Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I think we should have a poll based on whether the lobby level lsit should be sorted by Woots or Players online in that level.
Sorted by Woots - 0
Sorted by Players in That Level - 10
I voted for players.
Last edited by Bimps (Nov 21 2012 7:13:04 pm)
Offline
players
Sorting like before the recent update. Active player online first, then plays as it indicates a finished map etc.
Hi.
Offline
Players.
The level rotation was much quicker and seemed to do a pretty good job at keeping the good levels at the top (It's tough for even a good level to get up to the 1000 woots that MrShoe's levels are almost always at)
Bosses also often do not have enough "On-time" to gain enough woots to make it even close to the top.
I think it should have an option for you to choose from both of this.
Alright, I'm updating right now. Lopoi2, I will not include your opinion(I respect it, but you can only choose form two options.)
I will explain why I chose players. I chose it because, well, let's look at sorted by woots and by players. Let's say there's this popular level. If you sort by players, it will dye (sp?)quicker. If sorted by woots, it'll dye in a day. Alright, so the level died out almost. 1 player is left. With player sorting, it will not be noticed,except by level scrollers. With woot sorting, it will be on the top or near, so actually it WON'T die (I got it right,to lazy to fix dye to die).
Also, MrShoe's levels are murdering the lobby.
Offline
Neither, the lobby needs level categories, such as boss levels, adventure etc.
Players, with a option to toggle between woots, players and total plays.
Neither, the lobby needs level categories, such as boss levels, adventure etc.
Man, why did nobody ever thought of that? Seriously, that's actually a pretty good idea if executed right.
Offline
Players.
I was kinda hoping Mr. Shoe would listen to us and change it when they gave it to non-betas :$
Neither, the lobby needs level categories, such as boss levels, adventure etc.
I agree with 0176, and would prefer that over other ideas, but how would it work?
Offline
I vote for Players.
Snap: CrypticPi
Instagram: Noncryptic
Offline
Players, definitely
Players. 100%.
Especially because it's been that way ever since the level sorting system, and now it's all tossed in the dumpster for some untested new feature we're not even sure we like yet.
Why not give the option for both?
It appears that sorting by players keeps levels circulating better, but I like the idea of rating good levels. Maybe if woots were replaced with being able rate levels one to five stars in three categories:
Gameplay
Difficulty
Visuals
(A higher difficulty rating doesn't necessarily mean a better level, but it would let you know how hard it is at a glance)
Players.
SquidMan338's idea seems good.
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1731817223.7036 - Generated in 0.044 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.62 MiB) ]