Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

Advertisement

Hello, visitor! These forums are run off of the revenue generated from these ads. If you'd like to support us, please whitelist us or consider donating:

#1 Re: Forum Discussion » Is encoded rule breaking allowed? » Yesterday 13:52:43

No, rulebreaking is rulebreaking even if you try to cover it up. Just don't break the rules, I seriously doubt you really need to.

#2 Re: Forum Discussion » Make Signature MaxHeight be able to changed in users settings » 2018-12-13 18:26:09

mikelolsuperman wrote:
Different55 wrote:

For people who insist on enforcing their own stylistic choices on the web, the Stylus extension is highly recommended. This is exactly what it's for. Most people don't care, and this doesn't add enough value to make an entire option for it, IMO the entire profile section is already needlessly complicated.

Um that's for firefox browser only. Didn't know they had extentions though.

Every browser has extensions or addons or plugins in some form. Firefox and Chrome have "stores" stuffed full of them.

#3 Re: Forum Discussion » Make Signature MaxHeight be able to changed in users settings » 2018-12-13 01:10:26

For people who insist on enforcing their own stylistic choices on the web, the Stylus extension is highly recommended. This is exactly what it's for. Most people don't care, and this doesn't add enough value to make an entire option for it, IMO the entire profile section is already needlessly complicated.

#4 Re: Off-Topic Discussion » What is your Favorite Hot Manga? » 2018-12-12 02:31:16

We generally try to avoid hot things on this good christian website.

#5 Re: Forum Discussion » the signature previeuw in your profile when editing it its misleading » 2018-12-09 22:50:45

Crybaby wrote:
HG wrote:
Crybaby wrote:

Just add the maximum dimensions to the edit page itself. I don't know when it was removed, but when making my new signature I had to go through the motions of discovering for myself the exact dimensions.

It was never removed, because it was never added in the first place.

Signatures are still meant to be viewed at their entirety through user profiles, and the maximum height on posts is already well known. There's honestly no reason to add such restriction to the editor.
If you still want such restriction, use a custom theme that sets max-height: 300px; for .postsignature in general.

If I'm remembering correctly, I distinctly remember it being a thing on the old forumify forums under Cyclone. Actually, having a signature of a certain size was a part of the rules enforced by the moderation team back then.

It's clearly not well known enough, I mean I had no clue what it was and surely there are others too who won't know of it.

It won't be a restriction on what you can make your signature, just a small bit of text saying what the maximum size is if you want your signature to be completely visible.

It was part of the rules here, too, but we ended up just baking it into the forums. No need to warn people for having extra-large signatures if the height limit is enforced. It'd still be nice to have that limit listed on the page though, you're right.

#6 Re: Forum Discussion » the signature previeuw in your profile when editing it its misleading » 2018-12-09 17:38:08

Fit vertically I think. The preview might not have the 300px height limit on it.

#7 Re: Forum Discussion » How do you send a PM on the forums? » 2018-12-09 15:12:15

Moved to Forum Discussion, and you should be able to send PMs now.

While 100 posts is technically the limit it's not expected or intended for anyone to reach that.

#8 Re: Off-Topic Discussion » Anyone knows good blender tutorials? » 2018-12-09 00:32:38

Diff doesn't really know any good tutorials. Find something you want to do then find a tutorial to do that until you have a good idea of where things are in Blender and the tools you need to get where you want to go.

#9 Re: Forum Discussion » Remove IP Bans » 2018-12-03 18:19:24

Anatoly wrote:
Luka504 wrote:

My only question is - why?

Is there any good reason to remove IP bans other than you being incapable of avoiding those bans?

1 days not being able to see the forums for saying "No." - Spam Minor

3 days not being able to see the forums for saying "Move this to forum discussion its not about he game" - Minimod

7 days not being able to see the forums for saying "F*** you got me this time" - Swear

31 days not being able to see the forums for saying "Diff is <snip>" - Personal Info, but known fact.

I don't care how well known it is, if I (or anyone else) doesn't want it any more known, it ends there.

#11 Re: Off-Topic Discussion » Off-Topic Discussion thread » 2018-12-01 02:14:55

Doesn't deserve its own topic, merged with the general discussion thread.

#13 Re: Off-Topic Discussion » The Minimodding Paradox » 2018-11-30 16:34:29

I'm just going to lock this. Apparently staying on topic is too much to ask.

#14 Re: Forum Discussion » I'm permabanned in EE Wiki. » 2018-11-30 16:32:56

I'm not sure what any of you are doing here. He knows why he was banned. I know why he was banned. I currently don't have any plans to change that. I have 0 idea what the rest of you are going on about but you can safely exit the topic at this point.

#15 Re: Off-Topic Discussion » The Minimodding Paradox » 2018-11-30 16:00:26

I shouldn't have to say this but don't do that

#16 Re: Questions and Answers » 2 questions » 2018-11-29 05:37:00

KirbyKareem wrote:

If I purposely gave my password to someone, and they delete my worlds, waste my gems, ruin my account, etc, will I be able to / allowed to restore it?

I'm not game staff, but no, it's not possible to restore it. Do not give your password out to *anyone* no matter who they are or what they say.

#17 Re: Forum Business » Update Discussion for forums » 2018-11-28 21:47:46

Even if a topic in Landfill is unlocked, normal users don't have the permissions needed to post in there. It's not necessarily for locked topic but every topic that's trash enough to get put there is going to be locked.

#18 Re: Forum Business » Update Discussion for forums » 2018-11-28 21:11:15

They were promoted to admins so the forums wouldn't be left adminless while I was going through some stuff. Then I decided they were kinda handy as admins so they stayed there. Then hummerz left.

#19 Re: Forum Business » Update Discussion for forums » 2018-11-28 14:09:51

RailMat wrote:
Different55 wrote:

New warning type Garbage that's essentially Spam (Major). Because apparently you guys think that the existence of Landfill means you guys need to fill it. It'll be handed out in response to topics that are clearly shooting for the landfill. It's a 3 point warning, so it's enough to immediately tick you up to the next tier of ban lengths from wherever you currently are. It sticks around for 6 months so if you try to pull the same thing when you're unbanned, that'll be another tier it kicks up.

Why are some warnings longer or shorter than the formula: points * 2 = length in months

at no point has that formula been used

peace wrote:
Different55 wrote:

Considering it's a warning you literally have to make an effort to achieve, I disagree. Put the tiniest amount of effort into anything and you'd never see it.

what if youre not sure if it belongs there or you think its fits fine in offtopic and post tto it an dget ban? i would make it a 8 months lasting 2 points

Purposefully aiming for the Landfill is the qualifying thing for the Garbage warning.

#20 Re: Forum Discussion » Official Intro/Outro Thread » 2018-11-28 06:39:21

Someone moved the thread between two forums and left a redirect topic behind. The redirect was then tossed into the landfill.

#21 Re: Forum Business » Update Discussion for forums » 2018-11-28 06:37:54

Considering it's a warning you literally have to make an effort to achieve, I disagree. Put the tiniest amount of effort into anything and you'd never see it.

#22 Re: Forum Business » Update Discussion for forums » 2018-11-28 05:55:44

New warning type Garbage that's essentially Spam (Major). Because apparently you guys think that the existence of Landfill means you guys need to fill it. It'll be handed out in response to topics that are clearly shooting for the landfill. It's a 3 point warning, so it's enough to immediately tick you up to the next tier of ban lengths from wherever you currently are. It sticks around for 6 months so if you try to pull the same thing when you're unbanned, that'll be another tier it kicks up.

#23 Re: Forum Discussion » Mute topic button » 2018-11-27 23:23:54

mikelolsuperman wrote:
Different55 wrote:

Then don't check it or use the Active topics list to see exactly what topics are active without diving into the individual forums.

It makes me think that there is another suggestion but then it's just a comment on something I don't wanna see. And using the active thing doesn't help like at all and doesn't have to do anything with this.

A mute topic button won't solve that. Your solution is "just quit clicking on it"

#24 Re: Forum Discussion » Mute topic button » 2018-11-27 20:53:28

Then don't check it or use the Active topics list to see exactly what topics are active without diving into the individual forums.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1544842800.8354 - Generated in 0.547 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.97 MiB (Peak: 5.53 MiB) ]