Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
pls.
Offline
sad
I forgot to post a work around.
jQuery
$(".blockpost.liker").each(function(){
$(this).find(".postleft dl dd strong").html("Wooted by <a href='#" + $(this).prev().attr("id") + "'>" + $(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length + "</a> " + ($(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length == 1 ? "person" : "people") + ".");
});
Edit: fixed grammar when it comes to "1 person" and the number links to the post.
As nobody has bothered actually counting the woots on the staff position thread:
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
I forgot to post a work around.
jQuery $(".blockpost.liker").each(function(){ $(this).find(".postleft dl dd strong").html("Wooted by <a href='#" + $(this).prev().attr("id") + "'>" + $(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length + "</a> " + ($(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length == 1 ? "person" : "people") + "."); });
Edit: fixed grammar when it comes to "1 person" and the number links to the post.
i love you
Offline
Merged: Woot counter
Add Gosha's/Ratburntro's idea!
ee & eeforums gibs me depression
Offline
Already been suggested search: woot counter
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
not worth its own line, if this were to exist it should just be a number in parentheses ala "Wooted by (9):"
Offline
Offline
#merged
Offline
Because if many people woot it's just nice to see how many wooted exactly without having to count them manually.
Ingame: marten22 My steam: MartenM
Offline
AnatolyEE wrote:Because if many people woot it's just nice to see how many wooted exactly without having to count them manually.
You already see that the post wooted by many users, what else? Do you guys want a woot contest?
pls.
Offline
Diff, it's been a long day without this feature, my friend.
Offline
another year passes by, another diff doesn't reply
Offline
I forgot to post a work around.
jQuery $(".blockpost.liker").each(function(){ $(this).find(".postleft dl dd strong").html("Wooted by <a href='#" + $(this).prev().attr("id") + "'>" + $(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length + "</a> " + ($(this).find(".postright .postmsg p span").length == 1 ? "person" : "people") + "."); });
Edit: fixed grammar when it comes to "1 person" and the number links to the post.
As nobody has bothered actually counting the woots on the staff position thread:
https://i.koya.io/Prs5sv
Late, but if going for more correct English, it should be "person" or "persons." Tho persons sounds weird and so I like Gosha's version of "user" and "users."
Offline
another year passes by, another diff doesn't reply
I’d like to change my mind and support this idea.
why isn't this a thing already, genius. it also looks like something is missing when wooted by. only makes sense to add this
Close enough?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Offline
THANK u diff
guys let's woot my post to test if it works and find out the max number
How sad, nobody wooted your post yet.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
TaskManager wrote:THANK u diff
guys let's woot my post to test if it works and find out the max numberHow sad, nobody wooted your post yet.
https://i.imgur.com/Ejn8WUH.png
the button broke probably
Offline
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
dummy you have to click "Woot" on the right of my post for it to work
COME on
Offline
[ Started around 1714337891.0595 - Generated in 0.049 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.84 MiB (Peak: 2.1 MiB) ]