Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Just something I thought of.
Offline
Yay more cpu usage
Offline
A similar alternative could be a constant room list refresh function, which however, doesn't delete the current list before loading the new one, but replaces it with new list after fully loaded.
And I doubt it would dramatically increase CPU usage. It could increase memory usage however, because of the requirement of additional room list variables that this function would use; as well as network usage.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1715876125.1938 - Generated in 0.020 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.34 MiB (Peak: 1.42 MiB) ]