Official Everybody Edits Forums

Yogsfan101

Guest

Signs should be for non builders club memebers

I thinks signs should be for non builder club members because its kinda not fair that they get signs plus I don't wanna waste money for something that wont last really long also when I make adventure maps I wanna add text but I can't so if any of you agree with me and your a friend or something can you please talk to the ee mods about this?

Krock

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

"I want it!!", that's what MrShoe tries to reach, so he can make money with EE.
Now, if he would make it for free, then he has a less incoming value (which nobody wants).

You can try to send an email to MrShoe: julian[at]everybodyedits.com
Good luck with that.

AzurePudding

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

They should at least have it as a seperate purchase.   I have all the blocks except classic and beta blocks.   I don't want to pay 100 bucks a year just to use signs.   Signs are not worth 100 bucks a year.   Have beta be a seperate purchase again and include signs with it.   They'd be making more money this way.   People would still buy BC and more people would buy beta, instead of losing all those possible beta buyers because you're asking a hundred buck purchase for something as small as signs.

Helvi

Member

Joined: 2015-04-06

Posts: 1,132

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Wait for another discount.

---

Hi.

5600

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

"I want it!!", that's what MrShoe tries to reach, so he can make money with EE.
Now, if he would make it for free, then he has a less incoming value (which nobody wants).

You can try to send an email to MrShoe: julian[at]everybodyedits.com
Good luck with that.

Couldn't agree more in the 1st part.

Signs should not be released to anybody like candy. Why? Because people will use derogatory language on the signs and if they're banned, it wouldn't be a big thing since they just wasted energy. And since it's in the builders club it will be a good punishment if the person is banned for using it wrong because they loose money for the act. (Opinion)

Oh, and not to forget! if you get banned you can make another acc and keep making those childish mistakes. Nothing to loose; especially for starters.

AzurePudding

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

"I want it!!", that's what MrShoe tries to reach, so he can make money with EE.
Now, if he would make it for free, then he has a less incoming value (which nobody wants).

You can try to send an email to MrShoe: julian[at]everybodyedits.com
Good luck with that.

Couldn't agree more in the 1st part.

Signs should not be released to anybody like candy. Why? Because people will use derogatory language on the signs and if they're banned, it wouldn't be a big thing since they just wasted energy. And since it's in the builders club it will be a good punishment if the person is banned for using it wrong because they loose money for the act. (Opinion)

Oh, and not to forget! if you get banned you can make another acc and keep making those childish mistakes. Nothing to loose; especially for starters.

Err..

I think that's a non-point.   People can already write in blocks which can be seen in the minimap, unlike the text of a sign.   Hell, we even have chat now where people can curse as much as they feel like avoiding censors.   Having signs more available to people could help with better levels, or make them more interesting with some story.   More interesting levels = more players, more players = more customers, more customers = more moolah.   The main point of Builder's Club is for people to get access to all the blocks they need quickly.   Signs, however, cannot be gotten any other way other than paying 100 bucks a year, which I believe most people wouldn't do just for the signs.   I have just about everything.   I would not experience the full package of builder's club if I paid 100 bucks for a year.   This makes me not want to.   Even if at 50 bucks.   If they brought back the old beta seperate purchase and included signs with it, people would spend money on that rather than not spending at all as 100 dollars is asking for too much.  

If I want a tire, I'd like to be able to buy a tire, and not be forced to buy a whole car just for the tire I want.

Last edited by AzurePudding (Aug 1 2013 4:24:13 am)

Calicara

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Mrshore: "Silly non-BC members. You clearly can't handle the responsibility of putting signs in your level!"

MrShoe: Gives everyone free chat

Last edited by Calicara (Aug 1 2013 4:56:29 am)

5600

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

"I want it!!", that's what MrShoe tries to reach, so he can make money with EE.
Now, if he would make it for free, then he has a less incoming value (which nobody wants).

You can try to send an email to MrShoe: julian[at]everybodyedits.com
Good luck with that.

Couldn't agree more in the 1st part.

Signs should not be released to anybody like candy. Why? Because people will use derogatory language on the signs and if they're banned, it wouldn't be a big thing since they just wasted energy. And since it's in the builders club it will be a good punishment if the person is banned for using it wrong because they loose money for the act. (Opinion)

Oh, and not to forget! if you get banned you can make another acc and keep making those childish mistakes. Nothing to loose; especially for starters.

Err..

I think that's a non-point.   People can already write in blocks which can be seen in the minimap, unlike the text of a sign.   Hell, we even have chat now where people can curse as much as they feel like avoiding censors.   Having signs more available to people could help with better levels, or make them more interesting with some story.   More interesting levels = more players, more players = more customers, more customers = more moolah.   The main point of Builder's Club is for people to get access to all the blocks they need quickly.   Signs, however, cannot be gotten any other way other than paying 100 bucks a year, which I believe most people wouldn't do just for the signs.   I have just about everything.   I would not experience the full package of builder's club if I paid 100 bucks for a year.   This makes me not want to.   Even if at 50 bucks.   If they brought back the old beta seperate purchase and included signs with it, people would spend money on that rather than not spending at all as 100 dollars is asking for too much.  

If I want a tire, I'd like to be able to buy a tire, and not be forced to buy a whole car just for the tire I want.

I'm just going to address the bold part since that's like a counter to not getting signs for everyone. The rest of your paragraph is just making points of getting cash from the implement of signs, but I still doubt it will bring more players since it's going to be for everyone. (Less interesting)

Okay, now with the cursing with bricks in the minimap and the block text comparison. The block is to make others want to buy BC to use text so EE can get cash. And the chat thing being out for everyone is not a issue since Chris thoughts of it was just to get parents to let their kids play the game safely. 1 cent chat VS free chat? Not a big diff. My other point about cursing on the minimap is that the text block will grab more attention since that's the main point. Also, you will rarely see cursing on minimaps, the only 2 occasions of witnessing this is through a world that has a free code or a special person. I can't extend that enough.

The text block is a "owner responsibility" since only the owner can use it. (More easy to ban)
Seeing derogatory language will be hard to spot. You rarely see those worlds that have cursing to stay on the map. Also, if you see cursing it will mostly be in a free code world and that will be hard to spot the person causing the act. The owner of the world won't be banned.

!Sigg✚

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

I disagree, Signs should be BC only; because we paid for it.

Anch

Member

Joined: 2015-02-16

Posts: 5,447

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Why do we need signs? I saw a world where you open a google doc, then when you see a block on ee, you just turn to that page or someting on the google doc. Why waste money on bc...

Helvi

Member

Joined: 2015-04-06

Posts: 1,132

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

From nothing comes nothing. They do have to pay for the server etc.

There is no such thing like "everything for free".
Utopia.

---

Hi.

Pyromaniac

Official Caroler

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,868

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

I really really really really want signs, I'll admit, but I dont think everyone should get them especially after some people had to pay to get them.

If MrShoe decides to give everyone signs, I certainly wont argue, but he should be ready to face the outpouring of angry BC members afterwards.

!Sigg✚

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

...but he should be ready to face the outpouring of angry BC members afterwards.

You got that right, I'll hunt him down and destroy him. Signs are quite an important block and I think paying for it is fair.

Tachyonic

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

What about Beta Members?

Nowadays, that $10 or whatever is pretty much a waste.

Pyromaniac

Official Caroler

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,868

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

^This is true.

I was so **** when he took away beta.

I think we can all just agree that we should kill MrShoe

!Sigg✚

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

^This is true.

I was so **** when he took away beta.

I think we can all just agree that we should kill MrShoe

Well, ok; I have his address. When shall we meet up?

Tachyonic

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Email him to give us a refund of our $10 since it wasn't for donation but for purchase.
If he declines, we can technically sue him.
huehuehue

AzurePudding

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Couldn't agree more in the 1st part.

Signs should not be released to anybody like candy. Why? Because people will use derogatory language on the signs and if they're banned, it wouldn't be a big thing since they just wasted energy. And since it's in the builders club it will be a good punishment if the person is banned for using it wrong because they loose money for the act. (Opinion)

Oh, and not to forget! if you get banned you can make another acc and keep making those childish mistakes. Nothing to loose; especially for starters.

Err..

I think that's a non-point.   [b]People can already write in blocks which can be seen in the minimap, unlike the text of a sign.   Hell, we even have chat now where people can curse as much as they feel like avoiding censors.   Having signs more available to people could help with better levels, or make them more interesting with some story.   More interesting levels = more players, more players = more customers, more customers = more moolah.   The main point of Builder's Club is for people to get access to all the blocks they need quickly.   Signs, however, cannot be gotten any other way other than paying 100 bucks a year, which I believe most people wouldn't do just for the signs.   I have just about everything.   I would not experience the full package of builder's club if I paid 100 bucks for a year.   This makes me not want to.   Even if at 50 bucks.   If they brought back the old beta seperate purchase and included signs with it, people would spend money on that rather than not spending at all as 100 dollars is asking for too much.  

If I want a tire, I'd like to be able to buy a tire, and not be forced to buy a whole car just for the tire I want.

I'm just going to address the bold part since that's like a counter to not getting signs for everyone. The rest of your paragraph is just making points of getting cash from the implement of signs, but I still doubt it will bring more players since it's going to be for everyone. (Less interesting)

Okay, now with the cursing with bricks in the minimap and the block text comparison. The block is to make others want to buy BC to use text so EE can get cash. And the chat thing being out for everyone is not a issue since Chris thoughts of it was just to get parents to let their kids play the game safely. 1 cent chat VS free chat? Not a big diff. My other point about cursing on the minimap is that the text block will grab more attention since that's the main point. Also, you will rarely see cursing on minimaps, the only 2 occasions of witnessing this is through a world that has a free code or a special person. I can't extend that enough.

The text block is a "owner responsibility" since only the owner can use it. (More easy to ban)
Seeing derogatory language will be hard to spot. You rarely see those worlds that have cursing to stay on the map. Also, if you see cursing it will mostly be in a free code world and that will be hard to spot the person causing the act. The owner of the world won't be banned.

Okay, and since bad words are hardly seen, what makes you think they will suddenly start popping up all over the place when a sign is used?

I disagree, Signs should be BC only; because we paid for it.

A lot of people bought BC before signs were added.   100 bucks a year just for signs isn't even worth it.   BC might seem like a deal for new players who want all packs, but for older members with nearly everything, all that there is to get are the signs.   Something we want.   But don't want to pay 100 bucks a year just for it.

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

They should just bring beta back, give signs to beta members, and keep Builder's Club, but make it alot less expensive.

---

________________________________________________________

AzurePudding

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

They should just bring beta back, give signs to beta members, and keep Builder's Club, but make it alot less expensive.

Yeah that.

And give all BC members before the price drop a doubled subscription or something because they paid more.

Last edited by AzurePudding (Aug 1 2013 11:59:21 am)

Helvi

Member

Joined: 2015-04-06

Posts: 1,132

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

When Shoe gives signs to ordinary people I will be mad as a realm god. Serious. I did not pay money for the freaking signs for nothing!

I payed money for them as well as I payed money to outstand from the crowd of normal people. Having the red arrow on the playerlist, the god aura, everything in infiite numbers available. Showing of with tons of portals. Thats why I wanted BC. To be legally be more arrogant than many others

Also I supported this game with my payment. btw I not only bought BETA and BC for me during my EE time, but I also bought beta, chat and BC for several others.

I demand something which allows me to stand out from the greedy masses - with me donating and supporting the game and their developers despite all the issues I had with them.
If you want signs, BUY THEM !

---

Hi.

AzurePudding

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

When Shoe gives signs to ordinary people I will be mad as a realm god. Serious. I did not pay money for the freaking signs for nothing!

I payed money for them as well as I payed money to outstand from the crowd of normal people. Having the red arrow on the playerlist, the god aura, everything in infiite numbers available. Showing of with tons of portals. Thats why I wanted BC. To be legally be more arrogant than many others

Also I supported this game with my payment. btw I not only bought BETA and BC for me during my EE time, but I also bought beta, chat and BC for several others.

I demand something which allows me to stand out from the greedy masses - with me donating and supporting the game and their developers despite all the issues I had with them.
If you want signs, BUY THEM !

Some of us would if we could buy just the signs.   100 bucks a year when you have every block and more than enough of the limited kinds (such as portals) just for signs isn't worth it.

Helvi

Member

Joined: 2015-04-06

Posts: 1,132

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

Beta was something outstanding and shoe needed something else instead. Beta has become to common. Now we have the builders club. It will never end.

I got my BC when it was on a heavy discount (2 dollar / month) which is even less due to me paying in euros).

---

Hi.

skullz17

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 6,699

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

It's not very likely that beta will be coming back.

Signs should be removed from Builder's Club, and instead implemented like Diamonds are, as a separate purchase that costs gems. That way they're still making money but we don't have to pay $100 so everyone's happy.

Signs should cost much less than diamonds, since diamonds are more of a donation. They should also be less than beta. Maybe 20 gems is 1 sign, or something like that.

---

thx for sig bobithan

!Sigg✚

Guest

Re: Signs should be for non builders club memebers

It's not very likely that beta will be coming back.

Signs should be removed from Builder's Club, and instead implemented like Diamonds are, as a separate purchase that costs gems. That way they're still making money but we don't have to pay $100 so everyone's happy.

Signs should cost much less than diamonds, since diamonds are more of a donation. They should also be less than beta. Maybe 20 gems is 1 sign, or something like that.

or just 200 for infinate.