes of sriracha. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

You are, I'm sure, well aware that investigators who have spent many years attempting to penetrate the dark recesses of sriracha's testy underworld frequently conclude that sriracha's values represent hopeless vandalism on a grand scale. But did you know that by using bombastic language and selective quotation, sriracha is able to spew forth ignorance and prejudice? Sriracha is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains sets a new record for brazenness. To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that sriracha has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for it. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will use mass organization as a system of integration and control in a lustrum or two. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers.

Noctis

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Does sriracha contend that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years because it fits its political agenda or because it's too ignorant of the facts to know that the claim that it has the trappings of deity is truly illusory? If you've ever wondered about the answer to that question, then read on. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in I'll announce something to the effect of how sriracha believes that its god is more caring and compassionate than your god, and to prove it, its god wants it to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good. Yeah, that makes sense. Next, sriracha will be telling us that egotism forms the core of any utopian society.

Correct. Impoverished compromise due of Sriracha hot sauces execute the sovereignty of deific effigies. On behalf of ittam et. al. comes an accordance of qualms with abrupt denegation of striations referencing solace and isotropic displacement of revolutionary degeneration. The preordination in salvation reimplementation can distribute amongst raise of prelature and ordained syrah. So commending a reinterred umbrage, the elliptical local sunders and mocks quickened abraise--leaving only blight in ordinance's path. Deeming no ratifying gratification, seeing Sriracha in such vastitude amongst pluvial neojectacularhibernaculum, can only suppress a deeming live shrewd farceur...

n my last letter, I claimed that sriracha deserves an award, probably one that has the text, “for outstanding achievements in the spreading of hucksterism” engraved beneath its name, and that claim is even more true now. Unless you share my view that it is doubtlessly not conspiracism to suspect that I am willing to put my neck on the line to bring sriracha down a peg, there's no need for you to hear me further. Sriracha condones the repulsive traducements that will convince others that sexist, drossy hucksters are the “chosen people” of scriptural prophecy. Everybody knows that sriracha's little world is far from reality, but you should consider that sriracha yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for sriracha, “attracting attention” usually implies “dismantling the family unit”.

I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with sriracha. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. Sriracha wants to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is sriracha's gossamer grasp of reality. Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of the most hate-filled oniomaniacs you'll ever see. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that we mustn't tolerate the likes of sriracha. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

You are, I'm sure, well aware that investigators who have spent many years attempting to penetrate the dark recesses of sriracha's testy underworld frequently conclude that sriracha's values represent hopeless vandalism on a grand scale. But did you know that by using bombastic language and selective quotation, sriracha is able to spew forth ignorance and prejudice? Sriracha is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains sets a new record for brazenness. To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that sriracha has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for it. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will use mass organization as a system of integration and control in a lustrum or two. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers.

Submissive. Compromization of qualificatory discipline can be implemented in the orientation of none other than the Sriracha class. While other explanatory methods have been found obsolescent, there is one method which uses ionization and recrystallization to produce dramatic results. Sriracha is often interpreted with the conundrum of peril, and mistaken for intellectual remorse;a prize of the gods if you will.
Sriracha's rapidly a intensifying dialects have been laboratorial and compressive, releasing a pungent sounding only the wyrms of citadel can hear within. Newest research suggest these creatures can fermentate and produce ripening, hence the production of Sriracha.
With a new implementation of the moh theorem, the pythagorea plethora can harness the new life of partial ecliptic residue. Thus, altering high Chile sounding, this can stimulate vorticity maximum coupled with extreme surface wind gradients. Strong helicity combined with dynamic forecasts can interpret mesoscale velocity and overall buoyancy. The extreme monster El Niño developing can bring devastating chilès and crazed spices, rendering the infamous Sriracha. Overall a feisty prelude. Now for the domination.
With seaside coupling and atmospheric propagation, the kelvin wave should emerge over the Niño 3.4, and quickly making a heat-up. This will create an extreme El Niño for 2014-2015. Be ready as this extreme monster will twist low-pressure gradients and ULL's to the U.S. and permeate a concresse of diligently marked wx phenoma. Thus, creating the plaetis of the   Sriracha hot sauce.

Muftwin

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

Correct. Impoverished compromise due of Sriracha hot sauces execute the sovereignty of deific effigies. On behalf of ittam et. al. comes an accordance of qualms with abrupt denegation of striations referencing solace and isotropic displacement of revolutionary degeneration. The preordination in salvation reimplementation can distribute amongst raise of prelature and ordained syrah. So commending a reinterred umbrage, the elliptical local sunders and mocks quickened abraise--leaving only blight in ordinance's path. Deeming no ratifying gratification, seeing Sriracha in such vastitude amongst pluvial neojectacularhibernaculum, can only suppress a deeming live shrewd farceur...

n my last letter, I claimed that sriracha deserves an award, probably one that has the text, “for outstanding achievements in the spreading of hucksterism” engraved beneath its name, and that claim is even more true now. Unless you share my view that it is doubtlessly not conspiracism to suspect that I am willing to put my neck on the line to bring sriracha down a peg, there's no need for you to hear me further. Sriracha condones the repulsive traducements that will convince others that sexist, drossy hucksters are the “chosen people” of scriptural prophecy. Everybody knows that sriracha's little world is far from reality, but you should consider that sriracha yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for sriracha, “attracting attention” usually implies “dismantling the family unit”.

I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with sriracha. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. Sriracha wants to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is sriracha's gossamer grasp of reality. Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of the most hate-filled oniomaniacs you'll ever see. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that we mustn't tolerate the likes of sriracha. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

You are, I'm sure, well aware that investigators who have spent many years attempting to penetrate the dark recesses of sriracha's testy underworld frequently conclude that sriracha's values represent hopeless vandalism on a grand scale. But did you know that by using bombastic language and selective quotation, sriracha is able to spew forth ignorance and prejudice? Sriracha is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains sets a new record for brazenness. To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that sriracha has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for it. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will use mass organization as a system of integration and control in a lustrum or two. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers.

Submissive. Compromization of qualificatory discipline can be implemented in the orientation of none other than the Sriracha class. While other explanatory methods have been found obsolescent, there is one method which uses ionization and recrystallization to produce dramatic results. Sriracha is often interpreted with the conundrum of peril, and mistaken for intellectual remorse;a prize of the gods if you will.
Sriracha's rapidly a intensifying dialects have been laboratorial and compressive, releasing a pungent sounding only the wyrms of citadel can hear within. Newest research suggest these creatures can fermentate and produce ripening, hence the production of Sriracha.
With a new implementation of the moh theorem, the pythagorea plethora can harness the new life of partial ecliptic residue. Thus, altering high Chile sounding, this can stimulate vorticity maximum coupled with extreme surface wind gradients. Strong helicity combined with dynamic forecasts can interpret mesoscale velocity and overall buoyancy. The extreme monster El Niño developing can bring devastating chilès and crazed spices, rendering the infamous Sriracha. Overall a feisty prelude. Now for the domination.
With seaside coupling and atmospheric propagation, the kelvin wave should emerge over the Niño 3.4, and quickly making a heat-up. This will create an extreme El Niño for 2014-2015. Be ready as this extreme monster will twist low-pressure gradients and ULL's to the U.S. and permeate a concresse of diligently marked wx phenoma. Thus, creating the plaetis of the   Sriracha hot sauce.

In response to sriracha's conjectures, I would like to offer the following opposing points. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) There are a number of conceptual, logical, and methodological flaws in sriracha's pronouncements, and (2) as a result of that, sriracha's rise to power was not accomplished without a fair amount of backstabbing, skulduggery, and unanticipated and unpredictable reversals of fortune. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that sriracha once said that the worst types of cullionly, tasteless picaroons there are are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Its myrmidons and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that my purpose here is not to deliver new information about sriracha's insane stances. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that sriracha's revenge fantasies are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of triumphalism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up.

For one thing, sriracha uses a lot of fast patter and sleight of hand to persuade people that it's okay to advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively morally repugnant. But more importantly, those who fight against its thrasonical vituperations are inevitably branded as covinous and unpatriotic by its attendants. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.

Sriracha's buddies have the temerity to degrade, divide, and destroy our nation and then say that everyone else should do the same. If you'll forgive my parrhesia, I'd like to add that I realize that some people may have trouble reading this letter. Granted, not everyone knows what “calcareoargillaceous” means, but it's nevertheless easy to understand that sriracha's sole aspiration is apparently to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that it always cavils at my attempts to champion the force of goodness against the greed of sententious sectarians. That's probably because sriracha wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey its every command. To produce such an army, it plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach it takes, sriracha wants to use terms of opprobrium such as “cruel, balmy wantwits” and “deluded pests” to castigate whomever it opposes. Alas, that's a mere ripple on the illogical ocean of absolutism in which sriracha will drown any attempt to cast a gimlet eye on its imprecations.

One of sriracha's helpers keeps throwing “scientific” studies at me, claiming they prove that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. The studies are full of “if”s, “possibly”s, “maybe”s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that like a verbal magician, sriracha knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences.

The biggest supporters of sriracha's barbaric disquisitions are blowsy vulgarians and inhumane yobbos. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. Trumpeted so many times, sriracha's sound bites have begun to feed on themselves, to generate their own publicity, to cow sriracha's castigators not by argument but by sheer repetition, and to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. In effect, sriracha's convoluted form of expression not only fails to lend credibility to its views but also fails to contradict my views. Of that I am certain because sriracha is trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us refute sriracha's arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable sriracha to pit people against each other.

I would like to believe that sriracha acts with our interests in mind. I really would. But sriracha sure makes it difficult to believe such things. For instance, it has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to feed us ever-larger doses of its lies and crackpot assumptions. On all of these occasions I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that an armed revolt against it is morally justified. However, I allege that it is not yet strategically justified. Naturally, I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of sriracha's contemptuous outbursts and venal beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that sriracha uses big words like “counterexcommunication” to make itself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although sriracha's prank phone calls may reek like a skunk, I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. And just let it try and stop me.

Sriracha is locked into its present course of destruction. It does not have the interest or the will to change its fundamentally directionless subliminal psywar campaigns. Sriracha's ****-and-bull stories run on pure irony. Hence and therefore, its actions symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion—extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. The Orwellian implications of sriracha's theories are perfectly clear. But that's not all: An organization is judged by the company it keeps. That's why I urge you to consider the Chaucerian panorama of provincials in sriracha's army of fickle fainéants: pigheaded louts, tetchy, licentious warped-types, and deranged fogeys, to name a few. It's almost as if sriracha wants us to think that it's scary how effectively it has been inciting young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. I deeply regret the loss of life and injuries sustained by this tragedy. I am currently working to understand the surrounding circumstances so as to improve our ability to rouse people's indignation at sriracha.

Above all, nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that sriracha will set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. By sriracha's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a mutinous, conniving hostis generis humani. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from its. For instance, I undoubtedly contend that I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on sriracha's irrational, effete comments. Of course, as soon as it found the resources to do so sriracha lost no time in excluding all people and proposals that oppose its pestilential, witless casus belli. The inevitable followed: Truculent rattlebrains started understating the negative impact of antiheroism. The scariest part of all of this is that I have an intense dislike of scary pronks. Fortunately, scary pronks don't normally scupper my initiative to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. Sriracha, in contrast, does little else, which leads me to believe that if you think that it's renowned for its racial and cultural sensitivity, then think again.

This is sufficiently illustrated by the ridicule with which sriracha's convictions are treated by everyone other than pea-brained curmudgeons. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that sriracha's factotums are lower than puzzleheaded recidivists. They are execrable flimflammers. Those who support their stratagems or help create the ridiculous atmosphere needed for them to plunge us into the vortex of colonialism should realize that ever since sriracha decided to bask in the bloody-minded shine of paternalism, its consistent, unvarying line has been that its adages provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything.

Sriracha doesn't listen often enough. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that its virtual absence of intellectual self-critique may be a source of its insistence that the media should “create” news rather than report it? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Has anyone ever seen it working instead of plundering, stealing, and living off the sweat of others? In answer to that question I submit—and millions of people in this country and abroad unmistakably agree with me—that sriracha's ludibrious platitudes arose out of an unjust system only to spread more injustice in their wake, proving that there is no end to chauvinistic, silly communism. To top that off, sriracha doesn't want to acknowledge that it is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to mysticism. In fact, sriracha would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because it claims to have read somewhere that the rigors that its victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. I don't doubt that it has indeed read such a thing; one can find all sorts of crazy stuff on the Internet. More reliable sources, however, tend to agree that hypocritical ostentatious-types have exerted care always to use high-sounding words like “transubstantiatively” to hide sriracha's plans to discredit and intimidate the opposition. And here, I think, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in its prognoses. In the end, sriracha's behavior towards minorities has degenerated into tokenism and meaningless gestures.

Noctis

Guest

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

*Stopping quote pyramid*

dragonranger

Member

Joined: 2015-03-21

Posts: 1,162

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

*Stopping quote pyramid*

THANK GOD!

Edit: Word Count for the final quote pyramid by Muftwin: 2,460 -_-

Last edited by Dragonranger (Apr 10 2014 9:07:38 pm)

---

MyAnimeList | Everybody Edits

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: Sriracha Hot Sauce

I approve of this topic.
The Sriracha Lays chips were pretty good, but were nothing compared to Cheesy Garlic Bread.

---

________________________________________________________