Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Dead crews now;
LX crew, GO! Crew
R.I.P.
Kk updated
B'awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, you added my crew <3
Royal Flush* not RF pwease?
ヽ(•‿•)ノ ❤ ♬ ✩ t u t u r u !~ ✧☁ ☂ ヽ(•‿•)ノ
Offline
Umm i guess I'll change it
I still lol at the fact that my former crew LP crew only lasted like a few weeks or something. I always knew they had no potential.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Well, soneone other than me (Soccerfrak006) said that my crew (DSC Crew) had potential and ended up joining. So I'm not self-nominating.
Kk i will check you guys out
Let's go MG!
You could add one Crew,though I'm inactive for that crew.
Oh look, Beex is on there
We're planning on releasing a new level soon(ish) (:<
Offline
Cant wait to see it
I think nazty crew is the best. You should see their level!
Knew I Crew would be here
Go tiny crews! Let the nublets become blossoming pros!
oooo KO is on the list that you could get as good as? :O
yay 4 me
Offline
I think KO is still one of the crews with the most potential.
IDK about other "top" crews since I'm not in them.
Last edited by GKAbyss (Apr 24 2012 2:08:38 pm)
I think KO is still one of the crews with the most potential.
IDK about other "top" crews since I'm not in them.
true true, i was on and off about ko being on the list.
KO crew's levels are good, but in my opinion, not trying to say anything about anyone (if anyone, it's more directed at me lol), but ko crew doesn't spend that much time on levels. Sometimes they work for half the day, but if the levels kept being edited to "perfection," as if it were a contest level, (actually same for all crews, if they all don't keep editing their levels), they could probably all improve a lot. It just seems like, with me, and Ko crew, they only draw something once, and never go back and change things unless it looks bad. If people went back and changed things every time(even though it would take a lot longer) it would probably end up better.
[ Started around 1731741813.5869 - Generated in 0.041 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.61 MiB) ]