Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
attack peace
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Do we have to have this discussion again?
mutantdevle wrote:You may also not post twice within the last 5 posts. This means if your post is post number 67, then you cannot post again until post number 62. This means 4 other players would have posted before you do.
Everytime you break this rule, you will lose 10% of your points (rounded up).
It doesn't say anywhere that my action is canceled. The action is performed with a deduct of 10% points of total points as penalty.
It also doesn't tell you that you can't attack multiple people in 1 post or use an alt to post 4 times between your own post or create your own actions to perform, but if anyone tried any of those, then I wouldn't permit it. I'm enforcing the rules in the way I intend them. You are actively trying to exploit the rules. They are clear enough the way they are and don't expect to achieve anything by blatantly attempting to cheat.
John cannot be attacked until post 209!
RailMat cannot be attacked until post 210!
actack th eone wiht the most points
You must specify exactly who you want to attack in your post. This post will be counted as a comment. (Besides, the person with the most points is defending anyway so you'd actually lose points here).
thanksLOL tried to attack RailMat but failed. RailMat steals 4 points from thanksLOL!
John stole 223 points from peace!
Onjit stole 111 points from peace!
xfrogman43 stole 56 points from peace!
Offline
Zumza wrote:Do we have to have this discussion again?
mutantdevle wrote:You may also not post twice within the last 5 posts. This means if your post is post number 67, then you cannot post again until post number 62. This means 4 other players would have posted before you do.
Everytime you break this rule, you will lose 10% of your points (rounded up).
It doesn't say anywhere that my action is canceled. The action is performed with a deduct of 10% points of total points as penalty.
It also doesn't tell you that you can't attack multiple people in 1 post or use an alt to post 4 times between your own post or create your own actions to perform, but if anyone tried any of those, then I wouldn't permit it. I'm enforcing the rules in the way I intend them. You are actively trying to exploit the rules. They are clear enough the way they are and don't expect to achieve anything by blatantly attempting to cheat.
I'm not cheating. This is what is written. You break the rule = 10% penalty, and nothing more than that.
Also rules specif that you can attack another person. Singular.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
John cannot be attacked until post 219!
Onjit cannot be attacked until post 220!
RailMat cannot be attacked until post 221!
mutantdevle wrote:Zumza wrote:Do we have to have this discussion again?
mutantdevle wrote:You may also not post twice within the last 5 posts. This means if your post is post number 67, then you cannot post again until post number 62. This means 4 other players would have posted before you do.
Everytime you break this rule, you will lose 10% of your points (rounded up).
It doesn't say anywhere that my action is canceled. The action is performed with a deduct of 10% points of total points as penalty.
It also doesn't tell you that you can't attack multiple people in 1 post or use an alt to post 4 times between your own post or create your own actions to perform, but if anyone tried any of those, then I wouldn't permit it. I'm enforcing the rules in the way I intend them. You are actively trying to exploit the rules. They are clear enough the way they are and don't expect to achieve anything by blatantly attempting to cheat.
I'm not cheating. This is what is written. You break the rule = 10% penalty, and nothing more than that.
Also rules specif that you can attack another person. Singular.
To put it simply: I don't care. It may not be written, but it's still a rule. Some rules aren't written because they are obvious. You are free to interpret the rules how you like, but I will enforce them the way they are intended. For example, the rules don't specify that you can't do what peace did and say "I want to attack the player with the most points". He's still specifying who he wants to attack, I'm still not allowing it. It's obvious that your posts aren't counted if they don't follow the rules, otherwise, what's the point of the rule? And I've clearly been enforcing it that way this entire thread. Either play like everyone else is or leave. The choice is yours. But either way, your attempts to exploit the rules will not and never will be successful.
Offline
You should do what peace says and target the players with most points at the time of that post, in my opinion. You can't update the leaderboard for each post, and nor should we take that evidence. It's hard to know what's accepted and not. Some rules are obvious just to you only, the rest of us are left with just reading the OP which clearly isn't well formulated.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
defend
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
i think the defend time should be reduced
its too easy to get into a virtually impenetrable position where you just defend every 10 posts and attack the next highest score
this isnt a slight against john or anything, i was doing the exact same thing a few days ago
btw defend
:.|:;
Offline
attack mutantdevleedlfel
f
sd
[ Started around 1731566121.4586 - Generated in 0.053 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.63 MiB (Peak: 1.84 MiB) ]