Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The idea is simple, a tinychat... The only thing is that you connect to prove that you are really that user.
Basicly an modified client connected to same EE but with chat and no guardians.
Does someone wants that?
Last edited by The Doctor (Oct 4 2014 2:15:30 am)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I don't think it works, i don't want to acess another website just to chat.
Actually this should be in Bots and programming
Last edited by Creature (Oct 3 2014 1:08:55 pm)
This is a false statement.
Offline
I don't think it works, i don't want to acess another website just to chat.
Actually this should be in Bots and programming
1. Why it cant work?
2. The bot will contain a mini IE browser and on the right the chat it self.
3. Well I belive that's is to all public information. On bots and programming seems to respond only programmers and people who have an idea for BALs.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
1. Why it cant work?
If someone chatless try to chat, it will give error, bot can't do anything to prevent that.
2. The bot will contain a mini IE browser and on the right the chat it self.
What?
3. Well I belive that's is to all public information. On bots and programming seems to respond only programmers and people who have an idea for BALs.
If the main focus is a bot, it goes to Bots and programming, no mather what, just hope people read it.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Creature i belive you didnt understand me.
The chat inteagreated in bot is independent from EE. Its just use the same verfication(email and password) to authentificate you as "reidolol". In tinychat even I can to take the name "reidolol".This bot will take your username from EE. The only person that can limitate your chat in bot is me. So Guardians will not hear what you chat. I will ban them. I will integrate ZBot with this independ chat so you will have an bot with comands again. Think like an modifiied EE client thats connected to same EE but you have chat and Guardians cant ban you.
Last edited by The Doctor (Oct 4 2014 2:13:37 am)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I said i don't want to use another website to chat, much less tinychat.
This is a false statement.
Offline
I said i don't want to use another website to chat, much less tinychat.
And I'm trying to say that nothing will be different as befoure... You will can chat like you did before, but Guardians will can't listen. Of corse this will toke lot of time and may be useless if MrShoe adds again chat for free.
Last edited by The Doctor (Oct 4 2014 6:54:01 am)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
or download a key logger and have it record when you hit a certain shorcut then when you hit that shortcut again it will send the message
If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.
Offline
@The Doctor
Note: don't trust your end user with anything. (someone come by to prove me wrong)
You can't trust what EE tells you is my username. Easy: WPE filters "RANDOM" to "MrShoe" -- But I'm not MrShoe. But you think I am.
Basically, my point being... you need to be testing authentication through a trusted channel.
Bad idea: Have bot send encrypted username/pass to you so you decrypt and send to PlayerIO to test.
Better idea: Have user connect bot to config world where you have a bot. User enters specific smiley/chat auth string to verify.
My idea: I originally had a short project (right before chat was publicized) where a program encodes base 64 to the basic smileys and back to send strings through EE to be decoded. It was working with coins but they patched that. The authentication would be naturally enforced by PlayerIO.
Offline
sounds pointless, just buy chat.
Offline
sounds pointless, just buy chat.
good idea, wonder why this isnt so popular
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1741837645.8522 - Generated in 0.059 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.55 MiB (Peak: 1.72 MiB) ]