Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Can we do community nominations for every contest?
I hope something like that can be arranged for future contests. Sadly, me and Chris have always had differing opinions about how the judging should be done.
BEE wrote:Can we do community nominations for every contest?
I hope something like that can be arranged for future contests. Sadly, me and Chris have always had differing opinions about how the judging should be done.
Hey RPG,can you give me the feedback for my level?Please and thank you.
Master1 wrote:so lets say, We get 3rd for this, and EX rates our level 1st... Do we take 2nd place?
We have yet to discuss these kinds of details, so we'll see.
Here's the idea I had in mind that I'd like more ^^
random level places 3rd in EX, 1st in official
They take the prize from the official.
random level places 2nd in official, 1st in EX
They take the prize from EX
random level places 3rd in EX, 2nd in official
They take the prize from official
random level doesnt place in official, places 3rd in EX
they take 3rd place prizes.
See? my idea is that wherever you placed higher, that's the prize you should recieve. Just because 2 judge differently doesn't mean your level didn't have what it takes to be a higher place.
Offline
Thanks rpgmaster2000... and i also sent u a message... please look at it. Its important
so rpgmaster2000, When`s the next competition gonna be up?
I think that this contest wasn't organized, and that's why people are complaining about time, updates and how it was unfair and all. If Chris wants to make something all up to us, the update that he said that is coming up in Christmas, it has to be supberb. Sure, there's holiday bricks and all that, but make a new block pack or so that actually is a used object like gravity and such. If he wants to make this up to us it has to be big.
sorry for not reading the posts, but im using my cellphone to post this:
could the next judges be more based on originaly of ideas?
thanks
sooo number 20 the LOLROFL crew dosnt even get an honarable mention? cause that really stinks I at least wanted the oumpkin and me and my freinds worked hard on that world
Last edited by toonlink9567 (Nov 29 2011 7:12:28 pm)
They haven't said the honorable mentions yet. -_-
Thanks Bobithan for the sig, love it <3 "You will never know how valuable a thing or a person is...until its not with you anymore, then you`ll regret..."
Offline
^^ This
I think teams who were close to winning, but were just a little not quite up there should at least get an honorable mention.
CoV might have won if we didn't mess up our mini games, but we are ok where we stand. But I feel that other teams like, Irakas Halloween Night, SCAR, 32 Crew, and LAG Crew at least deserve an honorable mention. They are all very good as well.
Last edited by Calicara (Nov 29 2011 7:27:24 pm)
I think mine deserves one and also I didn't like the art in 32 crew's world. -.-
Thanks Bobithan for the sig, love it <3 "You will never know how valuable a thing or a person is...until its not with you anymore, then you`ll regret..."
Offline
^uh wheres cod-storm
Offline
cod-storm and SCAR are automatic honorable mentions duh because they're awesome. =3
Thanks Bobithan for the sig, love it <3 "You will never know how valuable a thing or a person is...until its not with you anymore, then you`ll regret..."
Offline
Just a little quick thing that I want to say. Sef's level was a level that he made a while ago, and added halloween like figures to it. I know that because I played this level when I was a NON-CHAT, and it didn't say happy halloween or have any of that stuff. Just sayin...
As was said last contest, having "finalists" would help cut down complaints.
Basically cut it down to "Who is not DQed, has art, and has minis"
Then cut that down to a "Top 25"
Then cut it down to the winners.
Just so people who lost aren't paired with the same level as people who were DQed.
On a side note:
Ummm, and next time there's a contest, we should probably not let Chris handle anything except ok the prizes. He messes things up a lot, even though he has good intentions.
is hilarious!
Offline
Just a little quick thing that I want to say. Sef's level was a level that he made a while ago, and added halloween like figures to it. I know that because I played this level when I was a NON-CHAT, and it didn't say happy halloween or have any of that stuff. Just sayin...
I think my teams level deserves 2nd place, and many others do. Now i found out this i feel even more angry, this is cheating! RPG....
Last edited by treejoe4 (Nov 29 2011 7:40:51 pm)
lol ^
^ agreed
but it might be too late for that now.
I know RPGMaster2000 said no re-judge, but do you really think it's fair that someone just took an old level, slapped Happy Halloween on it, then got second place? That's bull. Some people spent hours an weeks on their level.
It's a good idea
But are they going to visit the levels as they are right now?
Cause me and my teams lvl looks bad because of the candy decoration update, and cola1 (our leader who also hosted the lvl) is away for a while and I cant fix it back up.
I know RPGMaster2000 said no re-judge, but do you really think it's fair that someone just took an old level, slapped Happy Halloween on it, then got second place? That's bull. Some people spent hours an weeks on their level.
One of many quotes I have seen recently:
They should not have won anyone because of their overall attitudes and maturity levels.
Okay seriously putting my foot down here.
Stop it with the ad hominem attacks. (If you don't know what that is, google it.)
Just because someone is an **** or a cheater doesn't mean the level sucks.
In this case, the level does suck, but not because they are immature or stupid people. The level sucks on its own merit.
It's like saying that MFL's levels are bad because he can be an ****. Yes, he can indeed be an ****, but typically his levels are well made.
Someone's personality =/= someone's work
If you want to do a personality contest by all means talk about the players. But he only thing we evaluate here is the levels.
/rant
Last edited by BEE (Nov 29 2011 8:30:49 pm)
Offline
jfurey14 wrote:Just a little quick thing that I want to say. Sef's level was a level that he made a while ago, and added halloween like figures to it. I know that because I played this level when I was a NON-CHAT, and it didn't say happy halloween or have any of that stuff. Just sayin...
I think my teams level deserves 2nd place, and many others do. Now i found out this i feel even more angry, this is cheating! RPG....
Maybe I think I deserve first, but did I get it? No. Live with it.
I dont care that much about getting 2nd, i just dont see any reason why it deserves 2nd place.
But you also put time and effort in your level, you actually tried. At least your level was good. Even if it didn't get first you still got second, you know why? Because you TRIED, because you made a GOOD level.
SS Haunted Cave was just terrible, and not even well made. Why should horrible entry get second place, when there are other teams that are WAY better, like cod-stormers, and SCAR. Are you gonna tell me SS Haunted Cave is better than SCAR?
I don't know why RPGMaster2000 picked that level at all.
Look at it like this:
Kid 1 makes a semi-decent drawing.
Three months later he reads about an art contest, so he enters the drawing from three months ago.
Kids 2, 3, and 4 also read about this contest and decided to enter as well, but they make their entries a week ahead of time, and they are all very good.
In the final judging kid 1, with the semi-decent drawing gets 2nd place. Kid 2 with the excellent drawing gets third place, even though he clearly tried harder. Kid 3 wins first place, and Kid 4 gets nothing at all, even though his drawing was better than Kid 1 he lost, and why? That's the question.
[ Started around 1731682836.7359 - Generated in 0.092 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.67 MiB (Peak: 1.9 MiB) ]